A theoretical framework for sensor placement, structural identification and damage detection in tensegrity structures

被引:11
|
作者
Aloui, Omar [1 ]
Lin, Jan [1 ]
Rhode-Barbarigos, Landolf [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Coll Engn, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, 1251 Mem Dr,McArthur Engn Bldg, Coral Gables, FL 33146 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
tensegrity; sensor configuration; self-stress identification; structural identification; damage identification; cellular decomposition;
D O I
10.1088/1361-665X/ab3d21
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
Tensegrity structures are systems composed of elements in compression and tension in a stable self-equilibrium state that provides stability and stiffness to the structure. Tensegrity finds its root in contemporary art with Kenneth Snelson?s sculptures, yet it quickly evolved into a structural paradigm employed in a wide spectrum of science and engineering applications. Tensegrity structures being lightweight, and capable of combining sensors and actuators with structural elements, they are advantageous for active applications. However, in most active applications, sensor placement is based on engineering judgement and not a systematic approach based on the analysis of tensegrity structures. This paper addresses sensor placement for structural identification and damage detection in tensegrity structures using cellular decomposition. By decomposing tensegrity structures into the minimum number of constitutive unicellular sub-structures (cells and stable sub-structures resulting from their interaction), the minimum number of sensors required for their self-stress identification can be defined along with a set of edge solutions for sensor placement. Moreover, under the assumptions of a known deformed geometry and loading, it is shown that the resulting sensor configurations can be extended for structural identification as well as damage detection providing a theoretical framework for active and sensory tensegrity structures based on their cellular composition.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimum sensor placement for structural damage detection
    Shi, ZY
    Law, SS
    Zhang, LM
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2000, 126 (11) : 1173 - 1179
  • [2] Optimal sensor placement algorithm for structural damage identification
    Li C.H.
    Yang Q.W.
    Recent Patents on Engineering, 2020, 14 (01) : 69 - 81
  • [3] OPTIMAL SENSOR PLACEMENT FOR DAMAGE DETECTION IN COMPLEX STRUCTURES
    Soni, Sunilkumar
    Das, Santanu
    Chattopadhyay, Aditi
    SMASIS2009, VOL 2, 2009, : 565 - 571
  • [4] Sensor placement for structural damage detection with modal data
    Sun, Xiao-Meng
    Feng, Xin
    Zhou, Jing
    Yan, Zi-Cai
    Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology (New Series), 2010, 17 (03) : 297 - 302
  • [5] Sensor placement for structural damage detection with modal data
    孙小猛
    冯新
    周晶
    闫子才
    Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(New series), 2010, (03) : 297 - 302
  • [6] Sensor placement and structural damage identification from minimal sensor information
    Cobb, RG
    Liebst, BS
    AIAA JOURNAL, 1997, 35 (02) : 369 - 374
  • [7] Sensor placement for structural damage identification by means of topology optimization
    Blachowski, Bartlomiej
    Ostrowski, Mariusz
    Tauzowski, Piotr
    Swiercz, Andrzej
    Jankowski, Lukasz
    4TH POLISH CONGRESS OF MECHANICS AND THE 23RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER METHODS IN MECHANICS, 2020, 2239
  • [8] Optimal sensor placement for structural, damage and impact identification: A review
    Department of Architecture, University of Ferrara, Italy
    不详
    Mallardo, V., 1600, Tech Science Press (09):
  • [9] A minimax sensor placement approach for damage detection in composite structures
    Vanli, O. Arda
    Zhang, Chuck
    Annam Nguyen
    Wang, Ben
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MATERIAL SYSTEMS AND STRUCTURES, 2012, 23 (08) : 919 - 932
  • [10] Sensor Placement for Structural Damage Detection Considering Measurement Uncertainties
    Zhou, Xiao-Qing
    Xia, Yong
    Hao, Hong
    ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 16 (05) : 899 - 907