Individualized Nomogram for Predicting Survival in Patients with Brain Metastases After Stereotactic Radiosurgery Utilizing Driver Gene Mutations and Volumetric Surrogates

被引:8
|
作者
Zhou, Cheng [1 ]
Shan, Changguo [1 ]
Lai, Mingyao [1 ]
Zhou, Zhaoming [1 ,2 ]
Zhen, Junjie [1 ]
Deng, Guanhua [1 ]
Li, Hainan [3 ]
Li, Juan [1 ]
Ren, Chen [4 ]
Wang, Jian [4 ]
Lu, Ming [5 ]
Zhang, Liang [5 ]
Wu, Taihua [5 ]
Zhu, Dan [5 ]
Kong, Feng-Ming [6 ]
Chen, Longhua [4 ]
Cai, Linbo [1 ]
Wen, Lei [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Sanju Brain Hosp, Dept Oncol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Med Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Radiat Med, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hosp, Dept Pathol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Clin Oncol, Shenzhen Hosp, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2021年 / 11卷
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
brain metastases; stereotactic radiosurgery; nomogram; gene mutation; prediction model;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2021.659538
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
It is well-known that genomic mutational analysis plays a significant role in patients with NSCLC for personalized treatment. Given the increasing use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BM), there is an emerging need for more precise assessment of survival outcomes after SRS. Patients with BM and treated by SRS were eligible in this study. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Cox regression models were used to identify independent prognostic factors. A survival predictive nomogram was developed and evaluated by Concordance-index (C-index), area under the curve (AUC), and calibration curve. From January 2016 to December 2019, a total of 356 BM patients were eligible. The median OS was 17.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 15.5-19.9] and the actual OS at 1- and 2-years measured 63.2 and 37.6%, respectively. A nomogram for OS was developed by incorporating four independent prognostic factors: Karnofsky Performance Score, cumulative tumor volume, gene mutation status, and serum lactate dehydrogenase. The nomogram was validated in a separate cohort and demonstrated good calibration and good discriminative ability (C-index = 0.780, AUC = 0.784). The prognostic accuracy of the nomogram (0.792) was considerably enhanced when compared with classical prognostic indices, including the Graded Prognostic Assessment (0.708), recursive partitioning analysis (0.587), and the SRS (0.536). Kaplan-Meier curves showed significant differences in OS among the stratified low-, median- and high-risk groups (P < 0.001). In conclusion, we developed and validated an individualized prognostic nomogram by integrating physiological, volumetric, clinical chemistry, and molecular biological surrogates. Although this nomogram should be validated by independent external study, it has a potential to facilitate more precise risk-stratifications to guide personalized treatment for BM.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with resected brain metastases: a volumetric analysis
    Patel, Rajal A.
    Lock, Derrick
    Helenowski, Irene B.
    Chandler, James P.
    Tate, Matthew C.
    Bloch, Orin
    Sachdev, Sean
    Kruser, Tim J.
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 140 (02) : 395 - 401
  • [2] Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with resected brain metastases: a volumetric analysis
    Rajal A. Patel
    Derrick Lock
    Irene B. Helenowski
    James P. Chandler
    Matthew C. Tate
    Orin Bloch
    Sean Sachdev
    Tim J. Kruser
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2018, 140 : 395 - 401
  • [3] Multi-institutional Nomogram Predicting Survival Free From Salvage Whole Brain Radiation After Radiosurgery in Patients With Brain Metastases
    Gorovets, Daniel
    Ayala-Peacock, Diandra
    Tybor, David J.
    Rava, Paul
    Ebner, Daniel
    Cielo, Deus
    Noren, Georg
    Wazer, David E.
    Chan, Michael
    Hepel, Jaroslaw T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 97 (02): : 246 - 253
  • [4] Predicting the Risk of Subsequent Distant Brain Metastases After Stereotactic Radiosurgery or Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients
    Rades, Dirk
    Nguyen, Trang
    Dziggel, Liesa
    Blanck, Oliver
    Schild, Steven E.
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 40 (07) : 4081 - 4086
  • [5] Survival of melanoma patients with brain metastases treated with ipilimumab and stereotactic radiosurgery
    Tazi, Karim
    Hathaway, Amanda
    Chiuzan, Cody
    Shirai, Keisuke
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2015, 4 (01): : 1 - 6
  • [6] Survival after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases - A single-institution experience
    Olloni, A.
    Hansen, O.
    Kristiansen, C.
    Edvardsson, L.
    Nielsen, M.
    Jeppesen, S. S.
    Schytte, T.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S967 - S968
  • [7] Improvement in survival for melanoma patients with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery and immunotherapy
    Slevin, Finbar
    Marples, Maria
    Hatfield, Paul
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 30 : E2 - E2
  • [8] Survival and outcomes in patients with ≥ 25 cumulative brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery
    Benjamin, Carolina Gesteira
    Gurewitz, Jason
    Kavi, Ami
    Bernstein, Kenneth
    Silverman, Joshua
    Mureb, Monica
    Donahue, Bernadine
    Kondziolka, Douglas
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 137 (02) : 571 - 581
  • [9] Survival among patients with 10 or more brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery
    Rava, Paul
    Leonard, Kara
    Sioshansi, Shirin
    Curran, Bruce
    Wazer, David E.
    Cosgrove, G. Rees
    Noren, Georg
    Hepel, Jaroslaw T.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 119 (02) : 457 - 462
  • [10] The Volumetric Response of Brain Metastases After Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Its Post-treatment Implications
    Sharpton, Suzanne R.
    Oermann, Eric K.
    Moore, Dominic T.
    Schreiber, Eric
    Hoffman, Riane
    Morris, David E.
    Ewend, Matthew G.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 74 (01) : 9 - 15