Mission Reliability Modeling and Importance Analysis of UAV Swarm

被引:0
|
作者
Bai G. [1 ]
Zhang C. [1 ]
Dui H. [2 ]
Zhang Y. [1 ]
Tao J. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Intelligence Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha
[2] School of Management Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou
关键词
Birnbaum importance measure; integrated importance measure; reliability; system performance; UAV swarm;
D O I
10.3901/JME.2022.10.361
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Traditional platform-centric static reliability assessment cannot meet the reliability analysis requirements of UAV swarms for diversified tasks under complex and confrontational battlefield. Due to the redundancy of UAV swarms, the research focus on its reliability has changed to mission-centric reliability, which is of great significance for mission planning, decision-making and improving mission success rate. According to the formation and task of the swarm, a mission reliability model of the UAV swarm based on the one-dimensional linear continuous k-out-of-n system and the two-dimensional linear continuous (r, s)-out-of- (m, n) system is developed. The influence on the mission reliability change and performance of the swarm was obtained when one or several UAVs fail. Next, the Birnbaum importance and Integrated importance measure of UAV swarms in one-dimensional and two-dimensional spaces are proposed respectively. The impact of changes in the reliability of UAVs in different locations on the performance of the swarm is analyzed. Then weak links and key UAV in the swarm are determined. Finally, based on the case study of UAV swarm in different formations, the impact of UAVs failure on swarm mission reliability and performance is analyzed and the correctness and effectiveness of the proposed method are verified. © 2022 Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 373
页数:12
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] PRESCOTT D, REMENYTE-PRESCOTT R,, REED S,, Et al., A reliability analysis method using binary decision diagrams in phased mission planning[J], Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers,Part O:Journal of Risk and Reliability, 223, 2, pp. 133-143, (2009)
  • [2] PRESCOTT D, ANDREWS J, DOWNES C., Multiplatform phased mission reliability modelling for mission planning[J], Journal of Risk & Reliability, 223, 1, pp. 27-39, (2009)
  • [3] PETRITOLI E,, LECCESE F, CIANI L., Reliability and maintenance analysis of unmanned aerial vehicles[J], Sensors, 18, 9, pp. 250-258, (2018)
  • [4] HU B, SEILER P., Pivotal decomposition for reliability analysis of fault tolerant control systems on unmanned aerial vehicles[J], Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 140, 6, pp. 130-141, (2015)
  • [5] LIU D, JARAMILLO M, VINCENZI D., The effects of system reliability and mission uncertainty on autonomous unmanned aerial vehicle operator performance under high time pressure[J], Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 25, 5, pp. 515-522, (2015)
  • [6] IANOVSKY E, KREIMER J., An optimal routing policy for unmanned aerial vehicles (analytical and cross-entropy simulation approach)[J], Annals of Operations Research, 189, 1, pp. 215-253, (2011)
  • [7] SECINTI G,, DARIAN P, CANBERK B, Et al., SDNs in the sky:Obust end-to-end connectivity for aerial vehicular networks[J], IEEE Communications Magazine, 56, 1, pp. 16-21, (2018)
  • [8] Hong PEI, HU Changhua, SI Xiaosheng, Et al., Review of machine learning based remaining useful life prediction methods for equipment[J], Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 55, 8, pp. 1-13, (2019)
  • [9] TANG Shengjin, GUO Xiaosong, SI Xiaosheng, Et al., Step stress accelerated degradation process modeling and remaining useful life estimation[J], Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 50, 16, pp. 33-40, (2014)
  • [10] GUO J, ELSAYED E., Reliability of balanced multi-level unmanned arial vehicles[J], Computers & Operations Research, 16, 2, pp. 1-13, (2019)