POLITICAL RISK AS A HOLD-UP PROBLEM: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTEGRATED STRATEGY

被引:7
|
作者
Shotts, Kenneth W. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Grad Sch Business, Polit Econ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Princetons Woodrow Wilson Sch Publ & Int Affairs, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[5] Hoover Inst War Revolut & Peace, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[6] Ctr Adv Study Behav Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
STRATEGY BEYOND MARKETS | 2016年 / 34卷
关键词
Economic development; political risk; integrated strategy; government relations; international business; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; INSTITUTIONS; ECONOMY; NATIONALIZATION; EXPROPRIATION; CORPORATIONS; COMMITMENT; DEMOCRACY; CONFLICT;
D O I
10.1108/S0742-332220160000034003
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper explores firms' strategic options when their investments are subject to the threat of government expropriation. I develop a simple hold-up model of political risk. In the model, a firm decides whether to invest and then the government decides whether to expropriate the firm's investment or to simply collect normal taxes on its profits. The government is motivated by revenue and a wide range of nonpecuniary factors: its reputation, electoral pressures, patronage opportunities, and pressure from external actors. In the model, the likelihood of expropriation depends on several factors: the firm's profits, the amount of taxes it pays, the government's ability to operate the firm's assets, and the government's political incentives. Effective management of political risk requires an integrated strategy, consisting not only of public and government relations efforts, but also financial, value chain, and human resources strategies designed to reduce the government's incentives for expropriation.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 85
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Collective goods and the political hold-up problem
    Deng, FF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL AND THEORETICAL ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE GESAMTE STAATSWISSENSCHAFT, 2003, 159 (02): : 414 - 434
  • [2] Is there a hold-up problem?
    Ellingsen, T
    Johannesson, M
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 106 (03): : 475 - 494
  • [3] Information and the hold-up problem
    Hermalin, Benjamin E.
    Katz, Michael L.
    [J]. RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2009, 40 (03): : 405 - 423
  • [4] CONTRACTUAL SOLUTIONS TO THE HOLD-UP PROBLEM
    ROGERSON, WP
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1992, 59 (04): : 777 - 794
  • [5] Ambivalent investment and the hold-up problem
    Reiche, Sonje
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2006, 4 (06) : 1148 - 1164
  • [6] Ownership, incentives, and the hold-up problem
    Baldenius, Tim
    [J]. RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2006, 37 (02): : 276 - 299
  • [7] Unobservable investment and the hold-up problem
    Gul, F
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 2001, 69 (02) : 343 - 376
  • [8] Information and bargaining in the hold-up problem
    Lau, Stephanie
    [J]. RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2008, 39 (01): : 266 - 282
  • [9] The hold-up problem in a repeated relationship
    Castaneda, Marco A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2006, 24 (05) : 953 - 970
  • [10] The hold-up problem in government contracting
    Bos, D
    Lulfesmann, C
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1996, 98 (01): : 53 - 74