Development of Malignancy-Risk Gene Signature Assay for Predicting Breast Cancer Risk

被引:2
|
作者
Sun, James [1 ]
Chen, Dung-Tsa [2 ]
Li, Jiannong [2 ]
Sun, Weihong [1 ]
Yoder, Sean J. [3 ]
Mesa, Tania E. [3 ]
Wloch, Marek [4 ]
Roetzheim, Richard [1 ]
Laronga, Christine [1 ]
Lee, M. Catherine [1 ]
机构
[1] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Breast Oncol, Tampa, FL USA
[2] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Tampa, FL USA
[3] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Mol Genom Core Facil, Tampa, FL USA
[4] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Tissue Core, Tampa, FL USA
关键词
Breast cancer; Gail Model; Gene signature; Gene expression; Cancer risk; NanoString; GERMLINE MUTATIONS; SEQUENCE-ANALYSIS; WHITE WOMEN; VALIDATION; MODEL; SUSCEPTIBILITY; BRCA1;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.021
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Breast cancer (BC) risk assessment models are statistical estimates based on patient characteristics. We developed a gene expression assay to assess BC risk using benign breast biopsy tissue. Methods: A NanoString-based malignancy risk (MR) gene signature was validated for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue. It was applied to FFPE benign and BC specimens obtained from women who underwent breast biopsy, some of whom developed BC during follow-up to evaluate diagnostic capability of the MR signature. BC risk was calculated with MR score, Gail risk score, and both tests combined. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate these 3 models. Results: NanoString MR demonstrated concordance between fresh frozen and FFPE malignant samples (r = 0.99). Within the validation set, 563 women with benign breast biopsies from 2007 to 2011 were identified and followed for at least 5 y; 50 women developed BC (affected) within 5 y from biopsy. Three groups were compared: benign tissue from unaffected and affected patients and malignant tissue from affected patients. Kruskal-Wallis test suggested difference between the groups (P = 0.09) with trend in higher predicted MR score for benign tissue from affected patients before development of BC. Neither the MR signature nor Gail risk score were statistically different between affected and unaffected patients; combining both tests demonstrated best predictive value (AUC = 0.71). Conclusions: FFPE gene expression assays can be used to develop a predictive test for BC. Further investigation of the combined MR signature and Gail Model is required. Our assay was limited by scant cellularity of archived breast tissue. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 162
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of malignancy-risk gene signature in breast cancer patients
    Chen, Dung-Tsa
    Nasir, Aejaz
    Venkataramu, Chinnambally
    Fulp, William
    Gruidl, Mike
    Yeatman, Timothy
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2010, 120 (01) : 25 - 34
  • [2] Evaluation of malignancy-risk gene signature in breast cancer patients
    Dung-Tsa Chen
    Aejaz Nasir
    Chinnambally Venkataramu
    William Fulp
    Mike Gruidl
    Timothy Yeatman
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2010, 120 : 25 - 34
  • [3] Proliferative genes dominate malignancy-risk gene signature in histologically-normal breast tissue
    Chen, Dung-Tsa
    Nasir, Aejaz
    Culhane, Aedin
    Venkataramu, Chinnambally
    Fulp, William
    Rubio, Renee
    Wang, Tao
    Agrawal, Deepak
    McCarthy, Susan M.
    Gruidl, Mike
    Bloom, Gregory
    Anderson, Tove
    White, Joe
    Quackenbush, John
    Yeatman, Timothy
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2010, 119 (02) : 335 - 346
  • [4] Proliferative genes dominate malignancy-risk gene signature in histologically-normal breast tissue
    Dung-Tsa Chen
    Aejaz Nasir
    Aedin Culhane
    Chinnambally Venkataramu
    William Fulp
    Renee Rubio
    Tao Wang
    Deepak Agrawal
    Susan M. McCarthy
    Mike Gruidl
    Gregory Bloom
    Tove Anderson
    Joe White
    John Quackenbush
    Timothy Yeatman
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2010, 119 : 335 - 346
  • [5] Prognostic and Predictive Value of a Malignancy-Risk Gene Signature in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Chen, Dung-Tsa
    Hsu, Ying-Lin
    Fulp, William J.
    Coppola, Domenico
    Haura, Eric B.
    Yeatman, Timothy J.
    Cress, W. Douglas
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2011, 103 (24) : 1859 - 1870
  • [6] Gene signature predicts breast cancer risk
    Lemmens, N
    [J]. PHARMACOGENOMICS, 2005, 6 (02) : 101 - 101
  • [7] Development and validation of a gene signature predicting the risk of postmenopausal osteoporosis
    Yuan, W.
    Yang, M.
    Zhu, Y.
    [J]. BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (08): : 548 - 560
  • [8] A Seven-gene Signature Predicting Benefit of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy in High Risk Breast Cancer
    Tramm, T.
    Mohammed, H.
    Myhre, S.
    Alsner, J.
    Borresen-Dale, A. L.
    Sorlie, T.
    Frigessi, A.
    Overgaard, J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 : S181 - S181
  • [9] Development of a Gene Risk Signature for Patients of Pancreatic Cancer
    Liu, Tao
    Chen, Long
    Gao, Guili
    Liang, Xing
    Peng, Junfeng
    Zheng, Minghui
    Li, Judong
    Ye, Yongqiang
    Shao, Chenghao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [10] Development of a Gene Risk Signature for Patients of Pancreatic Cancer
    Liu, Tao
    Chen, Long
    Gao, Guili
    Liang, Xing
    Peng, Junfeng
    Zheng, Minghui
    Li, Judong
    Ye, Yongqiang
    Shao, Chenghao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022