Interactions among forestry regeneration treatments, plant vigour and browsing damage by deer.

被引:14
|
作者
Bergquist, J [1 ]
Örlander, G
Nilsson, U
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Anim Ecol, Asa Forest Res Stn, S-36030 Lammhult, Sweden
[2] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, So Swedish Forest Res Ctr, S-23053 Alnarp, Sweden
关键词
browsing damage; Capreolus capreolus; forest regeneration; Picea abies; plant vigour; roe deer; seedling; spruce;
D O I
10.1023/A:1022378908827
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
In a large field experiment we studied the influence of regeneration methods on the extent to which roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) browse on spruce (Picea abies L. Karst) seedlings. Our objective was to evaluate if treatments that are good at stimulating regeneration may increase browsing damage by deer. Data were collected between 1993 and 1995, and in the winters of 1993-94 and 1994-95 the frequency of browsed seedlings was 13.2% and 13.4%, respectively. The frequency of browsing damage varied considerably between sites and clearcuts. Browsing damage was more frequent when the regeneration methods included insecticide treatments. Among insecticide-free treatments, browsing was heavier on scarified plots than on herbicide-treated or control plots (in which seedlings were planted on untreated ground and given no post-planting treatment). Containerised seedlings were browsed more than bare-rooted ones. Neither the age of clearcut when planting, nor removal of slash, had any effect on browsing. It was demonstrated that regeneration methods that increased plant vigour (as assessed by leader growth and needle colour index) led to more browsing damage. Thus, our results support the plant vigour hypothesis, which states that many herbivores prefer to feed on vigorous plants because they are more nutritious. However, the difference in browsing damage between containerised and bare-rooted seedlings could not be explained solely by the plant vigour hypothesis.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 40
页数:16
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Interactions among forestry regeneration treatments, plant vigour and browsing damage by deer.
    Jonas Bergquist
    Göran Örlander
    Urban Nilsson
    New Forests, 2003, 25 : 25 - 40
  • [2] Modelling the cost of roe deer browsing damage to forestry
    Ward, AI
    White, PCL
    Smith, A
    Critchley, CH
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 191 (1-3) : 301 - 310
  • [3] Interaction among deer browsing, hunting, and tree regeneration
    Martin, JL
    Baltzinger, C
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 2002, 32 (07): : 1254 - 1264
  • [4] Interaction among deer browsing, hunting, and tree regeneration
    Martin, Jean-Louis
    Baltzinger, Christophe
    Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2002, 32 (07) : 1254 - 1264
  • [5] The effect of plant competition and simulated summer browsing by deer on tree regeneration
    Harmer, R
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2001, 38 (05) : 1094 - 1103
  • [6] Variability in deer diet and plant vulnerability to browsing among forests with different establishment years of sika deer
    Sakata, Yuzu
    Shirahama, Nami
    Uechi, Ayaka
    Okano, Kunihiro
    PEERJ, 2021, 9
  • [7] Browsing damage by roe deer on Norway spruce seedlings planted on clearcuts of different ages: 2. Effect of seedling vigour
    Bergquist, J
    Orlander, G
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 1998, 105 (1-3) : 295 - 302
  • [8] Deer browsing reduces leaf damage by herbivorous insects through an induced response of the host plant
    Shimazaki, A
    Miyashita, T
    ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2002, 17 (05) : 527 - 533
  • [9] Belowground mechanisms for oak regeneration: Interactions among fire, soil microbes, and plant community alter oak seedling growth
    Beals, Kendall K.
    Scearce, Alex E.
    Swystun, Alex T.
    Schweitzer, Jennifer A.
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 503
  • [10] Factors affecting in vitro regeneration in the model tree Populus trichocarpa: II. Heritability estimates, correlations among explant types, and genetic interactions with treatments among wild genotypes
    Ma, Cathleen
    Duan, Chenyang
    Jiang, Yuan
    Nagle, Michael
    Peremyslova, Ekaterina
    Goddard, Amanda
    Strauss, Steven H.
    IN VITRO CELLULAR & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY-PLANT, 2022, 58 (06) : 853 - 864