Prenatal diagnosis and management of vasa previa in twin pregnancies: a case series and systematic review

被引:33
|
作者
Jauniaux, Eric [1 ]
Melcer, Yaakov [2 ,3 ]
Maymon, Ron [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Fac Populat Hlth Sci, EGA Inst Womens Hlth, Acad Dept Obstet & Gynecol, London, England
[2] Assaf Harofeh Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Zerifin, Israel
[3] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Sch Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
placenta; twins; umbilical cord; vasa previa; velamentous; PLACENTAL IMPLANTATION ABNORMALITIES; ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; UMBILICAL-CORD; VELAMENTOUS INSERTION; MONOCHORIONIC TWINS; MULTIPLE GESTATIONS; EMBRYO-TRANSFER; RISK; ULTRASOUND;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.029
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Twin pregnancies are at higher risks of velamentous cord insertion and vasa previa. In vitro fertilization is an additional risk factor of abnormal cord insertion and thus the incidence of vasa previa is likely to increase over the next decades. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the role of ultrasound imaging in optimizing the management of twins diagnosed with vasa previa antenatally. STUDY DESIGN: We searched our database for twin pregnancies diagnosed with vasa previa and managed antenatally using measurements of cervical length and performed a systematic review of articles that correlated prenatal diagnosis of vasa previa in twins and pregnancy outcome. PubMed and MEDLINE were searched for studies published from 1987 through October 20, 2016, using specific medical subject heading terms, key words, and their combination. The primary eligibility criteria were articles that correlated prenatal ultrasound imaging of vasa previa and pregnancy outcome in twins. The secondary eligibility criteria was the use of cervical length in the management of twin pregnancies diagnosed antenatally with vasa previa. Two authors independently assessed inclusion criteria, data extraction, and analysis. The final selection included 3 case report series, 9 retrospective cohort studies, and 1 retrospective case-control study of vasa previa diagnosed prenatally and confirmed at birth in twin pregnancies. RESULTS: The search of our databases identified 6 cases of dichorionic-diamniotic twins and 1 case of monochorionic-diamniotic twins diagnosed prenatally with vasa previa between 22-29 weeks and managed using cervical length. Two cases were delivered by emergency because of rapid changes in cervical length in one and bleeding on placenta previa in the other at 33 and 30 weeks, respectively. The systematic review identified data on 56 cases. The incidence of twin pregnancies diagnosed antenatally with vasa previa in the cohort and case-control studies was 11.0%. Data on chorionicity were available in only 34 cases and cervical length measurements were used by only the authors of 2 case reports and 4 cohort studies. Velamentous cord insertion was the most common additional ultrasound findings in twins presenting with vasa previa in both our series and the systematic review. CONCLUSION: Vasa previa is associated with specific prenatal and obstetric complications with different outcomes in singletons compared to twins. Data on the diagnosis and management of vasa previa in twin pregnancies are limited but there is enough evidence to warrant guidelines for targeted screening. To enable the development of efficient management protocols tailored to the need of individual cases, future studies of the screening, diagnosis, and management of vasa previa should be prospective and multicentric with detailed data on twins including chorionicity and use of cervical length.
引用
收藏
页码:568 / 575
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Perinatal Outcome of Pregnancies With Prenatal Diagnosis of Vasa Previa: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Zhang, W.
    Geris, S.
    Al-Emara, N.
    Ramadan, G.
    Sotiriadis, A.
    Akolekar, R.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2021, 76 (10) : 585 - 587
  • [2] Perinatal outcome of pregnancies with prenatal diagnosis of vasa previa: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, W.
    Geris, S.
    Al-Emara, N.
    Ramadan, G.
    Sotiriadis, A.
    Akolekar, R.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 57 (05) : 710 - 719
  • [3] Vasa previa: prenatal diagnosis and management
    Melcer, Yaakov
    Maymon, Ron
    Jauniaux, Eric
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 30 (06) : 385 - 391
  • [4] Vasa previa, prenatal diagnosis and management
    Vinas, A. Ferrero
    Hernandez, J. Cortejoso
    Manso, S. de Miguel
    Mansilla, P. Suarez
    Colomo, C. Alvarez
    Martin, J. I. Gonzalez
    CLINICA E INVESTIGACION EN GINECOLOGIA Y OBSTETRICIA, 2020, 47 (01): : 18 - 21
  • [5] Perinatal Mortality Despite Prenatal Diagnosis of Vasa Previa A Systematic Review
    Heyborne, Kent
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 142 (03): : 519 - 528
  • [6] Perinatal Mortality Despite Prenatal Diagnosis of Vasa Previa: A Systematic Review
    Oyelese, Yinka
    Javinani, Ali
    Shamshirsaz, Alireza A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 143 (02): : e22 - e22
  • [7] Prenatal diagnosis and management of vasa previa: A 6-year review
    Kanda, Eriko
    Matsuda, Yoshio
    Kamitomo, Masato
    Maeda, Takatsugu
    Mihara, Keiko
    Hatae, Masayuki
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2011, 37 (10) : 1391 - 1396
  • [8] Prenatal diagnosis of vasa previa
    Breborowicz, Grzegorz H.
    Markwitz, Wieslaw
    Szpera-Gozdziewicz, Agata
    Dera-Szymanowska, Anna
    Ropacka-Lesiak, Mariola
    Szymanski, Piotr
    Kubiaczyk-Paluch, Beata
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2015, 28 (15): : 1806 - 1808
  • [9] Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnosis of Vasa Previa With Careful Intraoperative Management: A Case Report
    Chanu, Sairem M.
    Dasari, Papa
    Chitra, T.
    Pegu, Bhabani
    Rajalakshmi, T.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [10] Management of monoamniotic twin pregnancies: a case series and systematic review of the literature
    Allen, VM
    Windrim, R
    Barrett, J
    Ohlsson, A
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2001, 108 (09): : 931 - 936