Prescribed fire influences habitat selection of female eastern wild turkeys

被引:19
|
作者
Yeldell, Nathan A. [1 ,3 ]
Cohen, Bradley S. [1 ]
Prebyl, Thomas J. [1 ]
Collier, Bret A. [2 ]
Chamberlain, Michael J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Warnell Sch Forestry & Nat Resources, 180 E Green St, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Ctr Agr, Sch Renewable Nat Resources, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[3] Louisiana Dept Wildlife & Fisheries, 42371 Phyllis Ann Dr, Hammond, LA 70403 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT | 2017年 / 81卷 / 07期
关键词
brownian bridge movement model; distance-based habitat selection; Louisiana; Meleagris gallopavo; nesting; prescribed fire; reproduction; resource selection; space use; BROWNIAN BRIDGE MOVEMENT; LONGLEAF PINE; HOME-RANGE; NEST SURVIVAL; VEGETATION; DIVERSITY; SIZE;
D O I
10.1002/jwmg.21290
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Prescribed fire is widely used in southeastern pine (Pinus spp.) forests to maintain desirable forest conditions and provide early successional vegetation. However, it is unclear how fires applied just prior to and during the reproductive cycle of ground nesting Galliformes influence resource selection. We examined the short-term influence of prescribed fire on habitat selection of female eastern wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) throughout their reproductive cycle (Feb-Aug) at Kisatchie National Forest in west-central Louisiana, USA during 2014 and 2015. Kisatchie was dominated (>60%) by pine stands managed with prescribed fire at a frequent (i.e., 1-3 yr) return interval. We captured 46 females and equipped them with backpack-style global positioning system (GPS) transmitters programmed to collect relocation data hourly from 0600 to 2000 each day. We used distance-based analysis to estimate selection or avoidance of vegetation communities relative to reproductive phenology of individual females. Hardwood and mixed-pine hardwood vegetation communities were selected for before and after reproductive efforts; hardwood stands were avoided during brooding. While laying their first clutch of the reproductive period, females selected mature pines burned 0-5 months prior. Females avoided mature pine stands 2 growing seasons post-burn prior to initiating their first nests. Females avoided mature pine stands 3 growing seasons post-burn when brooding. Turkeys did not select for pine stands that had experienced 3 growing seasons post-burn during any reproductive period, and may avoid these stands during pre-nesting and brooding. Frequent fire return intervals maintain vegetation communities that females select at some point during the reproductive season in pine-dominated landscapes. (c) 2017 The Wildlife Society. Turkeys did not select for pine stands that have experienced 3 growing seasons post-burn during any part of the reproductive period, and may actually avoid these stands during pre-nesting and brooding. In areas with similar fire regimes, our data suggests frequent (i.e., 1-3 yr) fire return intervals maintain vegetation communities that females select at some point during the reproductive season.
引用
收藏
页码:1287 / 1297
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Use of pine-dominated forests by female eastern wild turkeys immediately after prescribed fire
    Yeldell, Nathan A.
    Cohen, Bradley S.
    Prebyl, Thomas J.
    Collier, Bret A.
    Chamberlain, Michael J.
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 398 : 226 - 234
  • [2] HABITAT USE BY FEMALE EASTERN WILD TURKEYS IN SOUTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA
    BIDWELL, TG
    SHALAWAY, SD
    MAUGHAN, OE
    TALENT, LG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1989, 53 (01): : 34 - 39
  • [3] Habitat selection models for eastern wild turkeys in central Mississippi
    Miller, DA
    Leopold, BD
    Hurst, GA
    Gerard, PD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2000, 64 (03): : 765 - 776
  • [4] Habitat sampling and selection by female wild turkeys during preincubation
    Chamberlain, MJ
    Leopold, BD
    [J]. WILSON BULLETIN, 2000, 112 (03): : 326 - 331
  • [5] Habitat sampling and habitat selection by female wild turkeys: Ecological correlates and reproductive consequences
    Badyaev, AV
    Martin, TE
    Etges, WJ
    [J]. AUK, 1996, 113 (03): : 636 - 646
  • [6] BROOD HABITAT USE BY EASTERN WILD TURKEYS IN EASTERN TEXAS
    CAMPO, JJ
    SWANK, WG
    HOPKINS, CR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1989, 53 (02): : 479 - 482
  • [7] Selection of landcover types by translocated female eastern wild turkeys in east Texas
    Sullivan, Daniel J.
    Little, Andrew R.
    Poteet, Micah L.
    Collier, Bret A.
    Chamberlain, Michael J.
    [J]. WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2022, 46 (02):
  • [8] Effects of prescribed fire on prenesting movements of wild turkeys in Arkansas
    Pittman, H. Tyler
    Krementz, David G.
    [J]. WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2022, 46 (02):
  • [9] Habitat use of eastern wild turkeys in central Mississippi
    Miller, DA
    Hurst, GA
    Leopold, BD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1999, 63 (01): : 210 - 222
  • [10] Time-since-fire and stand seral stage affect habitat selection of eastern wild turkeys in a managed longleaf pine ecosystem
    Wood, Jeremy W.
    Cohen, Bradley S.
    Prebyl, Thomas J.
    Conner, L. Mike
    Collier, Bret A.
    Chamberlain, Michael J.
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 411 : 203 - 212