Potentialities of biogas installation in South African meat value chain for environmental impacts reduction

被引:29
|
作者
Russo, V. [1 ]
von Blottnitz, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cape Town, EBE Fac, Chem Engn Dept, ZA-7701 Rondebosch, South Africa
关键词
Biogas; Animal manure; Slaughterhouse wastes; Livestock; CO2-Reduction; ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ORGANIC WASTES; METHANE PRODUCTION; CATTLE MANURE; BY-PRODUCTS; SUSTAINABILITY; DEPLOYMENT; EMISSIONS; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.133
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Livestock farming in South Africa has expanded significantly, and thus there is a corresponding increasing need to properly manage the generated waste streams. Anaerobic digestion to produce biogas is becoming an increasingly popular technology choice for the treatment of organic wastes and wastewater. Energy production from the anaerobic digestion of manures and slaughterhouse wastes would reduce untreated waste disposal and provide additional income. This study investigated biogas plants potentialities to reduce emissions from poor waste management both at the feedlot and at the abattoir stage of the South Africa beef and pork value chain. Electricity generation from the biogas, and possibly usage of co-produced heat would further reduce GHG emissions by about 1.56 Mt CO2eq per year, reducing the carbon footprints of beef and pork by 10% and 30% respectively. Even more significant reductions of both AC and EU impacts should be achievable by avoiding mostly landfilling of wastes and over-fertilization of soils. Furthermore, the produced biogas, burned for generating electricity and heat used within the industries themselves, might make them self-sufficient from the national grid. The nutrient-rich digestate would be similar in quantity to imported fertilizers, reducing the cost of importing and possibly generating additional income. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 473
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Environmental impacts of the meat chain - Current status and future perspectives
    Djekic, Ilija
    Tomasevic, Igor
    TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 54 : 94 - 102
  • [2] The BioValueChain model: a Norwegian model for calculating environmental impacts of biogas value chains
    Lyng, Kari-Anne
    Modahl, Ingunn Saur
    Moller, Hanne
    Morken, John
    Briseid, Tormod
    Hanssen, Ole Jorgen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2015, 20 (04): : 490 - 502
  • [3] The BioValueChain model: a Norwegian model for calculating environmental impacts of biogas value chains
    Kari-Anne Lyng
    Ingunn Saur Modahl
    Hanne Møller
    John Morken
    Tormod Briseid
    Ole Jørgen Hanssen
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2015, 20 : 490 - 502
  • [4] THE FOOD VALUE OF BILTONG (SOUTH AFRICAN DRIED MEAT) AND ITS USE ON EXPEDITIONS
    LEWIS, HE
    MASTERTON, JP
    WARD, PG
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 1957, 11 (01) : 5 - &
  • [5] Relationships between environmental impacts and added value along the supply chain
    Clift, R
    Wright, L
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2000, 65 (03) : 281 - 295
  • [6] Analysis of South African Commercial Traditional Linefish Snoek Value Chain
    Hara, Mafaniso M.
    MARINE RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2014, 29 (03) : 279 - 299
  • [7] An evaluation of South African fuelwood with regards to calorific value and environmental impact
    Munalula, Francis
    Meincken, Martina
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2009, 33 (03): : 415 - 420
  • [8] Transforming South African Agriculture: The Role of Credit in Supporting Value Chain Sustainability
    Jonas, Nomonde
    Christian, Mzuyanda
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2025, 15 (06):
  • [9] The value chain and activities of polyethylene terephthalate plastics in the South African waste economy
    Hoffman, Marlin
    Schenck, Catherina
    LOCAL ECONOMY, 2020, 35 (05): : 523 - 535
  • [10] Analysing the value chain for African leafy vegetables in Limpopo Province, South Africa
    Senyolo, Grany M.
    Wale, Edilegnaw
    Ortmann, Gerald F.
    COGENT SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2018, 4 (01): : 1 - 16