Open quantum systems are harder to track than open classical systems

被引:3
|
作者
Warszawski, Prahlad [1 ]
Wiseman, Howard M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Phys, Ctr Excellence Engineered Quantum Syst, Australian Res Council, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Griffith Univ, Ctr Quantum Dynam, Ctr Quantum Computat & Commun Technol, Australian Res Council, Brisbane, Qld 4111, Australia
来源
QUANTUM | 2019年 / 3卷
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
STOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS; PROBABILITY RELATIONS; HOMOTOPY; ALGORITHM; JUMP;
D O I
10.22331/q-2019-10-07-192
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
For a Markovian (in the strongest sense) open quantum system it is possible, by continuously monitoring the environment, to perfectly track the system; that is, to know the stochastically evolving pure state of the system without altering the master equation. In general, even for a system with a finite Hilbert space dimension D, the pure state trajectory will explore an infinite number of points in Hilbert space, meaning that the dimension K of the classical memory required for the tracking is infinite. However, Karasik and Wiseman [Phys. Rev. Lett., 106(2):020406, 2011] showed that tracking of a qubit (D = 2) is always possible with a bit (K = 2), and gave a heuristic argument implying that a finite K should be sufficient for any D, although beyond D = 2 it would be necessary to have K > D. Our paper is concerned with rigorously investigating the relationship between D and K-min, the smallest feasible K. We confirm the long-standing conjecture of Karasik and Wiseman that, for generic systems with D > 2, K-min > D, by a computational proof (via Hilbert Nullstellensatz certificates of infeasibility). That is, beyond D = 2, D-dimensional open quantum systems are provably harder to track than D-dimensional open classical systems. We stress that this result allows complete freedom in choice of monitoring scheme, including adaptive monitoring which is, in general, necessary to implement a physically realizable ensemble (as it is known) of just K pure states. Moreover, we develop, and better justify, a new heuristic to guide our expectation of K-min as a function of D, taking into account the number L of Lindblad operators as well as symmetries in the problem. The use of invariant subspace and Wigner symmetries (that we recently introduced elsewhere, [New J. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab14b2]) makes it tractable to conduct a numerical search, using the method of polynomial homotopy continuation, to find finite physically realizable ensembles in D = 3. The results of this search support our heuristic. We thus have confidence in the most interesting feature of our heuristic: in the absence of symmetries, K-min similar to D-2, implying a quadratic gap between the classical and quantum tracking problems. Explicit adaptive monitoring schemes that realize the discovered finite ensembles are obtained numerically, thus facilitating future experimental investigations.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Open quantum systems and classical trajectories
    Rebolledo, R
    STOCHASTIC ANALYSIS AND MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS (SAMP/ANESTOC 2002), 2004, : 141 - 164
  • [2] Quantum dynamics in open quantum-classical systems
    Kapral, Raymond
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-CONDENSED MATTER, 2015, 27 (07)
  • [3] Theory of classical metastability in open quantum systems
    Macieszczak, Katarzyna
    Rose, Dominic C.
    Lesanovsky, Igor
    Garrahan, Juan P.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH, 2021, 3 (03):
  • [4] Action for classical, quantum, closed and open systems
    Polonyi, Janos
    ANNALS OF PHYSICS, 2024, 467
  • [5] Classical Properties of Infinite Quantum Open Systems
    P. Ługiewicz
    R. Olkiewicz
    Communications in Mathematical Physics, 2003, 239 : 241 - 259
  • [6] From classical to quantum theory of open systems
    Klimontovich, YL
    PHYSICA SCRIPTA, 2000, 61 (01) : 17 - 31
  • [7] Classical properties of infinite quantum open systems
    Lugiewicz, P
    Olkiewicz, R
    COMMUNICATIONS IN MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 239 (1-2) : 241 - 259
  • [8] Effectively classical quantum states for open systems
    Blanchard, P
    Olkiewicz, R
    PHYSICS LETTERS A, 2000, 273 (04) : 223 - 231
  • [9] Open classical systems
    Rey-Bellet, Luc
    OPEN QUANTUM SYSTEMS II: THE MARKOVIAN APPROACH, 2006, 1881 : 41 - 78
  • [10] Bridge from classical to quantum theory of open systems
    Klimontovich, YL
    NONLINEAR DYNAMICS IN THE LIFE AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2001, 320 : 72 - 97