Chemosensory species recognition may reduce the frequency of hybridization between native and introduced lizards

被引:23
|
作者
Gabirot, M. [1 ]
Castilla, A. M. [2 ,3 ]
Lopez, P. [1 ]
Martin, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, Museo Nacl Ciencias Nat, Dept Ecol Evolut, E-28006 Madrid, Spain
[2] Estac Biol Sanauja, Solsona 25280, Lleida, Spain
[3] CSIC, Estac Biol Donana, Seville 41092, Spain
关键词
IBERIAN WALL LIZARDS; PODARCIS-HISPANICA-ATRATA; FEMORAL GLAND SECRETIONS; SEXUAL SELECTION; COLUMBRETES ARCHIPELAGO; MATE CHOICE; CONSERVATION; LACERTIDAE; ISLANDS; COMPLEX;
D O I
10.1139/Z09-120
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
The introduction of alien species to islands by human activity can cause catastrophic consequences for small populations of island endemics. Hybridization between the endangered and endemic insular lizard Podarcis atrata (Bosca, 1916) from the Columbretes Islands (Mediterranean, Spain) and the common mainland lizard Podarcis hispanica (Stein-dachner, 1870) could potentially occur because mainland haplotypes have already been detected in the islands, the two species are closely genetically related, and the frequency of visitors to these islands is increasing. However, reproductive decisions of lizards are often mediated by species recognition mechanisms based on chemical cues. On the basis of this observation, even if some mainland P. hispanica lizards were introduced to the islands, interspecific recognition might make rare an eventual hybridization with the insular P. atrata. We examined interspecific chemical recognition between the insular P. atrata and the mainland P. hispanica. Our results showed that lizards of both sexes responded more strongly (i.e., directed a significantly higher number of tongue flicks) to scents of conspecific individuals than to scents of hetero-specifics. Chemical recognition of conspecifics by endemic island P. atrata lizards may reduce the occurrence of hybridization with introduced mainland P. hispanica lizards and protect the insular gene pool.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 80
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Differences in Diel Timing of Flight May Reduce Hybridization Between Native and Introduced Geometrid Moth Congeners
    Chandler, Jennifer L.
    Elkinton, Joseph S.
    Boettner, George H.
    Andersen, Jeremy C.
    JOURNAL OF INSECT BEHAVIOR, 2025, 38 (01)
  • [2] Hybridization between native and introduced wildlife species: importance for conservation
    Simberloff, Daniel
    WILDLIFE BIOLOGY, 1996, 2 (03) : 143 - 150
  • [3] Hybridization between native and introduced species of deer in Eastern Europe
    Biedrzycka, Aleksandra
    Solarz, Wojciech
    Okarma, Henryk
    JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 2012, 93 (05) : 1331 - 1341
  • [4] Evidence for asymmetrical intraguild predation between native and introduced Anolis lizards
    G. P. Gerber
    A. C. Echternacht
    Oecologia, 2000, 124 : 599 - 607
  • [5] Hybridization between Native Bartram's Bass and Two Introduced Species in Savannah Drainage Streams
    Leitner, Jean K.
    Oswald, Kenneth J.
    Bangs, Max
    Rankin, Dan
    Quattro, Joseph M.
    BLACK BASS DIVERSITY: MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCE FOR CONSERVATION, 2015, 82 : 481 - 490
  • [6] Evidence for asymmetrical intraguild predation between native and introduced Anolis lizards
    Gerber, GP
    Echternacht, AC
    OECOLOGIA, 2000, 124 (04) : 599 - 607
  • [7] Quantifying Differences Between Native and Introduced Species
    Lemoine, Nathan P.
    Burkepile, Deron E.
    Parker, John D.
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2016, 31 (05) : 372 - 381
  • [8] Hybridization between two bitterling fish species in their sympatric range and a river where one species is native and the other is introduced
    Uemura, Yohsuke
    Yoshimi, Shotaro
    Hata, Hiroki
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (09):
  • [9] NATURAL HYBRIDIZATION BETWEEN 2 SPECIES OF COLLARED LIZARDS (CROTAPHYTUS)
    MONTANUCCI, RR
    COPEIA, 1983, (01) : 1 - 11
  • [10] Gene flow between introduced and native Eucalyptus species
    Robert C. Barbour
    Brad M. Potts
    René E. Vaillancourt
    Wayne N. Tibbits
    Robert J.E. Wiltshire
    New Forests, 2002, 23 : 177 - 191