A Comparison of 1000 Hz to 30 Hz Spinal Cord Stimulation Strategies in Patients with Unilateral Neuropathic Leg Pain Due to Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Clinical Study (HALO)

被引:8
|
作者
Breel, Jennifer [1 ,4 ]
Wille, Frank [1 ,4 ]
Wensing, Agnes G. C. L. [1 ]
Kallewaard, Jan Willem [1 ,2 ]
Pelleboer, Harmen [3 ]
Zuidema, Xander [1 ,4 ]
Burger, Katja [5 ]
de Graaf, Stijn [3 ]
Hollmann, Markus W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Locat AMC, Dept Anesthesiol, H1-156,Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Rijnstate, Dept Anesthesiol, Arnhem, Netherlands
[3] Noordwest Ziekenhuisgrp, Dept Anesthesiol, Alkmaar, Netherlands
[4] Diakonessen Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Zeist, Netherlands
[5] Alrijne Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Leiderdorp, Netherlands
关键词
Chronic pain; Neurostimulation; Pain suppression; Quality of life; Sleep; Patient-reported outcomes; Satisfaction; Patient preference; 10-KHZ HIGH-FREQUENCY; EFFICACY; TRIAL; LIFE;
D O I
10.1007/s40122-021-00268-7
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Multicenter, randomized, double-blinded crossover study. The Netherlands (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02112474). We hypothesized that the pain suppressive effects of 1000 Hz and 30 Hz spinal cord stimulation (SCS) strategies are equally effective in patients with chronic, neuropathic, unilateral leg pain after back surgery. Methods Thirty-two patients (18-70 years, minimum leg pain 50 mm on 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), minimal back pain) were randomized (1:1) to start 1000 Hz or 30 Hz neurostimulation for 9 days. After a 5-day washout, they crossed over, for another 9 days. Primary outcome was pain suppression (mean of VAS scores 4x/day) during the crossover period. The main investigators were blinded to strategy allocation, patients were blinded to the outcome, a blinded assessor analyzed the primary outcome. Results The primary outcome was analyzed in 26 patients. There was no period effect (delta 4 mm, p = 0.42, 95% CI [- 5, 13]), allowing direct intrapatient comparison of the treatment effect (delta 1 mm, p = 0.92, 95% CI [- 13, 14]). Ninety-two percent of patients in both periods experienced greater than 34% pain suppression (minimal clinically important difference, MCID). Secondary outcomes (22 patients): pain suppression and improved quality of life were sustained at 12 months; both were statistically significant and clinically relevant. Fifty percent of patients had greater than 80% pain suppression (p < 0.001). At study termination, all events were resolved; no unanticipated events were reported. Medtronic provided a grant for additional study costs. Conclusion We conclude that our hypothesis regarding the effect of 1000 Hz and 30 Hz stimulation strategies on pain suppression was confirmed. Both stimulation strategies led to a large, sustainable, clinically relevant pain suppression and improvement in quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:1189 / 1202
页数:14
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] A Comparison of 1000 Hz to 30 Hz Spinal Cord Stimulation Strategies in Patients with Unilateral Neuropathic Leg Pain Due to Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Clinical Study (HALO)
    Jennifer Breel
    Frank Wille
    Agnes G. C. L. Wensing
    Jan Willem Kallewaard
    Harmen Pelleboer
    Xander Zuidema
    Katja Bürger
    Stijn de Graaf
    Markus W. Hollmann
    Pain and Therapy, 2021, 10 : 1189 - 1202
  • [2] Multicolumn spinal cord stimulation for predominant back pain in failed back surgery syndrome patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
    Rigoard, Philippe
    Basu, Surajit
    Desai, Mehul
    Taylor, Rod
    Annemans, Lieven
    Tan, Ye
    Johnson, Mary Jo
    Van den Abeele, Carine
    North, Richard
    Deruytter, Marc
    Vangeneugden, Johan
    Galan, Vincent
    Villareal, Armando
    van Eijs, Frank
    Buwembo, Joseph
    Noriega, David
    Bhatia, Sanjay
    Tallarico, Eric
    Remacle, Jean-Michel
    Bojanic, Stana
    To-Nhu Vu
    Raftopoulos, Christian
    Jaramillo, Santiago
    Eif, Marcus
    Yepes, Carlos
    Lopez, Adrian
    Van Havenbergh, Tony
    Houden, Timothy
    Burnette, Candice
    Edmiston, Bart
    Mehta, Neel
    March, Guillermo Garcia
    Lad, Shivanand P.
    Pilitsis, Julie
    PAIN, 2019, 160 (06) : 1410 - 1420
  • [3] Comparison of conventional, burst and high-frequency spinal cord stimulation on pain relief in refractory failed back surgery syndrome patients: study protocol for a prospective randomized double-blinded cross-over trial (MULTIWAVE study)
    Billot, Maxime
    Naiditch, Nicolas
    Brandet, Claire
    Lorgeoux, Bertille
    Baron, Sandrine
    Ounajim, Amine
    Roulaud, Manuel
    Roy-Moreau, Aline
    de Montgazon, Geraldine
    Charrier, Elodie
    Misbert, Lorraine
    Maillard, Benjamin
    Vendeuvre, Tanguy
    Rigoard, Philippe
    TRIALS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [4] Comparison of conventional, burst and high-frequency spinal cord stimulation on pain relief in refractory failed back surgery syndrome patients: study protocol for a prospective randomized double-blinded cross-over trial (MULTIWAVE study)
    Maxime Billot
    Nicolas Naiditch
    Claire Brandet
    Bertille Lorgeoux
    Sandrine Baron
    Amine Ounajim
    Manuel Roulaud
    Aline Roy-Moreau
    Géraldine de Montgazon
    Elodie Charrier
    Lorraine Misbert
    Benjamin Maillard
    Tanguy Vendeuvre
    Philippe Rigoard
    Trials, 21
  • [5] The response of neuropathic pain and pain in complex regional pain syndrome I to carbamazepine and sustained-release morphine in patients pretreated with spinal cord stimulation: A double-blinded randomized study
    Harke, H
    Gretenkort, P
    Ladleif, HU
    Rahman, S
    Harke, O
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2001, 92 (02): : 488 - 495
  • [6] Spinal cord stimulation for predominant low back pain in failed back surgery syndrome: study protocol for an international multicenter randomized controlled trial (PROMISE study)
    Rigoard, Philippe
    Desai, Mehul J.
    North, Richard B.
    Taylor, Rod S.
    Annemans, Lieven
    Greening, Christine
    Tan, Ye
    Van den Abeele, Carine
    Shipley, Jane
    Kumar, Krishna
    TRIALS, 2013, 14
  • [7] Spinal cord stimulation for predominant low back pain in failed back surgery syndrome: study protocol for an international multicenter randomized controlled trial (PROMISE study)
    Philippe Rigoard
    Mehul J Desai
    Richard B North
    Rod S Taylor
    Lieven Annemans
    Christine Greening
    Ye Tan
    Carine Van den Abeele
    Jane Shipley
    Krishna Kumar
    Trials, 14
  • [8] Treatment of failed back surgery syndrome patients with low back and leg pain: A pilot study of a new dual lead spinal cord stimulation system
    Van Buyten, JP
    Van Zundert, J
    Milbouw, G
    NEUROMODULATION, 1999, 2 (04): : 258 - 265
  • [9] Comparison of Paresthesia Mapping to Anatomical Placement in Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation: Initial Trial Results of the Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover, CRISP Study
    De Ridder, Dirk
    NEUROMODULATION, 2020, 23 (05): : 619 - 619
  • [10] Subcutaneous Stimulation as ADD-ON Therapy to Spinal Cord Stimulation Is Effective in Treating Low Back Pain in Patients With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
    van Gorp, Eric-Jan J. A. A.
    Teernstra, Onno P. M.
    Gultuna, Ismail
    Hamm-Faber, Tanja
    Burger, Katja
    Schapendonk, Ronald
    Kallewaard, Jan Willem
    Spincemaille, Geert
    Vonhogen, Leon H.
    Hendriks, Jan C. M.
    Vissers, Kris C. P.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2016, 19 (02): : 171 - 178