A Comparison Between Computer-Assisted Self-Triage by Patients and Triage Performed by Nurses in the Emergency Department

被引:6
|
作者
Trivedi, Sachin [1 ]
Littmann, Jessica [2 ]
Stempien, James [3 ]
Kapur, Puneet [4 ]
Bryce, Rhonda [5 ]
Betz, Martin [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Royal Univ Hosp, Emergency Med, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[2] Univ Manitoba, Orthoped, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[3] Univ Saskatchewan, Emergency Med, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[4] Univ Saskatchewan, Jim Pattison Childrens Hosp, Emergency Med, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[5] Univ Saskatchewan, Clin Res Support Unit, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[6] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Emergency Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
emergency medicine; triage; over-crowding; hospital administration; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; PREDICTOR; MORTALITY; CHILDREN; HEALTH; TRENDS;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.14002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and objective Emergency departments (EDs) often find the number of arriving patients exceeding their capacity and find it difficult to triage them in a timely manner. The potential risk to the safety of patients awaiting assessment by a triage professional has led some hospitals to consider implementing patient self-triage, such as using kiosks. Published studies about patient self-triage are scarce and information about patients' ability to accurately assess the acuity of their condition or predict their need to be hospitalized is limited. In this study, we aimed to compare computer-assisted patient self-triage scores versus the scores assigned by the dedicated ED triage nurse (TN). Methods This pilot study enrolled patients presenting to a tertiary care hospital ED without ambulance transport. They were asked a short series of simple questions based on an algorithm, which then generated a triage score. Patients were asked whether they were likely to he admitted to the hospital. Patients then entered the usual ED system of triage. The algorithm-generated triage score was then compared with the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) score assigned by the TN. Whether the patients actually required hospital admission was determined by checking their medical records. Results Among the 492 patients enrolled, agreement of triage scores was observed in 27%. Acuity was overestimated by 65% of patients. Underestimation of acuity occurred in 8%. Among patients predicting hospitalization, 17% were admitted, but the odds ratio (OR) for admission was 3.4. Half of the patients with cardiorespiratory complaints were correct in predicting the need for hospitalization. Conclusion The use of a short questionnaire by patients to self-triage showed limited accuracy, but sensitivity was high for some serious medical conditions. The prediction of hospitalization was more accurate with regard to cardiorespiratory complaints.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of self-triage tools to nurse driven triage in the emergency department
    Trivedi, Sachin V.
    Batta, Rachit
    Henao-Romero, Nicolas
    Mondal, Prosanta
    Wilson, Tracy
    Stempien, James
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (08):
  • [2] Criterion validity of a computer-assisted instrument of self-triage (ca-ISET) compared to the validity of regular triage in an ophthalmic emergency department
    Eijk, Eva S. V.
    Bettink-Remeijer, Marijke Wefers
    Timman, Reinier
    Heres, Marion H. B.
    Busschbach, Jan J. V.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2016, 85 (01) : 61 - 67
  • [3] Towards patient self-triage in the ophthalmic emergency department: sensitivity and specificity of a self-triage instrument
    Eijk, Eva S. V.
    Busschbach, Jan J. V.
    Monteban, Helma
    Timman, Reinier
    Bettink-Remeijer, Marijke Wefers
    [J]. ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2014, 92 (07) : 697 - 700
  • [4] From pen-and-paper questionnaire to a computer-assisted instrument for self-triage in the ophthalmic emergency department: Process and validation
    Eijk, Eva S. V.
    Bettink-Remeijer, Marijke Wefers
    Timman, Reinier
    Busschbach, Jan J. V.
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2015, 66 : 258 - 262
  • [5] The factors that influence the interactions between mental health triage nurses and emergency department triage nurses
    Broadbent, M.
    Moxham, L.
    Dwyer, T.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2009, 18 : A2 - A2
  • [6] Nurses in the triage of the emergency department: self-compassion and empathy
    Savieto, Roberta Maria
    Mercer, Stewart
    Pereira Matos, Carolina Carvalho
    Leao, Eliseth Ribeiro
    [J]. REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2019, 27
  • [7] EVALUATION OF EMERGENCY ROOM TRIAGE PERFORMED BY NURSES
    ALBIN, SL
    WASSERTHEILSMOLLER, S
    JACOBSON, S
    BELL, B
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1975, 65 (10) : 1063 - 1068
  • [8] The Use of a Kiosk-Model Bilingual Self-Triage System in the Pediatric Emergency Department
    Sinha, Madhumita
    Khor, Kai-Ning
    Amresh, Ashish
    Drachman, David
    Frechette, Alan
    [J]. PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2014, 30 (01) : 63 - 68
  • [9] EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT TRIAGE: DO EXPERIENCED NURSES AGREE ON TRIAGE SCORES?
    Dallaire, Clemence
    Poitras, Julien
    Aubin, Karine
    Lavoie, Andre
    Moore, Lynne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2012, 42 (06): : 736 - 740
  • [10] Can emergency department triage nurses predict patients' dispositions?
    Kosowsky, JM
    Shindel, S
    Liu, TP
    Hamilton, C
    Pancioli, AM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 19 (01): : 10 - 14