Results of surgery for spinal stenosis adjacent to previous lumbar fusion

被引:60
|
作者
Phillips, FM [1 ]
Carlson, GD [1 ]
Bohlman, HH [1 ]
Hughes, SS [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Spine Ctr, Chicago, IL 60640 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS | 2000年 / 13卷 / 05期
关键词
lumbar fusion; adjacent segment; stenosis;
D O I
10.1097/00002517-200010000-00011
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The literature provides little data to guide surgical management of spinal stenosis adjacent to previous lumbar fusion. Thirty-three consecutive patients who had surgical decompression for spinal stenosis at the lumbar segments adjacent to a previous lumbar fusion were studied. The mean interval between fusion and the adjacent segment surgery was 94 months. Of the 33 patients, 26 were followed for 3-14 years (mean: 5 years) after adjacent segment surgery and were clinically evaluated and independently completed an outcome questionnaire. Of the 26 patients, 15 rated their outcome as completely satisfactory, 6 were neutral toward the surgery, and 5 considered their surgery a failure. The surgery was generally effective at improving or relieving lower extremity neurogenic claudication. The strongest independent predictive factor of patient dissatisfaction was ongoing postoperative low back pain (r = 0.7, p = 0.001). A higher back pain score at follow-up was associated with continued narcotic use (p = 0.001) and decreased ability to perform activities of daily living (p = 0.05). Six patients required further lumbar surgery during the follow-up period. This study provides the longest published follow-up data of surgical results for symptomatic spinal stenosis adjacent to a previously asymptomatic Lumbar fusion.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 437
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    El Tecle, Najib E.
    Dahdaleh, Nader S.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 375 (06): : 597 - 597
  • [2] FUSION FOR LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS? Surgery is not always best for lumbar spinal stenosis
    Coakley, Gerald
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 354
  • [3] FUSION FOR LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS? Better research is needed on surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis
    Dean, Benjamin J. F.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 354
  • [4] FUSION FOR LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS? Surgery is not always best for lumbar spinal stenosis Reply
    Cole, Ashley A.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 354
  • [5] More on Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Forsth, Peter
    Michaelsson, Karl
    Sanden, Bengt
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 375 (18): : 1806 - 1807
  • [6] Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis REPLY
    Forsth, Peter
    Michaelsson, Karl
    Sanden, Bengt
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 375 (06): : 599 - 600
  • [7] SURGICAL RESULTS OF LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS - A COMPARISON OF PATIENTS WITH OR WITHOUT PREVIOUS BACK SURGERY
    HERNO, A
    AIRAKSINEN, O
    SAARI, T
    SIHVONEN, T
    SPINE, 1995, 20 (08) : 964 - 969
  • [8] More on Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Reply
    Ghogawala, Zoher
    Barker, Fred G., II
    Benzel, Edward C.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 375 (18): : 1807 - 1807
  • [9] Fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis?
    Cole, Ashley A.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 353
  • [10] Decompression, fusion, and instrumentation surgery for complex lumbar spinal stenosis
    Hansraj, KK
    O'Leary, PF
    Cammisa, FP
    Hall, JC
    Fras, CI
    Cohen, MS
    Dorey, FJ
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2001, (384) : 18 - 25