Pilot of Decision Support to Individualize Colorectal Cancer Screening Recommendations

被引:0
|
作者
Schwartz, Amy R. [1 ,2 ]
Levin, Forrest L. [2 ]
O'Neil, Joseph A., Jr. [3 ]
Braithwaite, R. Scott [4 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT USA
[2] VA Connecticut Healthcare Syst, West Haven, CT USA
[3] VISN 1, Dept Vet Affairs, Providence, RI USA
[4] NYU, Sch Med, New York, NY USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE | 2015年 / 21卷 / 07期
关键词
SERVICES TASK-FORCE; COMORBIDITY; COLONOSCOPY; POPULATION; VETERANS; POLYPS; IMPACT; CARE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To test the feasibility of using an electronic medical record (EMR)-based decision support system (DSS) that incorporates morbidity and frailty information to individualize colorectal cancer (CRC) screening recommendations. Study Design: Our framework used the payoff time, defined as the minimum time until the benefits of screening exceed the harms. Methods: Subjects were 24 patients eligible for CRC screening and 22 primary care providers (PCPs). Measures included PCP satisfaction with existing reminder systems and with decision support. Results: The run-in phase, during which the intervention was inactive but its performance was verified, had 14 patients enrolled. The intervention phase, during which payoff time and life expectancy calculations were used to recommend for or against CRC screening, had 10 patients enrolled. Of the 10 patients enrolled in the intervention phase, the DSS recommended in favor of CRC screening for 6 patients. (The PCPs also recommended it for those 6 patients, although 3 refused the screening.) The DSS recommended against CRC screening for 4 patients, while the PCPs recommended against it for 3 of those 4 and ordered the screening for 1 patient. PCPs who had patients enrolled in the intervention phase indicated interest in having payoff time information for all patients eligible for CRC screening. This pilot study was small and was not powered to determine the effect of the intervention on screening behavior. Conclusions: Colorectal cancer screening involves balancing immediate harms with longer-term benefits; EMR decision support may facilitate personalized benefit/harm assessment. The payoff time framework is feasible for implementation in EMR decision support.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / +
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Decision analysis for colorectal cancer screening recommendations
    Zauber, Ann G.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 77
  • [2] Colorectal Cancer Screening: Randomized Trials Are Essential to Support Recommendations
    Bretthauer, Michael
    Schoen, Robert E.
    Cross, Amanda J.
    Pinsky, Paul F.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2022, 175 (01) : 129 - 130
  • [3] DECISION SUPPORT AND INDIVIDUALIZED DECISION MAKING FOR COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING IN THE ELDERLY
    Lewis, Carmen L.
    DeLeon, Christopher P.
    Pignone, Michael P.
    Golin, Carol E.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 26 : S120 - S121
  • [4] Evaluating a Modular Decision Support Application For Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Militello, Laura G.
    Diiulio, Julie B.
    Borders, Morgan R.
    Sushereba, Christen E.
    Saleem, Jason J.
    Haverkamp, Donald
    Imperiale, Thomas F.
    APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS, 2017, 8 (01): : 162 - 179
  • [5] Physician colorectal cancer screening recommendations: An examination based on informed decision making
    Wackerbarth, Sarah B.
    Tarasenko, Yelena N.
    Joyce, Jennifer M.
    Haist, Steven A.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2007, 66 (01) : 43 - 50
  • [6] Designing Colorectal Cancer Screening Decision Support: A Cognitive Engineering Enterprise
    Militello, Laura G.
    Saleem, Jason J.
    Borders, Morgan R.
    Sushereba, Christen E.
    Haverkamp, Donald
    Wolf, Steven P.
    Doebbeling, Bradley N.
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING, 2016, 10 (01) : 74 - 90
  • [7] Colorectal Cancer Screening Recommendations Reply
    Bibbins-Domingo, Kirsten
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 316 (16): : 1717 - 1717
  • [8] Updates in Screening Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer
    Ness, Reid M.
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2022, 20 (5.5): : 603 - 606
  • [9] Screening for colorectal cancer: Recommendations and rationale
    Berg, AO
    Allan, JD
    Frame, P
    Homer, CJ
    Johnson, MS
    Klein, JD
    Lieu, TA
    Mulrow, CD
    Orleans, TC
    Peipert, JF
    Pender, NJ
    Siu, AL
    Teutsch, SM
    Westhoff, C
    Woolf, SH
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2002, 102 (09) : 107 - +
  • [10] Online Narratives and Peer Support for Colorectal Cancer Screening A Pilot Randomized Trial
    Hwang, Kevin O.
    Ottenbacher, Allison J.
    Graham, Amanda L.
    Thomas, Eric J.
    Street, Rick L.
    Vernon, Sally W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 45 (01) : 98 - 107