Variability of mobile source air toxic emissions factors with MOBILE6.2

被引:0
|
作者
Claggett, Michael [1 ]
Miller, Terry L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Fed Highway Adm Res Ctr, 12300 West Dakota Ave,Suite 340, Lakewood, CO 80228 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
来源
AIR QUALITY 2006 | 2006年 / 1987期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper documents the ranges of mobile source air toxic (MSAT) emissions factors produced by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's MOBILE6.2 model because of changes in a variety of input parameters. These include calendar year, ambient temperature, fuel (gasoline) Reid vapor pressure (RVP), and vehicle speed. The variability of MSAT emissions factors is more than an order of magnitude. They are the most sensitive to changes in calendar year. For hydrocarbon-based MSATs (i.e., acetaldehyde, acrolein, benzene, butadiene, and formaldehyde), significant decreases in emissions factors can be realized by mitigating congested vehicle speeds. The variability is less for changes in temperature and changes in fuel RVP with moderate temperature. The emissions factors for diesel particulate matter change only as a function of calendar year and are not sensitive to changes in vehicle speed, temperature, or fuel RVP.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MOBILE6.2 modeling of exhaust air toxic emission factors - Trend and sensitivity analysis
    Tang, T
    Claggett, M
    Byun, J
    Roberts, M
    Granell, J
    Aspy, DE
    ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS 2005, 2005, (1941): : 99 - 106
  • [2] Mobile Source Air Toxic Emissions INTRODUCTION
    Collet, Susan
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2016, 66 (02) : 97 - 97
  • [3] Comparison of wintertime CO to NOx ratios to MOVES and MOBILE6.2 on-road emissions inventories
    Wallace, H. W.
    Jobson, B. T.
    Erickson, M. H.
    McCoskey, J. K.
    VanReken, T. M.
    Lamb, B. K.
    Vaughan, J. K.
    Hardy, R. J.
    Cole, J. L.
    Strachan, S. M.
    Zhang, W.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 63 : 289 - 297
  • [4] Methodology for evaluating mobile source air toxic emissions - Transportation project alternatives
    Claggett, Michael
    Miller, Terry L.
    AIR QUALITY 2006, 2006, (1987): : 32 - +
  • [5] Emissions of Air Toxic Compounds in Mobile Source for the Greater Metropolitan Area of Costa Rica in 2007
    Rodriguez-Yanez, Javier E.
    TECNOLOGIA EN MARCHA, 2015, 28 (04): : 66 - 77
  • [6] Mobile Source Air Toxic Emissions Sensitivity to Traffic Volume, Fleet Composition, and Average Speed
    Timoshek, Alexandra
    Eisinger, Douglas
    Bai, Song
    Niemeier, Deb
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2010, (2158) : 77 - 85
  • [7] Comparison of the MOVES2010a, MOBILE6.2, and EMFAC2007 mobile source emission models with on-road traffic tunnel and remote sensing measurements
    Fujita, Eric M.
    Campbell, David E.
    Zielinska, Barbara
    Chow, Judith C.
    Lindhjem, Christian E.
    DenBleyker, Allison
    Bishop, Gary A.
    Schuchmann, Brent G.
    Stedman, Donald H.
    Lawson, Douglas R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2012, 62 (10) : 1134 - 1149
  • [8] 利用MOBILE6.2模型预测高速公路路段综合排放因子
    孙晋伟
    李高波
    夏鸿文
    交通节能与环保, 2013, 9 (01) : 71 - 74
  • [9] Near-road air pollutant concentrations of CO and PM2.5: A comparison of MOBILE6.2/CALINE4 and generalized additive models
    Zhang, Kai
    Batterrnan, Stuart
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 44 (14) : 1740 - 1748
  • [10] Emissions inventory analysis of mobile source air pollution in Tel Aviv, Israel
    Newmark, GL
    ENERGY, AIR QUALITY, AND FUELS 2001: ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2001, (1750): : 40 - 48