Effects of treatment in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:217
|
作者
Horvath, Karl [1 ,2 ]
Koch, Klaus [3 ]
Jeitler, Klaus [1 ]
Matyas, Eva [1 ]
Bender, Ralf [3 ]
Bastian, Hilda [3 ]
Lange, Stefan [3 ]
Siebenhofer, Andrea [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Graz, EBM Review Ctr, A-8036 Graz, Austria
[2] Med Univ Graz, Dept Internal Med, Div Endocrinol & Nucl Med, A-8036 Graz, Austria
[3] Inst Qual & Efficiency Hlth Care IQWiG, D-51105 Cologne, Germany
[4] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Inst Gen Practice, Frankfurt, Germany
来源
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; GLUCOSE-INTOLERANCE; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; BLOOD-GLUCOSE; PREGNANCY; MANAGEMENT; INSULIN; EXERCISE; HETEROGENEITY; HYPERGLYCEMIA;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.c1395
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To summarise the benefits and harms of treatments for women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Data sources Embase, Medline, AMED, BIOSIS, CCMed, CDMS, CDSR, CENTRAL, CINAHL, DARE, HTA, NHS EED, Heclinet, SciSearch, several publishers' databases, and reference lists of relevant secondary literature up to October 2009. Review methods Included studies were randomised controlled trials of specific treatment for gestational diabetes compared with usual care or "intensified" compared with "less intensified" specific treatment. Results Five randomised controlled trials matched the inclusion criteria for specific versus usual treatment. All studies used a two step approach with a 50 g glucose challenge test or screening for risk factors, or both, and a subsequent 75 g or 100 g oral glucose tolerance test. Meta- analyses did not show significant differences for most single end points judged to be of direct clinical importance. In women specifically treated for gestational diabetes, shoulder dystocia was significantly less common (odds ratio 0.40, 95% confidence interval 0.21 to 0.75), and one randomised controlled trial reported a significant reduction of pre-eclampsia (2.5 v 5.5%, P=0.02). For the surrogate end point of large for gestational age infants, the odds ratio was 0.48 (0.38 to 0.62). In the 13 randomised controlled trials of different intensities of specific treatments, meta-analysis showed a significant reduction of shoulder dystocia in women with more intensive treatment (0.31, 0.14 to 0.70). Conclusions Treatment for gestational diabetes, consisting of treatment to lower blood glucose concentration alone or with special obstetric care, seems to lower the risk for some perinatal complications. Decisions regarding treatment should take into account that the evidence of benefit is derived from trials for which women were selected with a two step strategy (glucose challenge test/screening for risk factors and oral glucose tolerance test).
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Poolsup, Nalinee
    Suksomboon, Naeti
    Amin, Muhammad
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (03):
  • [2] Metabolic effects of breastfeed in women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ma, Shujuan
    Hu, Shimin
    Liang, Huiling
    Xiao, Yanni
    Tan, Hongzhuan
    [J]. DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2019, 35 (03)
  • [3] Gestational diabetes mellitus in women born small or preterm: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yasushi Tsujimoto
    Yuki Kataoka
    Masahiro Banno
    Shunsuke Taito
    Masayo Kokubo
    Yuko Masuzawa
    Yoshiko Yamamoto
    [J]. Endocrine, 2022, 75 : 40 - 47
  • [4] Major congenital malformations in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Balsells, M.
    Garcia-Patterson, A.
    Gich, I.
    Corcoy, R.
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2010, 53
  • [5] Gestational diabetes mellitus in women born small or preterm: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tsujimoto, Yasushi
    Kataoka, Yuki
    Banno, Masahiro
    Taito, Shunsuke
    Kokubo, Masayo
    Masuzawa, Yuko
    Yamamoto, Yoshiko
    [J]. ENDOCRINE, 2022, 75 (01) : 40 - 47
  • [6] Major congenital malformations in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Balsells, Montserrat
    Garcia-Patterson, Apolonia
    Gich, Ignasi
    Corcoy, Rosa
    [J]. DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2012, 28 (03) : 252 - 257
  • [7] Lifestyle Intervention for the Prevention of Diabetes in Women With Previous Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Goveia, Pamella
    Canon-Montanez, Wilson
    Santos, Danilo de Paula
    Lopes, Gabriela W.
    Ma, Ronald C. W.
    Duncan, Bruce B.
    Ziegelman, Patricia K.
    Schmidt, Maria Ines
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [8] Asymmetric dimethylarginine and gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tiong, Patricia
    Kosmider, Logan
    Lassi, Zohra S.
    Arstall, Margaret A.
    Andraweera, Prabha H.
    [J]. ENDOCRINE, 2023, 80 (02) : 283 - 291
  • [9] Asymmetric dimethylarginine and gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Patricia Tiong
    Logan Kosmider
    Zohra S. Lassi
    Margaret A. Arstall
    Prabha H. Andraweera
    [J]. Endocrine, 2023, 80 : 283 - 291
  • [10] Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in Pakistan: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Muhammad Adnan
    Muhammad Aasim
    [J]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 24