The Comparison of Four Methods in Finding Influential Spreader in Social Network

被引:0
|
作者
Ren, Baozhang [1 ]
Deng, Yu Hui [1 ]
He, Ping [1 ]
Tsang, Kang-Too [1 ]
机构
[1] United Int Coll, BNU HKBU, Stat Dept, Zhuhai, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
With the prevalence of smart phone and Internet, social media have been developing both its customer base and its impact on the society. With the use of social media's influence on people, companies begin to advertise their product and services on the social media platform. Therefore, in order to guarantee the effect of the advertisement, methods to find influential spreaders in social network are proposed. In this paper, we aim to compare four different methods that have been proved to be efficient, on both simulated network and real life network, and then use SIR model to propagate their diffusion process. The results of simulation network show that all four methods produced the same influential spreaders and it was proven to be a good initial spreader in a SIR model. However, in the network generated from Sina Weibo, the four methods all produced different influential spreader. The possible cause of the different results from simulated result is that the simulated network neglects the cohesion of influential nodes and therefore, the simulated network will value degree more than the position of a node. After applying the SIR model, we found that the degree and betweenness produce nodes that have the highest infection number while K-core decomposition produces nodes that can reach nodes in a further distance faster than other methods and nodes produced by PageRank can reach farther in the network despite of its less infection number.
引用
收藏
页码:2254 / 2261
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Identifying Influential Rumor Spreader in Social Network
    Zhang, Ruixia
    Li, Deyu
    DISCRETE DYNAMICS IN NATURE AND SOCIETY, 2019, 2019
  • [2] Churn Prediction by Finding Most Influential nodes in Social Network
    Pagare, Reena
    Khare, Akhil
    2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING, ANALYTICS AND SECURITY TRENDS (CAST), 2016, : 68 - 71
  • [3] Finding Influential Nodes in a Social Network from Information Diffusion Data
    Kimura, Masahiro
    Saito, Kazumi
    Nakano, Ryohei
    Motoda, Hiroshi
    SOCIAL COMPUTING AND BEHAVIORAL MODELING, 2009, : 138 - +
  • [4] Comparison of statistical methods for finding network motifs
    Albieri, Vanna
    Didelez, Vanessa
    STATISTICAL APPLICATIONS IN GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2014, 13 (04) : 403 - 422
  • [5] Influential Spreader Identification in Complex Networks Based on Network Connectivity and Efficiency
    Qiang, Rong
    Yang, Jianshe
    WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS & MOBILE COMPUTING, 2022, 2022
  • [6] Using Estimated Personality of Social Network Members for Finding Influential Nodes in Viral Marketing
    Amnieh, Iman Golkar
    Kaedi, Marjan
    CYBERNETICS AND SYSTEMS, 2015, 46 (05) : 355 - 378
  • [7] Finding influential subjects in a network using a causal framework
    Lee, Youjin
    Buchanan, Ashley L.
    Ogburn, Elizabeth L.
    Friedman, Samuel R.
    Halloran, M. Elizabeth
    Katenka, Natallia V.
    Wu, Jing
    Nikolopoulos, Georgios K.
    BIOMETRICS, 2023, 79 (04) : 3715 - 3727
  • [8] Finding influential users of web event in social media
    Ma, Qichen
    Luo, Xiangfeng
    Hai Zhuge
    CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2019, 31 (03):
  • [9] CDA: A Clustering Degree Based Influential Spreader Identification Algorithm in Weighted Complex Network
    Wang, Qian
    Ren, Jiadong
    Wang, Yu
    Zhang, Bing
    Cheng, Yongqiang
    Zhao, Xiaolin
    IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 : 19550 - 19559
  • [10] Mining Influential Users in Social Network
    Kao, Li-Jen
    Huang, Yo-Ping
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC 2015): BIG DATA ANALYTICS FOR HUMAN-CENTRIC SYSTEMS, 2015, : 1209 - 1214