The difference between perceived video quality and objective video quality

被引:2
|
作者
Sun, Huey-Min [1 ]
Huang, Yan-Kai [1 ]
机构
[1] Chang Jung Christian Univ, Dept Informat Management, Tainan 711, Taiwan
关键词
Content characteristic; Bit rate; Subjective measurement; Objective measurement; PERCEPTION; PSNR;
D O I
10.1007/s12650-009-0013-6
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
We select 93 video sequences encoded/decoded by Microsoft MPEG-4 software to classify them into six different content characteristics by the cluster analysis and the discriminant analysis in this study. We compare the peak signal noise ratio (PSNR) of objective video quality evaluation with the mean opinion score of subjective quality evaluation to understand their difference by varying different bit rate. We find that the acceptable satisfaction of user perceived quality for different motion and texture characteristics is significantly different in varying the bit rates. For the low motion and simple texture characteristic (Type 1) and the low motion and complex texture characteristic (Type 4), when the bit rate is 2,000 kbps, the tolerable discarded ratio is allowed to 44% and 49%, and the PSNR is 41.7 dB and 41.0 dB, subjects could perceive the acceptable satisfaction of video quality. For the middle motion and simple texture characteristic (Type 2) and the high motion and simple texture characteristic (Type 3), when the bit rate needs around 3,000 kbps, the tolerable discarded ratio must be controlled below 12% and 34%, and the PSNR is 45.2 dB and 41.7 dB, subjects could perceive the acceptable satisfaction of video quality. For the middle motion and complex texture characteristic (Type 5) and the high motion and complex texture characteristic (Type 6), when the bit rate is 6,000 kbps, the tolerable discarded ratio is allowed to 14%, and the PSNR is 43.2 dB and 42.9 dB, subjects could perceive the acceptable satisfaction of video quality.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 168
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The difference between perceived video quality and objective video quality
    Huey-Min Sun
    Yan-Kai Huang
    [J]. Journal of Visualization, 2010, 13 : 159 - 168
  • [2] Subjective video quality prediction based on objective video quality metrics
    Alizadeh, M.
    Sharifkhani, M.
    [J]. 2018 4TH IRANIAN CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL PROCESSING AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (ICSPIS), 2018, : 7 - 9
  • [3] Comparing Subjective Perceived Quality with Objective Video Quality by Content Characteristics and Bit Rates
    Sun, Huey-Min
    Huang, Yan-Kai
    [J]. 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEW TRENDS IN INFORMATION AND SERVICE SCIENCE (NISS 2009), VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 624 - 629
  • [4] Objective video quality assessment
    Lee, C
    Cho, S
    Choe, J
    Jeong, T
    Ahn, W
    Lee, E
    [J]. OPTICAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 45 (01)
  • [5] Objective video quality metrics
    Vranjes, M.
    Rimac-Drlje, S.
    Zagar, D.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS ELMAR 2007, 2007, : 45 - 49
  • [6] An Objective Video Quality Metric for Compressed Stereoscopic Video
    Seo, Jungdong
    Liu, Xingang
    Kim, Donghyun
    Sohn, Kwanghoon
    [J]. CIRCUITS SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2012, 31 (03) : 1089 - 1107
  • [7] An Objective Video Quality Metric for Compressed Stereoscopic Video
    Jungdong Seo
    Xingang Liu
    Donghyun Kim
    Kwanghoon Sohn
    [J]. Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing, 2012, 31 : 1089 - 1107
  • [8] Understanding the perceived quality of video predictions
    Somraj, Nagabhushan
    Kashi, Manoj Surya
    Arun, S. P.
    Soundararajan, Rajiv
    [J]. SIGNAL PROCESSING-IMAGE COMMUNICATION, 2022, 102
  • [9] Methods for objective measurement of video quality
    Lee, C
    Kwon, O
    [J]. 6TH WORLD MULTICONFERENCE ON SYSTEMICS, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, VOL III, PROCEEDINGS: IMAGE, ACOUSTIC, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING I, 2002, : 92 - 96
  • [10] Objective quality evaluation of digital video
    Wang, NN
    Zhang, Q
    Li, GL
    [J]. 2000 IEEE ASIA-PACIFIC CONFERENCE ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS: ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2000, : 791 - 794