Fatigue in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving sunitinib on an intermittent versus continuous dosing schedule in a randomized phase II trial

被引:7
|
作者
Cella, David [1 ,2 ]
Jensen, Sally E. [1 ,3 ]
Hahn, Elizabeth A. [1 ,2 ]
Beaumont, Jennifer L. [1 ]
Korytowsky, Beata [4 ]
Bhattacharyya, Helen [5 ]
Motzer, Robert [6 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Med Social Sci, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Organ Transplantat, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Pfizer Oncol, Global Hlth Econ & Outcomes Res, New York, NY USA
[5] Pfizer Specialty Care BU, Stat, New York, NY USA
[6] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, New York, NY 10021 USA
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2014年 / 3卷 / 05期
关键词
Fatigue; quality of life; renal cell carcinoma; sunitinib; CANCER-RELATED FATIGUE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; INTERFERON-ALPHA; VALIDATION; INHIBITOR; PAZOPANIB; RECEPTOR; MARKERS;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.286
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
A phase II trial in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) found efficacy or safety between patients receiving oral sunitinib 50 4 weeks followed by 2-week off-treatment (Schedule 4/2) and 37.5 mg continuous daily sunitinib. We hypothesized that fatigue more variable "on-off" effect with the 4/2 schedule. A total of completed two fatigue-related items on Days 1 and 29 of each Mean absolute slopes were compared across treatments. A planned item "I feel fatigued" demonstrated that the mean absolute slope Schedule 4/2 compared to continuous dosing (0.042 vs. 0.032, P = analysis based on the change from Day 1 to Day 29 (0.52 vs. 0.21, and, separately, Day 29 to the next Day 1 (-0.38 vs. -0.05, P < the changes to be significantly larger in Schedule 4/2 than "I have a lack of energy" showed a similar pattern graphically, planned analysis was not statistically significant based on the but was when Day 1 to Day 29 and Day 29 to Day 1 changes separately. The 4/2 arm was associated with a greater degree of fatigue reflecting a possible "on-off" effect whereby patients schedule reported less fatigue at the beginning of each cycle 29. The findings can inform care for individuals with advanced intermittent dosing of sunitinib.
引用
收藏
页码:1353 / 1358
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Randomized Phase II Trial of Sunitinib on an Intermittent Versus Continuous Dosing Schedule As First-Line Therapy for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
    Motzer, Robert J.
    Hutson, Thomas E.
    Olsen, Mark R.
    Hudes, Gary R.
    Burke, John M.
    Edenfield, William J.
    Wilding, George
    Agarwal, Neeraj
    Thompson, John A.
    Cella, David
    Bello, Akintunde
    Korytowsky, Beata
    Yuan, Jinyu
    Valota, Olga
    Martell, Bridget
    Hariharan, Subramanian
    Figlin, Robert A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (12) : 1371 - 1377
  • [2] Continuous or intermittent? On the dosing schedule of sunitinib for advanced renal cell carcinoma
    Nozawa, Masahiro
    Uemura, Hirotsugu
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2012, 1 (04) : 202 - 203
  • [3] Re: Randomized Phase II Trial of Sunitinib on an Intermittent versus Continuous Dosing Schedule as First-Line Therapy for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Editorial Comment
    Taneja, Samir S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 188 (02): : 413 - 414
  • [4] Randomized phase II multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of sunitinib on the 4/2 versus continuous dosing schedule as first-line therapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Renal EFFECT Trial
    Motzer, R. J.
    Hutson, T. E.
    Olsen, M. R.
    Hudes, G. R.
    Burke, J. M.
    Edenfield, W. J.
    Wilding, G.
    Martell, B.
    Hariharan, S.
    Figlin, R. A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (07)
  • [5] Prognostic relevance of sunitinib toxicities and comparison of continuous vs. intermittent sunitinib dosing schedule in metastatic renal cell cancer patients
    Ordu, Cetin
    Pilanci, Kezban N.
    Avci, Nilufer
    Yildiz, Ibrahim
    Alco, Gul
    Demirhan, Ozkan
    Koksal, Ulkuhan I.
    Elbuken, Filiz
    Tecimer, Coskun
    Demir, Gokhan
    WSPOLCZESNA ONKOLOGIA-CONTEMPORARY ONCOLOGY, 2016, 20 (02): : 147 - 152
  • [6] ASPEN: A randomized phase II trial of everolimus versus sunitinib in patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma
    Armstrong, Andrew J.
    Halabi, Susan
    Eisen, Tim
    Stadler, Walter Michael
    Jones, Robert R.
    Vaishampayan, Ultra N.
    Garcia, Jorge A.
    Hawkins, Robert E.
    Kollmannsberger, Christian K.
    Lusk, Christine
    Broderick, Samuel
    George, Daniel J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)
  • [7] A phase II study of sunitinib on a continuous dosing schedule in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory urothelial carcinoma (UC)
    Gallagher, D. J.
    Milowsky, M. I.
    Gerst, S. R.
    Tickoo, S.
    Ishill, N.
    Ishill, N.
    Regazzi, A.
    Trout, A.
    Bajorin, D. F.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (15)
  • [8] Phase II trial of continuous once-daily dosing of sunitinib as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma
    Barrios, Carlos H.
    Hernandez-Barajas, David
    Brown, Michael P.
    Lee, Se-Hoon
    Fein, Luis
    Liu, Jin-Hwang
    Hariharan, Subramanian
    Martell, Bridget A.
    Yuan, Jinyu
    Bello, Akintunde
    Wang, Zhixiao
    Mundayat, Rajiv
    Rha, Sun-Young
    CANCER, 2012, 118 (05) : 1252 - 1259
  • [9] Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Sunitinib by Dosing Schedule in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma or Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor
    Khosravan, Reza
    Motzer, Robert J.
    Fumagalli, Elena
    Rini, Brian I.
    CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2016, 55 (10) : 1251 - 1269
  • [10] Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Sunitinib by Dosing Schedule in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma or Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor
    Reza Khosravan
    Robert J. Motzer
    Elena Fumagalli
    Brian I. Rini
    Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 2016, 55 : 1251 - 1269