Immediate Maxillary Full-Arch Rehabilitation of Periodontal Patients with Terminal Dentition Using Tilted Implants and Bone Augmentation: A 5-Year Retrospective Cohort Study

被引:6
|
作者
Slutzkey, Gil S. [1 ]
Cohen, Omer [1 ]
Chaushu, Liat [1 ]
Rahmanov, Arkadi [2 ]
Mijiritsky, Eitan [2 ,3 ]
Beitlitum, Ilan [1 ]
Kolerman, Roni [1 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Maurice & Gabriela Goldschleger Sch Dent Med, Dept Periodontol & Oral Implantol, IL-6997801 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Maurice & Gabriela Goldschleger Sch Dent Med, Dept Oral Rehabil, IL-6997801 Tel Aviv, Israel
[3] Tel Aviv Univ, Tel Aviv Sourasky Med Ctr, Sackler Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg & Maxillofacial, IL-6997801 Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
immediate implants; tilted implants; periodontitis; marginal bone loss; ABUTMENT ANGULATION; PLACEMENT; EXTRACTION; STRAIGHT; PROTOCOL;
D O I
10.3390/jcm11102902
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: All-on-four protocols with tilted implants in the maxilla are used to rehabilitate the terminal dentition of the severe generalized periodontitis patients. Data on long-term biological complications are scarce. Methods: Eighty-four axial and forty-six tilted immediate implants have been placed in the extraction sockets of 23 patients according to a four-six implants protocol combined with ridge augmentation. Within 72 h, a provisional prosthesis was cemented to the implants; after 6 months, a cemented ceramic-metallic prosthesis was delivered. The patients were followed for up to 5 years. Results: The 5-year survival rate of the straight and tilted implants was 100% and 97.8, and the prosthetic one was 100%. Marginal bone loss (MBL) of the straight implants was 0.42 +/- 0.67 and 0.59 +/- 1.01 mm on the mesial and distal sides; for the tilted, it was 0.37 +/- 0.68 and 0.34 +/- 0.62 mm, and the differences were not statistically significant. Implant position, smoking, keratinized mucosal width, and cantilever did not affect MBL. Peri-implant mucositis involved 29.4% and 22.2% of the straight and tilted implants, respectively; peri-implantitis involved 5.8% and 4.4% of the straight and tilted implants, respectively, without statistical significance. Conclusions: This immediate loading protocol's 5-year survival and success rates were high. No difference between the straight and tilted implants was found regarding survival, success rates, and MBL.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Immediate Loading of Tilted and Axial Posterior Implants in the Edentulous Maxillary Arch: A Retrospective Comparison of 5-Year Outcomes
    Toljanic, Joseph A.
    Ekstrand, Karl
    Baer, Russell A.
    Thor, Andreas
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2018, 33 (02) : 433 - 438
  • [2] Maxillary bone augmentation with calvarial bone graft for immediate full-arch rehabilitation: Insights from a 10-year proof-of-concept retrospective analysis
    Diez-Fraile, Araceli
    Barbier, Lieven
    Abeloos, Johan
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2024, 35 (02) : 201 - 219
  • [3] Double Full-Arch Versus Single Full-Arch, Four Implant-Supported Rehabilitations: A Retrospective, 5-Year Cohort Study
    Malo, Paulo
    Nobre, Miguel De Araujo
    Lopes, Armando
    Rodrigues, Rolando
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2015, 24 (04): : 263 - 270
  • [4] Immediate postextraction implant placement with immediate loading for maxillary full-arch rehabilitation A two-year retrospective analysis
    Mozzati, Marco
    Arata, Valentina
    Gallesio, Giorgia
    Mussano, Federico
    Carossa, Stefano
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 143 (02): : 124 - 133
  • [5] Four-year post-loading results of full-arch rehabilitation with immediate placement and immediate loading implants: A retrospective controlled study
    Simonpieri, Alain
    Gasparro, Roberta
    Pantaleo, Giuseppe
    Mignogna, Jolanda
    Riccitiello, Francesco
    Sammartino, Gilberto
    [J]. QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 48 (04): : 315 - 324
  • [6] Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Mandible with an Immediately Loaded Full-Arch Fixed Prosthesis Supported by Three Implants: A 5-Year Retrospective Analysis
    Mezzari, Leonardo Marcos
    Primo, Bruno Tochetto
    Bavaresco, Caren Serra
    Caminha, Raquel
    Rivaldo, Elken Gomes
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2019, 34 (03) : 719 - 725
  • [7] Graftless Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation with Interantral Implants and Immediate or Delayed Loading-Part II: Transition from the Failing Maxillary Dentition
    Busenlechner, Dieter
    Mailath-Pokorny, Georg
    Haas, Robert
    Fuerhauser, Rudolf
    Eder, Carina
    Pommer, Bernhard
    Watzek, Georg
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2016, 31 (05) : 1150 - 1155
  • [8] Immediate loading of implants placed in patients with untreated periodontal disease: A 5-year prospective cohort study
    Malo, Paulo
    Nobre, Miguel de Araujo
    Lopes, Armando
    Ferro, Ana
    Gravito, Ines
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2014, 7 (03) : 295 - 304
  • [9] Retreatment of multiple failing maxillary implants after full arch rehabilitation: a retrospective, observational cohort study
    Onclin, P.
    Meijer, H. J. A.
    van Minnen, B.
    Vissink, A.
    Raghoebar, G. M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 49 (11) : 1481 - 1488
  • [10] Partial Rehabilitation with Distally Tilted and Straight Implants in the Posterior Maxilla with Immediate Loading Protocol: A Retrospective Cohort Study with 5-Year Follow-up
    Queridinha, Bruno M. T.
    Almeida, Ricardo F.
    Felino, Antonio
    Nobre, Miguel de Araujo
    Malo, Paulo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2016, 31 (04) : 891 - 899