Effects of a Financial Incentive on Health Researchers' Response to an Online Survey: a Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:25
|
作者
Wilson, Paul M. [1 ]
Petticrew, Mark [2 ]
Calnan, Mike [3 ]
Nazareth, Irwin [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Ctr Reviews & Disseminat, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[2] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Publ & Environm Hlth Res Unit, London WC1, England
[3] Univ Kent, Sch Social Policy Sociol & Social Res, Canterbury, Kent, England
[4] UCL, MRC Gen Practice Res Framework, London, England
关键词
Questionnaires; Electronic Mail; Randomized Controlled Trial; Reminder Systems; reward; SURVEY PARTICIPATION; WEB SURVEYS; RATES;
D O I
10.2196/jmir.1251
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Nonresponse to questionnaires can affect the validity of surveys and introduce bias. Offering financial incentives can increase response rates to postal questionnaires, but the effect of financial incentives on response rates to online surveys is less clear. Objective: As part of a survey, we aimed to test whether knowledge of a financial incentive would increase the response rate to an online questionnaire. Methods: A randomized controlled trial of 485 UK-based principal investigators of publicly funded health services and population health research. Participants were contacted by email and invited to complete an online questionnaire via an embedded URL. Participants were randomly allocated to groups with either "knowledge of" or "no knowledge or a financial incentive (10 Amazon gift voucher) to be provided on completion of the survey. At the end of the study, gift vouchers were given to all participants who completed the questionnaire regardless of initial randomization status. Four reminder emails (sent from the same email address as the initial invitation) were sent out to nonrespondents at one, two, three, and four weeks; a fifth postal reminder was also undertaken. The primary outcome measure for the trial was the response rate one week after the second reminder. Response rate was also measured at the end of weeks one, two, three, four, and five, and after a postal reminder was sent. Results: In total, 243 (50%) questionnaires were returned (232 completed, 11 in which participation was declined). One week after the second reminder, the response rate in the "knowledge" group was 27% (66/244) versus 20% (49/241) in the "no knowledge" group (x(1)(2) = 3.0, P = .08). The odds ratio for responding among those with knowledge of an incentive was 1.45 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95 - 2.21). At the third reminder, participants in the "no knowledge" group were informed about the incentive, ending the randomized element of the study. However we continued to follow up all participants, and from reminder three onwards, no significant differences were observed in the response rates of the two groups. Conclusions: Knowledge of a financial incentive did not significantly increase the response rate to an online questionnaire. Future surveys should consider including a randomized element to further test the utility of offering incentives of other types and amounts to participate in online questionnaires.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of prepaid and promised financial incentive on follow-up survey response in cigarette smokers: a randomized controlled trial
    Yee Tak Derek Cheung
    Xue Weng
    Man Ping Wang
    Sai Yin Ho
    Antonio Cho Shing Kwong
    Vienna Wai Yin Lai
    Tai Hing Lam
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19
  • [2] Effect of prepaid and promised financial incentive on follow-up survey response in cigarette smokers: a randomized controlled trial
    Cheung, Yee Tak Derek
    Weng, Xue
    Wang, Man Ping
    Ho, Sai Yin
    Kwong, Antonio Cho Shing
    Lai, Vienna Wai Yin
    Lam, Tai Hing
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [3] Effects of an Increased Financial Incentive on Follow-up in an Online, Automated Smoking Cessation Trial: A randomized Controlled Study Within a Trial
    High, Juliet
    Grant, Kelly
    Hope, Aimie
    Shepstone, Lee
    West, Claire
    Colles, Antony
    Naughton, Felix
    [J]. NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2024, 26 (09) : 1259 - 1263
  • [4] The effect of monetary incentive on survey response for vulnerable children and youths: A randomized controlled trial
    Pejtersen, Jan Hyld
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (05):
  • [5] The effect of a monetary incentive for administrative assistants on the survey response rate: a randomized controlled trial
    Arnav Agarwal
    Dany Raad
    Victor Kairouz
    John Fudyma
    Anne B. Curtis
    Holger J. Schünemann
    Elie A. Akl
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16
  • [6] The effect of a monetary incentive for administrative assistants on the survey response rate: a randomized controlled trial
    Agarwal, Arnav
    Raad, Dany
    Kairouz, Victor
    Fudyma, John
    Curtis, Anne B.
    Schunemann, Holger J.
    Akl, Elie A.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2016, 16
  • [7] The effects of lottery incentive and length of questionnaire on health survey response rates: A randomized study
    Kalantar, JS
    Talley, NJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 52 (11) : 1117 - 1122
  • [8] Screening for diabetic retinopathy with different levels of financial incentive in a randomized controlled trial
    Lian, Jin Xiao
    McGhee, Sarah Morag
    So, Ching
    Kwong, Alfred Siu Kei
    Sum, Rita
    Tsui, Wendy Wing Sze
    Chao, David Vai Kiong
    Chan, Jonathan Cheuk Hung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIABETES INVESTIGATION, 2021, 12 (09) : 1632 - 1641
  • [9] The effect of a voucher incentive on a survey response rate in the clinical setting: a quasi-randomized controlled trial
    Pieper, Dawid
    Kotte, Nina
    Ober, Peggy
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2018, 18
  • [10] The effect of a voucher incentive on a survey response rate in the clinical setting: a quasi-randomized controlled trial
    Dawid Pieper
    Nina Kotte
    Peggy Ober
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18