Are retail investors the culprits? Evidence from Australian individual stock price bubbles

被引:9
|
作者
Henker, Julia [1 ]
Henker, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Australian Sch Business, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE | 2010年 / 16卷 / 04期
关键词
retail investor; individual investor; asset pricing; behavioral finance; BEHAVIOR; MARKET; MODEL; NEWS;
D O I
10.1080/13518470902872335
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We address the question of whether the trading of retail investors causes stock price anomalies. Our intent is to study settings in which retail investors are most likely to have influence on market prices. Previous research suggests that retail investors have more influence in small capitalization stocks, and argues that retail investors are most likely to be irrational. Most theories of stock price anomalies hypothesize the presence of irrational traders. Consequently, we focus on stock price anomalies in primarily small capitalization stocks. Our data are from the Australian Stock Exchange Clearinghouse. The Australian stock market is characterized by a high level of direct stock holdings by individual investors, further enhancing the likelihood of retail investors' influence. We investigate the Granger causality between investor category trading and stock prices, and display the relative trading volume of the investor categories. We conclude that retail investors are not responsible for stock mispricing. Since retail investors do not affect prices in this carefully selected environment, we infer that their trading is unlikely to influence stock market prices. Our conclusion has important implications for theories, particularly behavioral finance theories, that are dependent on the influence of retail investor trading in stock markets.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 304
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The informational role of individual investors in stock pricing: Evidence from large individual and small retail investors
    Chen, Hung-Ling
    Chow, Edward H.
    Shiu, Cheng-Yi
    [J]. PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2015, 31 : 36 - 56
  • [2] Retail Investors and Stock Price Synchronicity
    Wu, Wenfeng
    Rui, Oliver M.
    [J]. REVIEW OF PACIFIC BASIN FINANCIAL MARKETS AND POLICIES, 2022, 25 (03)
  • [3] Are paper winners gamblers? Evidence from Australian retail investors
    Frino, Alex
    Lepone, Grace
    Wright, Danika
    [J]. ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2019, 59 : 593 - 614
  • [4] The impacts of institutional and individual investors on the price discovery in stock index futures market: Evidence from China
    Xu, Feng
    Wan, Difang
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2015, 15 : 221 - 231
  • [5] Price discrimination against retail Investors: Evidence from mini options
    Li, Yubin
    Zhao, Chen
    Zhong, Zhaodong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2019, 106 : 50 - 64
  • [6] Are individual stock investors overconfident? Evidence from an emerging market
    Tekce, Blent
    Yilmaz, Neslihan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL FINANCE, 2015, 5 : 35 - 45
  • [7] The Impact of Institutional Investors on Stock Price Synchronicity: Evidence from the Shanghai Stock Market
    Kun, Li
    Yu, Lei
    Hu, Xiaoxue
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2018, : 1548 - 1558
  • [8] Foreign Investors and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from Vietnam
    Vo Xuan Vinh
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCE, 2020, 20 (04) : 993 - 1004
  • [9] Foreign investors and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China
    Huang, Zhi-xiong
    Tang, Qi
    Huang, Siming
    [J]. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2020, 68 : 210 - 223
  • [10] Retail Investors and the Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle: Evidence from the Korean Stock Market
    Kang, Jangkoo
    Lee, Eunmee
    Sim, Myounghwa
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2014, 43 (02) : 183 - 222