Transfer of Land Use Rights in Rural China and Farmers' Utility: How to Select an Optimal Payment Mode of Land Increment Income

被引:5
|
作者
Yan, Lei [1 ]
Hong, Kairong [1 ]
Li, Hui [2 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Business, Changsha 410083, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ Forestry & Technol, Sch Econ, Changsha 410083, Peoples R China
关键词
payment mode; land institution reform; unified urban-rural land market; land increment income; farmers' utility; China; EXPROPRIATION COMPENSATION; CONSTRUCTION LAND; MARGINAL UTILITY; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; URBAN; PARTICIPATION; PROGRAMS; STAKEHOLDERS; CONSERVATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.3390/land10050450
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background: The distribution of farmers' increment income is the key to the transfer of land use rights. This research aims to detect the optimal payment mode for the distribution of land increment income obtained by farmers in land rights transfer. Methods: The research relied on case analysis, mathematical analysis, and numerical simulation. Results: According to China's existing payment modes for the increment income of rural collectively owned operating construction land (RCOCL), we summarized these payment modes into three: namely, lump-sum currency payment, a mixed payment of pension and lump-sum currency, and a mixed payment of dividend and lump-sum currency. If the land transfer price of RCOCL is lower than a specific value, the lump-sum currency payment will be optimal for farmers. Suppose the land transfer price is higher than this value. If the enterprise's profit margin is higher than the pension rate of return, the mixed payment of dividend and lump-sum currency will be optimal; if not, the mixed payment of pension and lump-sum currency will be optimal. Conclusions: Differences in regions, enterprise attributes, and farmers' characteristics will make the optimal proportion of pension or stock capital in land increment income (OPPSC) different. Generally, OPPSC is often between 40% and 60%.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How Do Farmers Realize Their Rights on the Collective Land in Rural China? An Explanatory Framework for Deconstructing the Subject of Collective Land Ownership
    Chen, Yixiang
    Jin, Xiangmu
    [J]. LAND, 2023, 12 (09)
  • [2] On the transaction values of land use rights in rural China
    Khantachavana, Sivalai V.
    Turvey, Calum G.
    Kong, Rong
    Xia, Xianli
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 2013, 41 (03) : 863 - 878
  • [3] Creating land markets for rural revitalization: Land transfer, property rights and gentrification in China
    Kan, Karita
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2021, 81 : 68 - 77
  • [4] Rural Land Transfer in the Information Age: Can Internet Use Affect Farmers' Land Transfer-In?
    Zhang, Fengwan
    Bao, Xueling
    Deng, Xin
    Xu, Dingde
    [J]. LAND, 2022, 11 (10)
  • [5] How does land transfer impact rural household income disparity? An empirical analysis based on the micro-perspective of farmers in China
    Wang, Bo
    Shao, Xuyang
    Yang, Xiao
    Xu, Honghai
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2023, 7
  • [6] Transfer or Surrender Rural Homestead Land? An Investigation of farmers' Preferences in China
    Zheng, Qiujie
    Diao, Weiyang
    Lu, Yonggang
    Wang, Yunfeng
    Chi, Guangqing
    [J]. CHINESE ECONOMY, 2024, 57 (01) : 61 - 81
  • [7] Farmers Are Growing Further and Further from the Land: Land Transfer and the Practice of Three Rights Separation in China
    Zhu Dongliang
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCES IN CHINA, 2021, 42 (02) : 24 - 43
  • [8] Farmers Are Growing Further and Further from the Land:Land Transfer and the Practice of Three Rights Separation in China
    Zhu Dongliang
    王文娥
    [J]. Social Sciences in China, 2021, 42 (02) : 24 - 43
  • [9] A study of the impact of land transfer decisions on household income in rural China
    Wang, Peng
    Wang, Fanzhi
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (10):
  • [10] Land transfer in rural China: incentives, influencing factors and income effects
    Peng, Kaili
    Yang, Chen
    Chen, Yao
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2020, 52 (50) : 5477 - 5490