Decarbonization of the Indian electricity sector: Technology choices and policy trade-offs

被引:11
|
作者
Rudnick, Ivan [1 ]
Duenas-Martinez, Pablo [1 ]
Botterud, Audun [2 ]
Papageorgiou, Dimitri J. [3 ]
Mignone, Bryan K. [3 ]
Rajagopalan, Srinivasan [3 ]
Harper, Michael R. [3 ]
Ganesan, Karthik [4 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Energy Initiat, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] MIT, Lab Informat & Decis Syst, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[3] ExxonMobil Res & Engn Co, Corp Strateg Res, Annandale, NJ 08801 USA
[4] Council Energy Environm & Water, Delhi 110067, India
关键词
RENEWABLE ENERGY; CARBON; IMPACTS; SYSTEM; EFFICIENCY; STANDARDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.isci.2022.104017
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
India is the third largest CO2 emitterworldwide, and its electricity demand, which is primarily supplied by coal-fired generation, is expected to increase almost threefold over the next twenty years. Here, we simulate 40 scenarios for the 2040 Indian electricity sector, considering uncertainty in future natural gas prices and costs for batteries and variable renewable energy (VRE) technologies, under different CO2 emissions limits and renewable portfolio standard (RPS) targets. We find a large-scale expansion of VRE, particularly, solar PV, in most scenarios. Furthermore, energy storage competes with natural gas and coal to provide flexibility to integrate VRE. Given a set of technology assumptions, policies that explicitly limit CO2 emissions are more cost- effective at reducing emissions than RPS policies. The former are also more effective at reducing air pollution than RPS policies by explicitly penalizing CO2 emissions, thereby reducing coal generation more substantially than RPS policies.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Land use trade-offs in decarbonization of electricity generation in the American West
    Patankar, Neha
    Sarkela-Basset, Xiili
    Schivley, Greg
    Leslie, Emily
    Jenkins, Jesse
    [J]. ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2023, 4
  • [2] Systematic review of the outcomes and trade-offs of ten types of decarbonization policy instruments
    Cristina Peñasco
    Laura Díaz Anadón
    Elena Verdolini
    [J]. Nature Climate Change, 2021, 11 : 257 - 265
  • [3] The implications of Brexit for the electricity sector in Great Britain: Trade-offs between market integration and policy influence
    Lockwood, Matthew
    Froggatt, Antony
    Wright, Georgina
    Dutton, Joseph
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 110 : 137 - 143
  • [4] Choices and trade-offs: reply to McGaw
    Wagemaker, Hans
    [J]. ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2008, 15 (03) : 267 - 278
  • [5] Detector choices: Considering the trade-offs
    Morey, JL
    [J]. PHOTONICS SPECTRA, 1998, 32 (05) : 178 - +
  • [6] Feeding the World in 2050: Trade-offs, synergies and tough choices for the livestock sector
    Smith, Jimmy
    Tarawali, Shirley
    Grace, Delia
    Sones, Keith
    [J]. TROPICAL GRASSLANDS-FORRAJES TROPICALES, 2013, 1 (02): : 125 - 136
  • [7] TRADE-OFFS AND ECONOMIC POLICY
    RAYNAULD, A
    [J]. RELATIONS INDUSTRIELLES-INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, 1973, 28 (01): : 1 - 16
  • [8] THE ECONOMY AND POLICY TRADE-OFFS
    Tenreyro, Silvana
    [J]. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2022, 262 : 51 - 65
  • [9] Firewall technology trade-offs
    Seachrist, D
    [J]. BYTE, 1997, 22 (06): : 132 - 132
  • [10] TRADE-OFFS IN FORMULATING A CONSISTENT NATIONAL POLICY TRADE-OFFS IN FORMULATING A CONSISTENT NATIONAL POLICY ON ADOPTION
    Hansen, Mary Eschelbach
    Pollack, Daniel
    [J]. FAMILY COURT REVIEW, 2008, 46 (02) : 366 - 374