A scalable empathic supervision intervention to mitigate recidivism from probation and parole

被引:14
|
作者
Okonofua, Jason A. [1 ]
Saadatian, Kimia [1 ]
Ocampo, Joseph [1 ]
Ruiz, Michael [1 ]
Oxholm, Perfecta Delgado [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif, Dept Psychol, Berekley, CA 94702 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Goldman Sch Publ Policy, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
intervention; recidivism; probation; parole; relationships;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.2018036118
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Incarceration is a pervasive issue in the United States that is enormously costly to families, communities, and society at large. The path from prison back to prison may depend on the relationship a person has with their probation or parole officer (PPO). If the relationship lacks appropriate care and trust, violations and recidivism (return to jail or prison) may be more likely to occur. Here, we test whether an "empathic supervision" intervention with PPOs-that aims to reduce collective blame against and promote empathy for the perspectives of adults on probation or parole (APPs)-can reduce rates of violations and recidivism. The intervention highlights the unreasonable expectation that all APPs will reoffend (collective blame) and the benefits of empathy-valuing APPs' perspectives. Using both within-subject (monthly official records for 10 mo) and between-subject (treatment versus control) comparisons in a longitudinal study with PPOs in a large US city (N-PPOs = 216; N-APPs=similar to 20,478), we find that the empathic supervision intervention reduced collective blame against APPs 10 mo postintervention and reduced between-subject violations and recidivism, a 13% reduction that would translate to less taxpayer costs if scaled. Together, these findings illustrate that very low-cost psychological interventions that target empathy in relationships can be cost effective and combat important societal outcomes in a lasting manner.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] INTERSTATE SUPERVISION OF PAROLE AND PROBATION
    BRENDES, RC
    [J]. CRIME & DELINQUENCY, 1968, 14 (03) : 253 - 260
  • [2] From Supervision to Opportunity: Reimagining Probation and Parole
    Harding, David J.
    Western, Bruce
    Sandelson, Jasmin A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2022, 701 (01): : 8 - 25
  • [3] CONCEPTS OF TREATMENT IN PROBATION AND PAROLE SUPERVISION
    NEWMAN, CL
    [J]. FEDERAL PROBATION, 1961, 25 (01) : 11 - 18
  • [4] SOME EFFECTS OF PAROLE SUPERVISION ON RECIDIVISM
    JACKSON, PC
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY, 1983, 23 (01): : 17 - 34
  • [5] Liability issues affecting probation and parole supervision
    Morgan, KD
    Belbot, BA
    Clark, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 1997, 25 (03) : 211 - 222
  • [6] THE CONNECTION OF PROBATION/PAROLE OFFICER ACTIONS TO WOMEN OFFENDERS' RECIDIVISM
    Morash, Merry
    Kashy, Deborah A.
    Smith, Sandi W.
    Cobbina, Jennifer E.
    [J]. CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2016, 43 (04) : 506 - 524
  • [7] Predicting violence and recidivism in a large sample of males on probation or parole
    Prell, Lettie
    Vitacco, Michael J.
    Zavodny, Denis
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 49 : 107 - 113
  • [8] Psychiatric Disorders and Recidivism among Korean Adolescents on Probation or Parole
    Lim, Yooli
    Park, Eun-Jin
    Kim, Bongseog
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 2018, 15 (06) : 561 - 567
  • [9] PROBATION AND PAROLE SUPERVISION - A REVIEW OF CURRENT CLASSIFICATION PRACTICES
    CLEAR, TR
    GALLAGHER, KW
    [J]. CRIME & DELINQUENCY, 1985, 31 (03) : 423 - 443
  • [10] Measuring the Effect of Probation and Parole Officers on Labor Market Outcomes and Recidivism
    Andersen, Lars H.
    Wildeman, Christopher
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2015, 31 (04) : 629 - 652