Oil price shocks and the return and volatility spillover between industrial and precious metals☆

被引:73
|
作者
Umar, Zaghum [1 ,3 ]
Jareno, Francisco [2 ]
Escribano, Ana [2 ]
机构
[1] Zayed Univ, Coll Business, POB 144534, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
[2] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Fac Econ & Business Sci, Plaza Univ 1, Albacete 02071, Spain
[3] South Ural State Univ, Lenin Prospect 76, Chelyabinsk 454080, Russia
关键词
Industrial and precious metals; Connectedness; Crude oil prices; IMPULSE-RESPONSE ANALYSIS; CRUDE-OIL; CONNECTEDNESS; DEMAND; MARKETS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105291
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study explores the dynamic return and volatility connectedness for some dominant industrial (Aluminium, Copper, Lead, Nickel, Tin, and Zinc) and precious metals (Gold, Palladium, Platinum, Silver) to crude oil shocks (risk, demand, and supply) during the sample period between January 2, 2009 and July 17, 2020. Our findings indicate that, demand shocks and risk shocks are the dominant receiver (transmitter) of shocks from (to) for metal returns. Second, we document the time-varying nature of both total return and volatility connectedness. Third, both net directional return and volatility connectedness show that some metals such as Tin, Gold and, even, Nickel, Lead and Aluminium appear as net transmitters, at least in some intervals of the sample period analysed. On the other hand, other industrial and precious metal markets show a net receiver profile, such as Copper, Zinc and Platinum, among others. Lastly, we find more differences between the net dynamic connectedness of the metal markets analysed in terms of return than volatility. The net directional volatility connectedness increases sizably during the global crisis due to the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Return and Volatility Spillover Between Emerging Stock Markets and Precious Metals
    Celik, Ismail
    Ozdemir, Arife
    Gursoy, Samet
    Unlu, Hande Uzunoglu
    [J]. EGE ACADEMIC REVIEW, 2018, 18 (02) : 217 - 230
  • [2] Return and volatility transmission between oil price shocks and agricultural commodities
    Umar, Zaghum
    Gubareva, Mariya
    Naeem, Muhammad
    Akhter, Ayesha
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (02):
  • [3] The impact of oil price shocks on the stock market return and volatility relationship
    Kang, Wensheng
    Ratti, Ronald A.
    Yoon, Kyung Hwan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2015, 34 : 41 - 54
  • [4] Exogenous shocks and the spillover effects between uncertainty and oil price
    Li, Lei
    Yin, Libo
    Zhou, Yimin
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 54 : 224 - 234
  • [5] Oil shocks and stock return volatility
    Bachmeier, Lance J.
    Nadimi, Soheil R.
    [J]. QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2018, 68 : 1 - 9
  • [6] Oil price shocks and stock return volatility: New evidence based on volatility impulse response analysis
    Eraslan, Sercan
    Ali, Faek Menla
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2018, 172 : 59 - 62
  • [7] Volatility Spillover and Price Shocks in Iran's Meat Market
    Fakari, Behzad
    Aliabadi, Mohammad Mehdi Farsi
    Mahmoudi, Hashem
    Kojori, Moustafa
    [J]. CUSTOS E AGRONEGOCIO ON LINE, 2016, 12 (02): : 84 - 98
  • [8] Return and volatility spillovers among oil price shocks and international green bond markets
    Umar, Zaghum
    Hadhri, Sinda
    Abakah, Emmanuel Joel Aikins
    Usman, Muhammad
    Umar, Muhammad
    [J]. RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2024, 69
  • [9] Shocks and volatility transmission between oil price and Nigeria’s exchange rate
    Agya Atabani Adi
    Samuel Paabu Adda
    Amadi Kingsley Wobilor
    [J]. SN Business & Economics, 2 (6):
  • [10] Oil Price Shocks and Volatility in Australian Stock Returns
    Ratti, Ronald A.
    Hasan, M. Zahid
    [J]. ECONOMIC RECORD, 2013, 89 : 67 - 83