The associations between work stress and mental health: A comparison of organizationally employed and self-employed workers

被引:74
|
作者
Parslow, RA [1 ]
Jorm, AF
Christensen, H
Rodgers, B
Strazdins, L
D'Souza, RM
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Mental Hlth Res Ctr, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Natl Ctr Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
来源
WORK AND STRESS | 2004年 / 18卷 / 03期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
work stress; mental health; self-employed; GP service use;
D O I
10.1080/14749730412331318649
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This study examined the associations between work stressors and mental health in organizationally employed and self-employed workers, and with the numbers of general practitioner (GP) services used by these two employment groups. The participants were selected from those already taking part in the PATH Through Life Project, in Australia. A total of 2275 men and women aged from 40 to 44 years participated in a community survey and were in the labour force at the time of the interview. Those who participated entered responses into a hand-held computer under the super-vision of an interviewer. A total of 14.2% of the group identified themselves as self-employed. Respondents also provided details of their occupation and the extent to which they experienced work stressors. Some 72.6% of these participants gave consent for information on their use of GP services over a 12-month period to be obtained from national insurance records. We found that self-employed men and women reported more decision authority than the organizationally employed, while self-employed women also had more manageable job demands. Self-employment offered men no health benefit. However, women who were self-employed reported worse physical health than their organizationally employed counterparts. While work stress factors were most likely to be associated with the use of GP services by self-employed men, the use of those services by women was more strongly associated with their experiences of stress in organizational employment. Overall, self-employment was found to be associated with relatively few mental health benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 244
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Task-level work engagement of self-employed and organizationally employed high-skilled workers
    Bujacz, Aleksandra
    Bernhard-Oettel, Claudia
    Rigotti, Thomas
    Lindfors, Petra
    [J]. CAREER DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 22 (06) : 724 - 738
  • [2] Job Stress and Coping: Self-Employed versus Organizationally Employed Professionals
    Oren, Lior
    [J]. STRESS AND HEALTH, 2012, 28 (02) : 163 - 170
  • [3] Occupational Health: Comparison between Self-Employed Workers and Salaried Workers in the Private Sector
    da Silva, Luan Lima
    Ferreira, Yasmine Coutinho
    Pagotto, Daniel do Prado
    Carvalho, Jessica Borges de
    Junior, Candido Vieira Borges
    [J]. REVISTA CIENCIAS ADMINISTRATIVAS, 2024, 30
  • [4] Work-family conflict, sleep, and health: A comparison of traditional and self-employed workers
    Bettac, Erica L.
    Probst, Tahira M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANPOWER, 2021, 42 (02) : 240 - 259
  • [5] The Logics of Collective Action of Self-Employed Workers' Associations
    D'Amours, Martine
    [J]. RELATIONS INDUSTRIELLES-INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, 2010, 65 (02): : 257 - 280
  • [6] Differences in suicidal behaviors between self-employed and standardly employed workers
    Min, Jin-Young
    Kim, HyeJin
    Park, Shin-Goo
    Hwang, Sang Hee
    Min, Kyoug-Bok
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 2019, 62 (12) : 1144 - 1151
  • [7] Permeability between Work and Non-Work: The Case of Self-Employed IT Workers
    Tremblay, Diane-Gabrielle
    Genin, Emilie
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2008, 33 (04) : 701 - 720
  • [8] IT self-employed workers between constraint and flexibility
    Tremblay, Diane-Gabrielle
    Genin, Emilie
    [J]. NEW TECHNOLOGY WORK AND EMPLOYMENT, 2010, 25 (01) : 34 - 48
  • [9] Employees, Workers and the Self-Employed
    Brodie, Douglas
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL LAW JOURNAL, 2005, 34 (03) : 253 - 260