Integrating land surface phenology with cluster density and size improves spatially explicit models of animal density

被引:6
|
作者
Butler, Matthew J. [1 ]
Sesnie, Steven E. [1 ]
Timmer, Jennifer M. [2 ]
Harris, Grant [1 ]
机构
[1] US Fish & Wildlife Serv, Div Biol Serv, POB 1306, Albuquerque, NM 87103 USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Grad Degree Program Ecol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
Aerial survey; Cluster size; Hierarchical distance sampling; Landcover; MODIS; NDVI; Oil and natural gas; Plant senescence; Prairie grouse; Zero-truncated negative binomial; PRAIRIE-CHICKEN POPULATIONS; TIME-SERIES; COVER DATABASE; VEGETATION; HABITAT; CLASSIFICATION; ABUNDANCE; CONSERVATION; ALGORITHM; LEKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.046
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Models of animal density often use coarse landcover categories that homogenize vegetation attributes, thereby limiting specificity of results. Alternatively, models including land surface phenology (LSP) metrics derived from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) satellite imagery capture continuous time-series data describing plant growth and senescence. LSP metrics may better discriminate the vegetation conditions influencing species habitat and distribution. Additionally, applications modeling animal density often use clusters (i.e., groups of individuals) but omit differences in cluster sizes. Ignoring how cluster size varies with landscape characteristics risks misrepresenting the spatial distribution of an animals' density. Using lesser prairie-chickens (LEPC; Tympanuchus pallidicinctus) as an example, we integrated the spatial distributions of cluster density and cluster size with LSP metrics to better predict its density in Texas, USA. We modeled LEPC cluster density using hierarchical distance sampling and cluster size with zero-truncated generalized linear modeling. Variables included landcover categories, LSP metrics, human infrastructure and topography. Models incorporating LSP metrics received most support and identified conservation areas that landcover models missed. Cluster density associated with LSP metrics, road density, oil and gas well density, topography, and grassland to shrubland ratio. Cluster size associated with topography and LSP metrics. Omitting the spatial distribution of cluster size underestimated LEPC density. Our approach generates geospatial predictions for prioritizing LEPC protection, habitat restoration, and evaluating impacts from development or phenological change. This study demonstrates the utility of integrating LSP metrics, cluster density and cluster size for predicting species density across large and heterogeneous landscapes. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 62
页数:12
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Spatially-explicit models of global tree density
    Glick, Henry B.
    Bettigole, Charlie
    Maynard, Daniel S.
    Covey, Kristofer R.
    Smith, Jeffrey R.
    Crowther, Thomas W.
    SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2016, 3
  • [2] Spatially-explicit models of global tree density
    Henry B. Glick
    Charlie Bettigole
    Daniel S. Maynard
    Kristofer R. Covey
    Jeffrey R. Smith
    Thomas W. Crowther
    Scientific Data, 3
  • [3] Program SPACECAP: software for estimating animal density using spatially explicit capture-recapture models
    Gopalaswamy, Arjun M.
    Royle, J. Andrew
    Hines, James E.
    Singh, Pallavi
    Jathanna, Devcharan
    Kumar, N. Samba
    Karanth, K. Ullas
    METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2012, 3 (06): : 1067 - 1072
  • [4] Animal Density Estimation for Large Unmarked Populations Using a Spatially Explicit Model
    Herliansyah, Riki
    King, Ruth
    Rahman, Dede Aulia
    King, Stuart
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL STATISTICS, 2025, 30 (01) : 193 - 210
  • [5] Spatially explicit spreadsheet modelling for optimising the efficiency of reducing invasive animal density
    McMahon, Clive R.
    Brook, Barry W.
    Collier, Neil
    Bradshaw, Corey J. A.
    METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2010, 1 (01): : 53 - 68
  • [6] Integrating field and satellite data for spatially explicit inference on the density of threatened arboreal primates
    Cavada, Nathalie
    Ciolli, Marco
    Rocchini, Duccio
    Barelli, Claudia
    Marshall, Andrew R.
    Rovero, Francesco
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2017, 27 (01) : 235 - 243
  • [7] SPATIALLY EXPLICIT MODELS FOR INFERENCE ABOUT DENSITY IN UNMARKED OR PARTIALLY MARKED POPULATIONS
    Chandler, Richard B.
    Royle, J. Andrew
    ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2013, 7 (02): : 936 - 954
  • [8] A spatially explicit land surface phenology data product for science, monitoring and natural resources management applications
    Broich, Mark
    Huete, Alfredo
    Paget, Matt
    Ma, Xuanlong
    Tulbure, Mirela
    Coupe, Natalia Restrepo
    Evans, Bradley
    Beringer, Jason
    Devadas, Rakhesh
    Davies, Kevin
    Held, Alex
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2015, 64 : 191 - 204
  • [9] Dingo Density Estimates and Movements in Equatorial Australia: Spatially Explicit Mark-Resight Models
    Gabriele-Rivet, Vanessa
    Arsenault, Julie
    Brookes, Victoria J.
    Fleming, Peter J. S.
    Nury, Charlotte
    Ward, Michael P.
    ANIMALS, 2020, 10 (05):
  • [10] Density-dependent home-range size revealed by spatially explicit capture-recapture
    Efford, M. G.
    Dawson, D. K.
    Jhala, Y. V.
    Qureshi, Q.
    ECOGRAPHY, 2016, 39 (07) : 676 - 688