Characterizing the oligogenic architecture of plant growth phenotypes informs genomic selection approaches in a common wheat population

被引:13
|
作者
DeWitt, Noah [1 ,2 ]
Guedira, Mohammed [1 ]
Lauer, Edwin [1 ]
Murphy, J. Paul [1 ]
Marshall, David [2 ]
Mergoum, Mohamed [3 ]
Johnson, Jerry [3 ]
Holland, James B. [1 ,2 ]
Brown-Guedira, Gina [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] USDA ARS, SEA, Plant Sci Res, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
Triticum aestivum; QTL mapping; Genetic architecture; Genomic selection; MAJOR DWARFING GENES; WINTER-WHEAT; BREAD WHEAT; GRAIN-YIELD; HEIGHT; RHT8; REQUIREMENT; DURATION; BARLEY; REGION;
D O I
10.1186/s12864-021-07574-6
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
BackgroundGenetic variation in growth over the course of the season is a major source of grain yield variation in wheat, and for this reason variants controlling heading date and plant height are among the best-characterized in wheat genetics. While the major variants for these traits have been cloned, the importance of these variants in contributing to genetic variation for plant growth over time is not fully understood. Here we develop a biparental population segregating for major variants for both plant height and flowering time to characterize the genetic architecture of the traits and identify additional novel QTL.ResultsWe find that additive genetic variation for both traits is almost entirely associated with major and moderate-effect QTL, including four novel heading date QTL and four novel plant height QTL. FT2 and Vrn-A3 are proposed as candidate genes underlying QTL on chromosomes 3A and 7A, while Rht8 is mapped to chromosome 2D. These mapped QTL also underlie genetic variation in a longitudinal analysis of plant growth over time. The oligogenic architecture of these traits is further demonstrated by the superior trait prediction accuracy of QTL-based prediction models compared to polygenic genomic selection models.ConclusionsIn a population constructed from two modern wheat cultivars adapted to the southeast U.S., almost all additive genetic variation in plant growth traits is associated with known major variants or novel moderate-effect QTL. Major transgressive segregation was observed in this population despite the similar plant height and heading date characters of the parental lines. This segregation is being driven primarily by a small number of mapped QTL, instead of by many small-effect, undetected QTL. As most breeding populations in the southeast U.S. segregate for known QTL for these traits, genetic variation in plant height and heading date in these populations likely emerges from similar combinations of major and moderate effect QTL. We can make more accurate and cost-effective prediction models by targeted genotyping of key SNPs.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] Characterizing the oligogenic architecture of plant growth phenotypes informs genomic selection approaches in a common wheat population
    Noah DeWitt
    Mohammed Guedira
    Edwin Lauer
    J. Paul Murphy
    David Marshall
    Mohamed Mergoum
    Jerry Johnson
    James B. Holland
    Gina Brown-Guedira
    [J]. BMC Genomics, 22
  • [2] An Overview of Genomic Approaches for Characterizing the Genetic Architecture of Growth Traits in Chickens
    Manjula, Prabuddha
    Cho, Sunghyun
    Seo, Dongwon
    Yamauchi, Nobuhiko
    Lee, Jun Heon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE KYUSHU UNIVERSITY, 2020, 65 (01): : 65 - 78
  • [3] Wheat breeding history reveals synergistic selection of pleiotropic genomic sites for plant architecture and grain yield
    Li, Aili
    Hao, Chenyang
    Wang, Zhenyu
    Geng, Shuaifeng
    Jia, Meiling
    Wang, Fang
    Han, Xiang
    Kong, Xingchen
    Yin, Lingjie
    Tao, Shu
    Deng, Zhongyin
    Liao, Ruyi
    Sun, Guoliang
    Wang, Ke
    Ye, Xingguo
    Jiao, Chengzhi
    Lu, Hongfeng
    Zhou, Yun
    Liu, Dengcai
    Fu, Xiangdong
    Zhang, Xueyong
    Mao, Long
    [J]. MOLECULAR PLANT, 2022, 15 (03) : 504 - 519