Tracing the origin of adenocarcinomas with unknown primary using immunohistochemistry: Differential diagnosis between colonic and ovarian carcinomas as primary sites

被引:129
|
作者
Lagendijk, JH [1 ]
Mullink, H [1 ]
Van Diest, PJ [1 ]
Meijer, GA [1 ]
Meijer, CJLM [1 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Amsterdam Hosp, Inst Pathol, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
ACUP; ovarian carcinoma; colonic carcinoma; immunohistochemistry; discriminant analysis; decision tree;
D O I
10.1016/S0046-8177(98)90065-X
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
To discriminate adenocarcinoma metastases originating from either colon or ovary, a panel of immunohistochemical markers was evaluated. For this purpose, paraffin sections from 157 primary and metastatic colonic and ovarian carcinomas were immunostained. These cases were divided into a learning group of 46 colonic and 54 ovarian carcinomas and a test group of 29 colonic and 28 ovarian carcinomas, including all metastatic tumors, among which were five with unknown primary site at the time of testing. The sections were immunostained with antibodies against carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin 7 (CK7), cytokeratin 20 (CK20), CA 125, vimentin, and CA 19.9. Staining results were expressed as the product of staining intensity and percentage of positive tumor tells. Stepwise discriminant analysis was applied on the learning set to obtain a classification function for both tumors. The validity of the classification function was evaluated using the test set. There was considerable overlap in immunostaining for both tumor types, but colonic carcinomas were typically positive for CEA and CK20 and negative for CK7 and CA125. Ovarian carcinomas were typically positive for CK7 and CA125 and negative for CEA and CK20. Tn discriminant analysis, the best combination of markers appeared to be CK7 and CEA. Only one sample of the test group (2%) was misclassified. Taking learning and test groups together, 136 of the 157 samples (87%) were correctly classified with high posterior probability (PP > .8). However, from the 28 mucinous ovarian carcinomas, only 19 (68%) could correctly be classified with high PP. When excluding the nonmucinous ovarian carcinomas from the analysis, overall 87 of 103 (84.5%) of the samples were correctly classified (PP > .8) with a combination of CEA, CK7, and also vimentin. From the 28 mucinous ovarian carcinomas, only two (7%) were misclassified, and four could not be classified with sufficient certainty. In neither analysis did CK20, CA125, or CA19.9 emerge as discriminatory parameters. Based on the same data, an intuitive flow chart was constructed with which 129 of 157 cases could be classified (only one falsely) without further statistical analysis. The five metastases with an at first unknown primary could, according to the followup, all be classified correctly with high PP. Most ovarian carcinomas, including the mucinous ones, can be discriminated with high probability from colonic carcinomas using a panel of three antibodies directed against CEA, cytokeratin 7, and vimentin. Copyright (C) 1998 by W.B. Saunders Company.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 497
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Immunohistochemistry for Diagnosis of Metastatic Carcinomas of Unknown Primary Site
    Selves, Janick
    Long-Mira, Elodie
    Mathieu, Marie-Christine
    Rochaix, Philippe
    Ilie, Marius
    [J]. CANCERS, 2018, 10 (04)
  • [2] Carcinomas of an unknown primary origin—diagnosis and treatment
    Christophe Massard
    Yohann Loriot
    Karim Fizazi
    [J]. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2011, 8 : 701 - 710
  • [3] The value of immunohistochemistry in patients with poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas and undifferentiated carcinomas of unknown primary
    vanderGaast, A
    Verweij, J
    Planting, AST
    Stoter, G
    HenzenLogmans, SC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 122 (03) : 181 - 185
  • [4] Carcinomas of an unknown primary origin-diagnosis and treatment
    Massard, Christophe
    Loriot, Yohann
    Fizazi, Karim
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 8 (12) : 701 - 710
  • [5] Differential diagnosis of primary and metastatic ovarian carcinomas
    Zakhartseva, L. M.
    Manzhura, O. P.
    Vashchenko, Yu.
    V. Maistrenko, Ye.
    Kravchuk, O. M.
    Shatrova, K. M.
    Rudnytska, O. H.
    [J]. PATHOLOGIA, 2023, 20 (03): : 281 - 288
  • [6] Cost-effectiveness in diagnosis and treatment of carcinomas of unknown primary origin
    Desboeuf, K
    Molinier, L
    Carrère, MO
    Bugat, R
    Boisseau, M
    Machelard-Sauvage, M
    Voigt, JJ
    Pous, J
    [J]. BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2001, 88 (11) : 1119 - 1127
  • [7] Immunohistochemical differentiation between primary adenocarcinomas of the ovary and ovarian metastases of colonic and breast origin. Comparison between a statistical and an intuitive approach
    Lagendijk, JH
    Mullink, H
    van Diest, PJ
    Meijer, GA
    Meijer, CJLM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1999, 52 (04) : 283 - 290
  • [8] USE OF STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANTIGEN PROFILES IN DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS BETWEEN COLONIC AND OVARIAN ADENOCARCINOMAS
    HENZENLOGMANS, SC
    SCHIPPER, NW
    POELS, LG
    STOLK, K
    KENEMANS, P
    MEYER, CJLM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1988, 41 (06) : 644 - 649
  • [9] Utility of immunohistochemical Pax8 expression in the differential diagnosis between primary ovarian carcinomas and metastases to the ovary
    Elversang, J.
    Lidang, M.
    Skovlund, Ravn B.
    [J]. APMIS, 2011, 119 : 46 - 46
  • [10] Immunohistochemistry in the differential diagnosis between primary and secondary intestinal adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder
    Raspollini, MR
    Nesi, G
    Baroni, G
    Girardi, LR
    Taddei, GL
    [J]. APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2005, 13 (04) : 358 - 362