Stainless Hadfield steel in comparison

被引:1
|
作者
Schmalt, F [1 ]
Berns, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Lehrstuhl Werkstofftech, D-44780 Bochum, Germany
关键词
stainless steel; carbon plus nitrogen; wear; mechanical properties; Hadfield steel;
D O I
10.1002/mawe.200400813
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The well-known Hadfield steel X120Mn12 still has broad applications in the mineral processing industry. Especially under impact loading Hadfield steel displays good wear resistance due to its high cold work ability. However, Hadfield steel is not corrosion resistant. This gap of a wear-resistant and at the same time corrosion resistant steel is closed by the new developed steel X40CrMnN15-I7, which can be called high-strength because of a yield strength of 494 MPa. The following investigation characterizes the wear behaviour of steel X40CrMnN15-17 with 0,4 Ma.-% N in comparison to the standard steels X5CrNil8-10 and X120Mn12 under impact and grooving load as well as in single scratch tests. X-ray investigations give no evidence of deformation-induced martensite in the wear surface of steel X40CrMnN15-17. In contrast, small quantities of epsilon-martensite are detected in steel X120Mn12 and also in X5CrNil8-10, which additionally provided large quantities of alpha-martensite. Application areas of steel X40CrMnN15-I7 are seen both in the wear protection sector as e.g. impact plates and within the range of crash relevant construction units for the automotive industry.
引用
收藏
页码:722 / 728
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Surface structure of stainless and Hadfield steel after impact wear
    Petrov, YN
    Gavrijuk, VG
    Berns, H
    Schmalt, F
    WEAR, 2006, 260 (06) : 687 - 691
  • [2] Characterization of different work hardening behavior in AISI 321 stainless steel and Hadfield steel
    Zhang, Wanhu
    Wu, Junliang
    Wen, Yuhua
    Ye, Jianjian
    Li, Ning
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2010, 45 (13) : 3433 - 3437
  • [3] Characterization of different work hardening behavior in AISI 321 stainless steel and Hadfield steel
    Wanhu Zhang
    Junliang Wu
    Yuhua Wen
    Jianjian Ye
    Ning Li
    Journal of Materials Science, 2010, 45 : 3433 - 3437
  • [4] Comparison of Abrasive Wear Resistance of Hardox Steel and Hadfield Cast Steel
    Zemlik, Martyna
    Konat, Lukasz
    Lesny, Kacper
    Jamroziak, Krzysztof
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (23):
  • [5] Multiphase steel with improved impact-abrasive wear resistance in comparison with conventional Hadfield steel
    Wang, Wei
    Song, Renbo
    Peng, Shiguang
    Pei, Zhongzheng
    MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2016, 105 : 96 - 105
  • [6] DEFORMATION TWINNING IN HADFIELD STEEL
    ROBERTS, WN
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE METALLURGICAL SOCIETY OF AIME, 1964, 230 (03): : 372 - &
  • [7] FORMABILITY CHARACTERIZATION OF HADFIELD STEEL
    BAYRAKTAR, E
    LEVAILLANT, C
    ALTINTAS, S
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 1994, 47 (1-2) : 13 - 31
  • [8] Abrasive Wear Behavior of High Chromium Cast Iron and Hadfield Steel—A Comparison
    Mehdi Mazar Atabaki
    Sajjad Jafari
    Hassan Abdollah-pour
    Journal of Iron and Steel Research International, 2012, 19 : 43 - 50
  • [9] Plasma immersion ion implantation of stainless steel: Austenitic stainless steel in comparison to austenitic-ferritic stainless steel
    Blawert, C
    Weisheit, A
    Mordike, BL
    Knoop, FM
    SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 85 (1-2): : 15 - 27
  • [10] A COMPARISON OF TINNED STEEL AND STAINLESS STEEL MILK CANS
    HANSEN, LJ
    WINDER, WC
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1953, 36 (06) : 564 - 564