Animal research. A bioethical reflection

被引：5

作者：

Franco, Ana Lucia ^{[1
]}

Nogueira, Marianne Nicole M. ^{[2
]}

Kalatzis Sousa, Natalia Guimaraes ^{[3
]}

da Frota, Matheus Franco ^{[3
]}

Fernandes, Clemente Maia S. ^{[4
]}

Serra, Monica da Costa ^{[5
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Estadual Paulista, Fac Odontol Araraquara, Dept Mat Odontol & Protese, Sao Paulo, Brazil

[2] Univ Estadual Paulista, Fac Odontol Araraquara, Dept Periodontia, Sao Paulo, Brazil

[3] Univ Estadual Paulista, Fac Odontol Araraquara, Dept Endodontia, Sao Paulo, Brazil

[4] Univ Sao Paulo, BR-05508 Sao Paulo, Brazil

[5] Univ Estadual Paulista, Fac Odontol Araraquara, Disciplina Et & Bioet, Dept Odontol Social, Sao Paulo, Brazil

来源：

ACTA BIOETHICA | 2014年 / 20卷 / 02期

关键词：

bioethics; research ethics; experimentation with animals; animal welfare;

D O I：

10.4067/S1726-569X2014000200012

中图分类号：

B82 [伦理学（道德学）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Animal models are an important tool in scientific research. It is known that this practice must be based on bioethical principles in order to impose limits about pain and suffering, or for inspecting proceedings and research site. This study has as aim to evaluate and present current legislation ruling animal research in Brazil, comparing it with other countries, as well as fostering bioethical reflection about this issue. For this, we present current Brazilian legislation and we have carried out international literature review and discussion. The articles were searched in PubMed data base, using the key words "bioethics" and "animal welfare". Nineteen articles from 1997 to 2013 were included. It was concluded the evident contribution of animal research for scientific research in several fields. It is morally relevant for humans, as rational beings, to secure humane treatment to animals contributing to research. The safest way to follow this path is establishing clear norms and studies well designed, involving society for assigning ethical norms. Thus, animal welfare would be guarantee.

引用

页码：247 / 253

页数：7

共 50 条

[1] Bioethical dilemmas in using animal in medical research. Challenges and opportunities
Rogozea, Liliana Marcela
Diaconescu, Daniela Eugenia
Dinu, Eleonora Antoaneta
Badea, Oana
Popa, Daniela
Andreescu, Oana
Leasu, Florin Gabriel
[J]. ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY AND EMBRYOLOGY, 2015, 56 (03): : 1227 - 1231
[2] Scientific Research. A Reflection
Corona Lisboa, Jose
[J]. MEDISUR-REVISTA DE CIENCIAS MEDICAS DE CIENFUEGOS, 2016, 14 (03): : 243 - 244
[3] Animal experiments in biomedical research.
Lindl, T
Völkel, M
Kolar, R
[J]. ALTEX-ALTERNATIVEN ZU TIEREXPERIMENTEN, 2005, 22 (03): : 143 - 151
[4] Method or methods for bioethic research. A reflection
Manrique Nava, Carolina
Dominguez Marquez, Octaviano
[J]. ACTA BIOETHICA, 2007, 13 (01): : 125 - 126
[5] History as a teacher for animal imitation research.
Loredo Narciandi, Jose Carlos
Martin Ordas, Gema
[J]. REVISTA DE HISTORIA DE LA PSICOLOGIA, 2009, 30 (2-3): : 187 - 194
[6] An operating table for use in animal research.
Stebbins, K
[J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1913, 57 : 435 - 437
[7] Methodical examination of analgesic substance in animal research.
Starkenstein, E
[J]. NAUNYN-SCHMIEDEBERGS ARCHIV FUR EXPERIMENTELLE PATHOLOGIE UND PHARMAKOLOGIE, 1932, 165 : 325 - 338
[8] Purposes of nutrition research. Perspectives from a historical reflection
Lecerf, Jean-Michel
[J]. SCIENCES SOCIALES ET SANTE, 2016, 34 (02): : 37 - 43
[9] Levels of reflection in action research. An overview and an assessment tool
El-Dib, Mervat Abou Baker
[J]. TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2007, 23 (01) : 24 - 35
[10] Bioethical problems in Judaic reflection
Szymczyk, Marta
[J]. DIAMETROS, 2007, 13 : 102 - 104

← 1 2 3 4 5 →