Managerial Incentives and Investment Policy in Family Firms: Evidence from a Structural Analysis

被引:10
|
作者
Wu, Betty H. T. [1 ]
Mazur, Mieszko [2 ]
机构
[1] Adam Smith Business Sch, Accounting & Finance, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] IESEG Sch Management, Finance, Lille, France
关键词
STOCK OPTION PORTFOLIOS; EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION; AGENCY PROBLEMS; OWNERSHIP; RISK; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; SENSITIVITIES; DETERMINANTS; CONSTRAINTS;
D O I
10.1111/jsbm.12308
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper provides evidence that CEO incentive pay mediates the effect of family preferences on corporate investment policy. Our study focuses on the option portfolio volatility sensitivity vega, which motivates the risk-taking behavior of undiversified managers. After controlling for factors that affect incentive pay and investment policy simultaneously, we find that one-third of underinvestment in riskier R&D projects in active family firms can be attributed to a significantly lower vega. Passive family firms allocate more capital to R&D as opposed to active family firms, and are more active in M&A deal making. In contrast to many prior studies, pay incentives and families are not associated with capital expenditures. Overall, our empirical results suggest that CEO pay incentives induce investment policy contingent on firm risk. Family CEO incentive pay manifests the family preference for lower risk, especially in firms with higher firm risk. Nonetheless, after replacing family CEOs with outside professionals, investments in both R&D and M&A increase, which is consistent with the family preference for extended investment horizons. Interestingly, such a preference seems not to be manifested in incentive pay.
引用
收藏
页码:618 / 657
页数:40
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Investment policy at family firms: Evidence from Thailand
    Connelly, J. Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2016, 83 : 91 - 122
  • [2] Growth opportunity and investment policy: The role of managerial incentives
    Adu-Ameyaw, Emmanuel
    Danso, Albert
    Hickson, Linda
    [J]. MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2022, 43 (08) : 3634 - 3646
  • [3] Managerial compensation, family firms and firms' innovation: evidence from Indonesia
    Bintarto, Elshabyta Auditya
    Nasih, Mohammad
    Haider, Imran
    Harymawan, Iman
    Putra, Fajar Kristanto Gautama
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL AND FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING, 2022, 14 (01) : 35 - 55
  • [4] MANAGERIAL INCENTIVES AND INVESTMENT IN RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT IN LARGE MULTIPRODUCT FIRMS
    HOSKISSON, RE
    HITT, MA
    HILL, CWL
    [J]. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1993, 4 (02) : 325 - 341
  • [5] What determines the allocation of managerial ownership within firms? Evidence from investment management firms
    Dimmock, Stephen G.
    Gerken, William C.
    Marietta-Westberg, Jennifer
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2015, 30 : 44 - 64
  • [6] Managerial incentives, net debt and investment activity in all-equity firms
    Alderson, Michael
    Betker, Brian
    [J]. STUDIES IN ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2012, 29 (04) : 232 - 245
  • [7] Managerial ability in founding-family firms: evidence from Indonesia
    Simamora, Alex Johanes
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 71 (05) : 2031 - 2048
  • [8] The impact of catering incentives on the dividend policy: evidence from Turkish firms
    Takmaz, Sefa
    Evrim Mandaci, Pinar
    Durukan, M. Banu
    [J]. MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2021, 47 (07) : 897 - 914
  • [9] Tournaments and managerial incentives in China's listed firms: New evidence
    Kato, Takao
    Long, Cheryl
    [J]. CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2011, 22 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [10] Product Market Competition and Managerial Incentives: Evidence from China's Publicly Listed Firms
    Ma Hongjuan
    Du Jinmin
    [J]. STATISTIC APPLICATION IN SCIENTIFIC AND SOCIAL REFORMATION, 2010, : 462 - 466