Hazelnut allergy:: A double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge multicenter study

被引:127
|
作者
Ortolani, C
Ballmer-Weber, BK
Hansen, KS
Ispano, M
Wüthrich, B
Bindslev-Jensen, C
Ansaloni, R
Vannucci, L
Pravettoni, V
Scibilia, J
Poulsen, LK
Pastorello, EA
机构
[1] AO Niguarda Hosp, UO Med Gen 1, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Allergy Unit, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Natl Univ Hosp, Allergy Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Dermatol, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
[5] Univ Milan, Ist Med Interna Malattie Infett & Immunol, Milan, Italy
关键词
food allergy; hypersensitivity; oral allergy syndrome; double-blind; placebo-controlled food challenge; hazelnut allergy;
D O I
10.1067/mai.2000.103052
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Tree nuts are a common cause of food allergy in Europe. However, few studies deal with real food allergy to hazelnuts in subjects believed to be allergic to this food. Objective: We sought to select subjects with a history of allergic reactions on ingestion of hazelnut and determine how many of these have true allergy by means of the double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC), Methods: Eighty-six subjects with a history of symptoms after hazelnut ingestion were recruited from 3 allergy centers (Milan, Zurich, and Copenhagen). All subjects underwent skin prick tests (SPTs) with aeroallergens and hazelnut, as well as having their specific hazelnut IgE levels determined. Diagnosis of clinical relevant food allergy Mas made on the basis of the DBPCFC. Results: Sixty-seven (77.9%) of 86 subjects had a positive DBPCFC result: 8 were placebo responders, and II were non-responders. Of the 11 nonresponders, 4 had positive open-challenge test results. Of the DBPCFC-positive subjects, 87% also had positive skin test responses to birch pollen extract. Specific IgE determination for hazelnut ((positive CAP response 0.7 kU/L, [ie, class 2]) showed a sensitivity of 0.75, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.92, a specificity of 0.16, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.05. Skin tests with commercial hazelnut extract produced a sensitivity of 0.89, a PPV of 0.92, a specificity of 0.05, and an NPV of 0.05, Skin tests with natural food produced a sensitivity of 0.88, a PPV of 0.94, a specificity of 0.27, and an NPV of 0.15. Conclusion: This study shows that hazelnut is an allergenic source that can cause real food allergy, as confirmed by DBPCFC. Skin and IgE tests demonstrated reasonable sensitivity and PPV but a very lon specificity and NP); thus implying that these should not be used to validate the diagnosis of food allergy to hazelnut.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 581
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Food Challenge Is Essential In Primary Hazelnut Allergy Diagnosis
    Ke, Danbing
    Mazer, Bruce
    Lejtenyi, Duncan
    Beaudette, Liane
    St-Pierre, Yvan
    Gabrielli, Sofianne
    Upton, Julia
    Ben-Shoshan, Moshe
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2020, 145 (02) : AB230 - AB230
  • [2] Development of hazelnut allergy after a negative double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge
    Masthoff, L.
    Flinterman, A.
    Akkerdaas, J.
    Van Hoffen, E.
    Knulst, A.
    Meijer, Y.
    Pasmans, S.
    ALLERGY, 2010, 65 : 80 - 80
  • [3] Double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge protocol to peanut and hazelnut
    Voutilainen, H.
    Kukkonen, A.
    Kuitunen, M.
    Pelkonen, A.
    Makela, M.
    ALLERGY, 2012, 67 : 370 - 370
  • [4] Kiwi fruit allergy:: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, food challenge study
    Alemán, A
    Quirce, S
    Carnés, J
    Fernández-Caldas, E
    De las Heras, M
    Sastre, J
    Cuesta, J
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2002, 109 (01) : S218 - S219
  • [5] Sublingual immunotherapy for hazelnut food allergy:: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a standardized hazelnut extract
    Enrique, E
    Pineda, F
    Malek, T
    Bartra, J
    Basagaña, M
    Tella, R
    Castelló, JV
    Alonso, R
    de Mateo, JA
    Cerdá-Trias, T
    Miguel-Moncín, MDM
    Monzón, S
    García, M
    Palacios, R
    Cisteró-Bahíma, A
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2005, 116 (05) : 1073 - 1079
  • [6] DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED FOOD CHALLENGE
    KLEIN, GL
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1990, 85 (01) : 139 - 139
  • [7] Maize food allergy: a double-blind placebo-controlled study
    Scibilia, J.
    Pastorello, E. A.
    Zisa, G.
    Ottolenghi, A.
    Ballmer-Weber, B.
    Pravettoni, V.
    Scovena, E.
    Robino, A.
    Ortolani, C.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2008, 38 (12): : 1943 - 1949
  • [9] CHOCOLATE ALLERGY EVALUATED BY DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED FOOD CHALLENGE (DBPCFC)
    DRELICH, JM
    ANDERSON, JA
    SEARSEWALD, DA
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1993, 91 (01) : 342 - 342
  • [10] Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, food allergy challenge to olestra snacks
    Burks, AW
    Christie, L
    Althage, KA
    Kesler, JM
    Allgood, GS
    REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 34 (02) : 178 - 181