GATS and universities: Implications for research

被引:1
|
作者
Packham, DE [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bath, EAS, Ctr Mat Res, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
关键词
General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS); higher education; aims of education; Dearing Report; educational values; instrumental science; Merton's norms; Mode; 2; knowledge; postmodemism; quality in higher education; subject benchmark statements;
D O I
10.1007/s11948-003-0022-0
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The likely impact of applying the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) to higher education are examined GATS aims to "open up" services to competition: no preference can be shown to national or government providers. The consequences for teaching are likely to be that private companies, with degree-awarding powers, would be eligible for the same subsidies as public providers. Appealing to the inadequate recently introduced "benchmark" statements as proof of quality, they would provide a "bare bones" service at lower cost. Public subsidies would go: education being reduced to that minimum which could be packaged in terms of verifiable "learning outcomes". The loss of "higher" aspirations, such education of critically-minded citizens of a democratic and civilised society would impoverish the university's research culture which demands honesty and openness to public scrutiny. Most university research is substantially supported by public subsidy. Under GATS discipline, commercial providers of research services could be entitled to similar public subsidies. Publicly funded fundamental research would fade, leaving university research totally dependent for funds upon the good will of industry and commerce. Present problems, such as the suppression of unwelcome results and the use of questionable results to manipulate public opinion, would considerably increase. The public would lose. a prime source of trustworthy knowledge, needed in political discourse, legal disputation, consumer protection and in many other contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 100
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条