Self-monitoring for speech errors: Two-stage detection and repair with and without auditory feedback

被引:18
|
作者
Nooteboom, Sieb G. [1 ]
Queue, Hugo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Utrecht Inst Linguist OTS, Trans 10, NL-3512 JK Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Speech errors; Self-monitoring; Repairs; Audition; Somatosensory; LEXICAL BIAS; LANGUAGE PRODUCTION; COMPREHENSION; SPEAKERS; TONGUE; MECHANISMS; ACCOUNT; CONTEXT; SLIPS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.007
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Two experiments are reported, eliciting segmental speech errors and self-repairs. Error frequencies, detection frequencies, error-to-cutoff times and cutoff-to-repair times were assessed with and without auditory feedback, for errors against four types of segmental oppositions. Main hypotheses are (a) prearticulatory and postarticulatory detection of errors is reflected in a bimodal distribution of error-to-cutoff times; (b) after postarticulatory error detection repairs need to be planned in a time-consuming way, but not after prearticulatory detection; (c) postarticulatory error detection depends on auditory feedback. Results confirm hypotheses (a) and (b) but not (c). Internal and external detection are temporally separated by some 500 ms on average, fast and slow repairs by some 700 ms. Error detection does not depend on audition. This seems self-evident for prearticulatory but not for postarticulatory error detection. Theoretical implications of these findings are discussed. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 35
页数:17
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Speech self-monitoring in preschoolers: The effects of delayed auditory feedback on recitation
    Harper, LV
    Huie, KS
    [J]. PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 2000, 90 (03) : 1157 - 1170
  • [2] Temporal aspects of self-monitoring for speech errors
    Nooteboom, Sieb
    Quene, Hugo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2019, 105 : 43 - 59
  • [3] Brain activations during conscious self-monitoring of speech production with delayed auditory feedback: An fMRI study
    Hashimoto, Y
    Sakai, KL
    [J]. HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2003, 20 (01) : 22 - 28
  • [4] Self-monitoring and feedback:: A new attempt to find the main cause of lexical bias in phonological speech errors
    Nooteboom, Sieb
    Quene, Hugo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 58 (03) : 837 - 861
  • [5] Thought as action: Inner speech, self-monitoring, and auditory verbal hallucinations
    Jones, Simon R.
    Fernyhough, Charles
    [J]. CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2007, 16 (02) : 391 - 399
  • [6] Self-monitoring for speech errors in novel phrases and phrasal lexical items
    Nooteboom, Sieb
    [J]. YEARBOOK OF PHRASEOLOGY, 2011, : 1 - 16
  • [7] Parallels between self-monitoring for speech errors and identification of the misspoken segments
    Nooteboom, Sieb G.
    Queue, Hugo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2013, 69 (03) : 417 - 428
  • [8] Self-monitoring in the cerebral cortex: Neural responses to small pitch shifts in auditory feedback during speech production
    Franken, Matthias K.
    Eisner, Frank
    Acheson, Daniel J.
    McQueen, James M.
    Hagoort, Peter
    Schoffelen, Jan-Mathijs
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2018, 179 : 326 - 336
  • [9] Brain Structures and Cognitive Abilities Important for the Self-Monitoring of Speech Errors
    Mandal, Ayan S.
    Fama, Mackenzie E.
    Skipper-Kallal, Laura M.
    DeMarco, Andrew T.
    Lacey, Elizabeth H.
    Turkeltaub, Peter E.
    [J]. NEUROBIOLOGY OF LANGUAGE, 2020, 1 (03): : 319 - 338
  • [10] Modeling Responses to Auditory Feedback Perturbations in Adults, Children, and Children With Complex Speech Sound Disorders: Evidence for Impaired Auditory Self-Monitoring?
    Terband, Hayo
    van Brenk, Frits
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2023, 66 (05): : 1563 - 1587