Evaluating an instrument for the peer review of inpatient teaching

被引:50
|
作者
Beckman, TJ
Lee, MC
Rohren, CH
Pankratz, VS
机构
[1] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Div Gen Internal Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Div Area Gen Internal Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Div Community Internal Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[4] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Dept Hlth Sci Res, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/0142159031000092508
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to assess an instrument for the peer review of inpatient teaching at Mayo. The Mayo Teaching Evaluation Form (MTEF) is an instrument, based on the Stanford seven-category educational framework, which was developed for the peer review of inpatient teaching. The MTEF has 28 Likert-scaled items derived from the Stanford Faculty Development Program form (SFDP-26), the Mayo electronic evaluation form and three additional items. In this study three physician-evaluators used the MTEF to evaluate 10 attending physicians on the Mayo general internal medicine hospital services. Cronbach's alphas were used to assess the internal consistency of the MTEF, and Kendall's coefficient of concordance was used to summarize the inter-rater reliability. Results of this study reveal that the MTEF is internally consistent, based on average ratings across all evaluators (Cronbach's alpha = 0.894). Stanford categories with the highest alphas are Self-Directed Learning, Learning Climate, Communication of Goals, and Evaluation. Categories with lower alphas are Feedback, Understanding and Retention, and Control of Teaching Session. Additionally, the majority of items on the MTEF show significant agreement across all evaluators, and teacher enthusiasm was among the most reliable items. In conclusion, the MTEF is overall internally consistent for the peer review of inpatient teaching at Mayo. Hence, the MTEF may be a useful element in the peer evaluation of teaching at our institution.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 135
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Generalist internists' opinions on the peer review of inpatient teaching.
    Beckman, TJ
    Lee, MC
    Rohren, CH
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 18 : 236 - 236
  • [2] Evaluating the performance of inpatient attending physiciansA new instrument for today’s teaching hospitals
    Christopher A. Smith
    Anita B. Varkey
    Arthur T. Evans
    Brendan M. Reilly
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2004, 19 : 766 - 771
  • [3] Evaluating the performance of inpatient attending physicians - A new instrument for today's teaching hospitals
    Smith, CA
    Varkey, AB
    Evans, AT
    Reilly, BM
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 19 (07) : 766 - 771
  • [4] TEACHING PEER REVIEW
    PETERSON, P
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1973, 224 (06): : 884 - 885
  • [5] Teaching Peer Review
    Raphael, Ellen
    SCIENTIST, 2009, 23 (05): : 24 - 24
  • [6] PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING
    Alabi, Jaena
    Weare, William H., Jr.
    COMMUNICATIONS IN INFORMATION LITERACY, 2014, 8 (02) : 180 - 191
  • [7] Peer Review of Teaching
    Fernandez, Charles E.
    Yu, Jenny
    JOURNAL OF CHIROPRACTIC EDUCATION, 2007, 21 (02): : 154 - 161
  • [8] The Teaching Portfolio and Peer Review of Teaching
    Wilding, W. Vincent
    Ramsey, Jennifer
    Swan, Richard
    Taylor, Tina M.
    ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2023,
  • [9] Evaluating peer review using calibrated peer review.
    Russell, AA
    Chapman, OL
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2001, 222 : U220 - U220
  • [10] EVALUATING PEER REVIEWS - PILOT TESTING OF A GRADING INSTRUMENT
    FEURER, ID
    BECKER, GJ
    PICUS, D
    RAMIREZ, E
    DARCY, MD
    HICKS, ME
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 272 (02): : 98 - 100