Consociational Settlements and Reconstruction: Bosnia in Comparative Perspective (1995-Present)

被引:5
|
作者
Stroschein, Sherrill [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, London WC1E 6BT, England
关键词
Bosnia; Northern Ireland; consociationalism; consociational; Dayton Agreement; international aid; peace agreements; NORTHERN-IRELAND; AGREEMENT; DAYTON;
D O I
10.1177/0002716214544459
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Both Bosnia in 1995 and Northern Ireland in 1998 were extremely fragile in the immediate aftermath of brokered peace negotiations. Each instituted a form of consociationalisma government that institutionalizes a voice for each ethnic groupas an element of brokered peace. In this article, I examine Bosnian postwar governance with comparative insights from Northern Ireland. Bosnia was the recipient of a large amount of international aid. While this aid was crucial to the initial state-building effort, the problems Bosnia now faces are due to its consociational governance structure. Some of the group-based aspects of consociationalism are in tension with individual rights, a problem that cannot be addressed by aid alone.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 115
页数:19
相关论文
共 32 条