Design of a questionnaire for detecting contact lens discomfort: the Contact Lens Discomfort Index

被引:8
|
作者
Arroyo-del Arroyo, Cristina [1 ]
Fernandez, Itziar [1 ,2 ]
de la Rosa, Alberto [1 ]
Pinto-Fraga, Jose [1 ]
Gonzalez-Garcia, Maria J. [1 ,2 ]
Lopez-Miguel, Alberto [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valladolid, Inst Univ Oftalmobiol Aplicada IOBA, Valladolid, Spain
[2] Networking Res Ctr Bioengn Biomat & Nanomed CIBER, Valladolid, Spain
[3] Inst Salud Carlos III, Redes Temat Invest Cooperat Salud Oftared, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Contact lens; discomfort; questionnaire; symptoms; TFOS INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP; SUBCOMMITTEE; CLDEQ-8;
D O I
10.1080/08164622.2021.1896945
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Background: The objective of this study was to design a new questionnaire for identifying CLD, based on the currently established CLD definition considered in the Tear Film and Ocular Surface CLD Workshop. Methods: A survey to characterise CL wearers was created and administered. Some items of the survey were selected by a focus group and analysed using a Rasch model to develop a questionnaire to identify CLD. Unidimensionality was checked applying principal components analysis. To build a plausible CLD classification (symptomatic vs asymptomatic), an unsupervised cluster analysis was used. Gower's general similarity coefficient, the partitioning around medoids algorithm, and the silhouette width were calculated. The reliability of the questionnaire was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and Cohen's kappa coefficient. A study was performed to compare this questionnaire with the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ)-8. Results: The 31-item survey was completed by 1104 volunteers, and the posterior analysis resulted in a 9-item questionnaire, the Contact Lens Discomfort Index (CLDI). It showed a good fit with the model (mean square infit and outfit values range was 0.76-1.10), and good unidimensionality (eigenvalues <= 1.3). The CLDI score range was 0-18 and the cut-off score for identifying CLD was 8. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.94), and kappa was 0.67 (95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.93). Comparison of the CLDI with the CLDEQ-8 in a sample of 58 CL wearers showed that 70.7% were classified equally by both questionnaires. Conclusions: The CLDI is a well-structured instrument, with acceptable psychometric properties, making it a valid and reliable tool to measure CL-related symptoms.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 274
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Contact Lens Solutions and Contact Lens Discomfort: Examining the Correlations Between Solution Components, Keratitis, and Contact Lens Discomfort
    Kuc, Christopher J.
    Lebow, Kenneth A.
    [J]. EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 44 (06): : 355 - 366
  • [2] Measuring Contact Lens Discomfort
    Isabelle Jalbert
    Blanka Golebiowski
    Fiona Stapleton
    [J]. Current Ophthalmology Reports, 2015, 3 (2) : 106 - 110
  • [3] Rethinking contact lens discomfort
    Efron, Nathan
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2018, 101 (01) : 1 - 3
  • [4] Impact of Contact Lens Material, Design, and Fitting on Discomfort
    Stapleton, Fiona
    Tan, Jacqueline
    [J]. EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2017, 43 (01): : 32 - 39
  • [5] Is There a Role for Inflammation in Contact Lens Discomfort?
    Willcox, Mark D. P.
    [J]. EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2017, 43 (01): : 5 - 16
  • [6] Temporal considerations in contact lens discomfort
    Papas, Eric B.
    Chiem, Annie
    Zhang, George
    Mobeen, Rabia
    Lee, Ling
    [J]. CONTACT LENS & ANTERIOR EYE, 2021, 44 (01): : 14 - 17
  • [7] Advances in Understanding Contact Lens Discomfort
    Twa, Michael D.
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2016, 93 (08) : 787 - 789
  • [8] The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: Report of the Contact Lens Materials, Design, and Care Subcommittee
    Jones, Lyndon
    Brennan, Noel A.
    Gonzalez-Meijome, Jose
    Lally, John
    Maldonado-Codina, Carole
    Schmidt, Tannin A.
    Subbaraman, Lakshman
    Young, Graeme
    Nichols, Jason J.
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (11) : 37 - 70
  • [9] Meibomian Gland Dysfunction and Contact Lens Discomfort
    Arita, Reiko
    Fukuoka, Shima
    Morishige, Naoyuki
    [J]. EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2017, 43 (01): : 17 - 22
  • [10] Tear film parameters and contact lens discomfort
    Szczesna-Iskander, Dorota Helena
    Jamiol, Paulina
    Biazik, Malgorzata
    Ogar, Angelika
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2015, 56 (07)