Physician-scientists in obstetrics and gynecology: predictors of success in obtaining independent research funding

被引:27
|
作者
Okeigwe, Ijeoma [1 ]
Wang, Cynthia [1 ]
Politch, Joseph A. [1 ]
Heffner, Linda J. [1 ]
Kuohung, Wendy [1 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Boston, MA 02118 USA
关键词
career development award; independent funding; K award; physician-scientist; R01; AWARDEES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.007
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Obstetrics and gynecology departments receive the smallest amount of National Institutes of Health research funding and have significantly lower application success rates compared to pediatric, internal medicine, and surgery departments. The development of mentored early career development training grants (K awards) has been one strategy implemented by the National Institutes of Health to help aspiring physician-scientists establish independent research careers. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to describe the cohort of obstetrics and gynecology physician-scientists who were K08, K12, and K23 recipients from 1988 through 2015 and to identify predictors of success in obtaining independent federal funding, as defined by acquisition of an R01, R21, R34, U01, U54, P01, or P50 award. We hypothesized that sex, subspecialty, type of K award, and dual MD/PhD would impact success rates. STUDY DESIGN: K08, K12, and K23 recipients from 1988 through 2015 were identified from the National Institutes of Health Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools, the office of the National Institutes of Health Freedom of Information Act, and the website of the Reproductive Scientist Development Program. Data were stratified by sex, educational degree, subspecialty, and type of K award. Data were analyzed using the Pearson chi(2) and Fisher exact tests. The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to determine rates of conversion to independent funding over time. RESULTS: A total of 388 K recipients were identified. Women accounted for 66% of K awards while men accounted for 34%. Among K recipients, 82% were MDs, while 18% were MD/PhDs. K12 awards accounted for 82% of all K awards, while K08 and K23 awards accounted for 10% and 8%, respectively. Subspecialists in maternal-fetal medicine and reproductive endocrinology and infertility received the highest proportion of K awards, followed by generalists and gynecologic oncologists. Altogether, the 3 subspecialty groups accounted for 68% of all K awards. R01 awards made up the bulk of independent funding. Among recipients who received their first K award between 1988 and 2009, 63 of 288 (22%) were successful at obtaining an R01. Rates of R21 (n = 22), U01 (n = 15), U54 (n = 12), P01 (n = 5), R34 (n = 1), and P50 (n = 1) acquisition ranged from 0.35-7.6%. In all, 118 K scholars (41%) were successful at achieving independent funding of any type compared to 1219 of 7535 (16.2%) obstetrics and gynecology non-K scholars. K08 recipients received the largest proportion of R01 awards compared to K12 and K23 recipients (32% vs 20%; P =.12), while 21% of K12 recipients and 17% of K23 recipients achieved an R01. There were no differences in the rates of independent funding success among K12 programs. K23 recipients were more likely to obtain an R21 (22% vs 6%, P =.008) compared to K12 and K08 recipients. The mean time to R01 acquisition was 6.8 years, while the mean time to independent funding of any type was 6.4 years. There were no significant differences in independent funding success rates by sex, educational degree, or subspecialty, although generalists received the highest proportion of R01 awards (29%). CONCLUSION: Mentored early career development K programs enable aspiring obstetrics and gynecology physician-scientists to achieve higher rates of National Institutes of Health-based independent research funding compared to non-K recipients.
引用
收藏
页码:84.e1 / 84.e8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinician-Scientists in Obstetrics & Gynecology: Predictors of Success in Obtaining Independent Research Funding
    Okeigwe, Ijeoma
    Heffner, Linda J.
    Kuohung, Wendy
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2014, 21 (03) : 202A - 202A
  • [2] More than grit: growing and sustaining physician-scientists in obstetrics and gynecology
    Parchem, Jacqueline G.
    Townsel, Courtney D.
    Wernimont, Sarah A.
    Afshar, Yalda
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [3] Influence of Research Continuity on Physician-Scientists' Career Success
    Brownrout, Jenna
    Norato, Gina
    Bensken, Wyatt
    Squirewell, Catherine
    Gordon, Taylor
    Heiss, John
    Nath, Avindra
    Khan, Omar, I
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2021, 97 (20) : E2039 - E2045
  • [4] A challenge for the 21st century: whither physician-scientists in obstetrics, gynecology, and the reproductive sciences?
    Longo, Lawrence D.
    Jaffe, Robert B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 198 (05) : 489 - 495
  • [5] The Influence of Research Continuity on Neurologist's Career Success as Physician-Scientists
    Brownrout, Jenna
    Hansen, Alexandra
    Bensken, Wyatt
    Norato, Gina
    Heiss, John
    Nath, Avindra
    Khan, Omar
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2019, 92 (15)
  • [6] Mentoring Underrepresented Minority Physician-Scientists to Success
    Kalet, Adina
    Libby, Anne M.
    Jagsi, Reshma
    Brady, Kathleen
    Chavis-Keeling, Deborah
    Pillinger, Michael H.
    Daumit, Gail L.
    Drake, Amelia F.
    Drake, Wonder Puryear
    Fraser, Victoria
    Ford, Daniel
    Hochman, Judith S.
    Jones, Rochelle D.
    Mangurian, Christina
    Meagher, Emma A.
    McGuinness, Georgeann
    Regensteiner, Judith G.
    Rubin, Deborah C.
    Yaffe, Kristine
    Ravenell, Joseph E.
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2022, 97 (04) : 497 - 502
  • [7] A Comprehensive Career-Success Model for Physician-Scientists
    Rubio, Doris M.
    Primack, Brian A.
    Switzer, Galen E.
    Bryce, Cindy L.
    Seltzer, Deborah L.
    Kapoor, Wishwa N.
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2011, 86 (12) : 1571 - 1576
  • [8] Analysis of NIH Research Funding in Transplantation: The Important Impact of Physician-Scientists in Abdominal Transplant Research.
    Narahari, A.
    Mehaffey, J.
    Chandrabhatla, A.
    Baderdinni, P.
    Kron, L.
    Brayman, K.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 18 : 733 - 734
  • [9] Translational Research and the Shifting Landscape for Physician-Scientists
    Stone, Kathlyn
    [J]. ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2010, 68 (03) : A8 - A9
  • [10] Supporting Research Career Development of Physician-Scientists
    Singh, Upinder
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2018, 218 : S36 - S39