Growth and physiology of basmati rice under conventional and water-saving production systems

被引:17
|
作者
Jabran, Khawar [1 ,2 ]
Ullah, Ehsan [1 ]
Akbar, Nadeem [1 ]
Yasin, Muhammad [3 ]
Zaman, Umar [4 ]
Nasim, Wajid [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Riaz, Muhammad [8 ,9 ]
Arjumend, Tuba [10 ]
Azhar, Muhammad Farooq [11 ]
Hussain, Mubshar [12 ]
机构
[1] Univ Agr Faisalabad, Dept Agron, Faisalabad, Pakistan
[2] Duzce Univ, Fac Agr & Nat Sci, Dept Plant Protect, Duzce, Turkey
[3] Univ Sargodha, Univ Coll Agr, Dept Agron, Sargodha, Pakistan
[4] Univ Agr Faisalabad, Inst Soil & Environm Sci, Faisalabad, Pakistan
[5] COMSATS Inst Informat Technol CIIT, Dept Environm Sci, Vehari, Pakistan
[6] CIHEAM Inst Agron Mediterraneen Montpellier IAMM, Montpellier, France
[7] CSIRO Ecosyst Sci & Sustainable Agr Flagship, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia
[8] Sejong Univ, Dept Food Sci & Technol, Seoul, South Korea
[9] Bahauddin Zakariya Univ, Inst Food Sci & Nutr, Multan, Pakistan
[10] Yeditepe Univ, Dept Genet & Bioengn, Istanbul, Turkey
[11] Bahauddin Zakariya Univ, Dept Forestry & Range Management, Multan, Pakistan
[12] Bahauddin Zakariya Univ, Dept Agron, Multan, Pakistan
关键词
Cultivars; growth; cultivation systems; photosynthetic rate; stomatal conductance; DRYING IRRIGATION; PLANT HEIGHT; WHEAT SYSTEM; AEROBIC RICE; CHINA; YIELD; PERFORMANCE; PHILIPPINES; PERCOLATION; TILLAGE;
D O I
10.1080/03650340.2017.1285014
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Conventionally flooded rice (CFR) requires enormous water and labor inputs. Water scarcity aspires for cultivation of water-saving rice. Growth response and physiology of basmati rice genotypes under the water-saving production systems has not been reported yet. Studies were conducted for 2 years to compare the growth and physiology of three rice cultivars (Super Basmati, Basmati-2000 and Shaheen Basmati), under high (CFR), medium (alternate wetting and drying [AWD]) and low water input (aerobic rice [AR]) systems. Leaf area index, crop growth rate, leaf area duration and dry matter accumulation were higher for AR followed by AWD and CFR, respectively. Shaheen Basmati had a lower growth and relative water contents than Super Basmati and Basmati-2000, probably due to its shorter stature and shorter life cycle. Photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance of rice cultivars in the different production were affected only at reproductive stage. Basmati-2000 grown as AR had the highest photosynthetic rate followed by the same cultivar under AWD. The results of this study provide us an idea that basmati cultivars can attain a high growth and development with low water input. This would be helpful to grow rice successfully under water-short rice-growing environments.
引用
收藏
页码:1465 / 1476
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] WATER SAVING, WATER PRODUCTIVITY AND YIELD OUTPUTS OF FINE-GRAIN RICE CULTIVARS UNDER CONVENTIONAL AND WATER-SAVING RICE PRODUCTION SYSTEMS
    Jabran, K.
    Ullah, E.
    Hussain, M.
    Farooq, M.
    Haider, N.
    Chauhan, B. S.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2015, 51 (04) : 567 - 581
  • [2] Mulching Improves Crop Growth, Grain Length, Head Rice and Milling Recovery of Basmati Rice Grown in Water-saving Production Systems
    Jabran, Khawar
    Ullah, Ehsan
    Akbar, Nadeem
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 17 (05) : 920 - 928
  • [3] Economic assessment of different mulches in conventional and water-saving rice production systems
    Khawar Jabran
    Mubshar Hussain
    Shah Fahad
    Muhammad Farooq
    Ali Ahsan Bajwa
    Hesham Alharrby
    Wajid Nasim
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2016, 23 : 9156 - 9163
  • [4] Economic assessment of different mulches in conventional and water-saving rice production systems
    Jabran, Khawar
    Hussain, Mubshar
    Fahad, Shah
    Farooq, Muhammad
    Bajwa, Ali Ahsan
    Alharrby, Hesham
    Nasim, Wajid
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2016, 23 (09) : 9156 - 9163
  • [5] Improving the performance of short-duration basmati rice in water-saving production systems by boron nutrition
    Rehman, A.
    Farooq, M.
    Nawaz, A.
    Ahmad, R.
    [J]. ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 2016, 168 (01) : 19 - 28
  • [6] Modeling water consumption, N fates, and rice yield for water-saving and conventional rice production systems
    Liang, Hao
    Yang, Shihong
    Xu, Junzeng
    Hu, Kelin
    [J]. SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2021, 209
  • [7] Mulching Improves Water Productivity, Yield and Quality of Fine Rice under Water-saving Rice Production Systems
    Jabran, K.
    Ullah, E.
    Hussain, M.
    Farooq, M.
    Zaman, U.
    Yaseen, M.
    Chauhan, B. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE, 2015, 201 (05) : 389 - 400
  • [8] EFFECT OF WATER-SAVING TECHNOLOGIES ON GROWTH, YIELD, AND WATER-SAVING POTENTIAL OF LOWLAND RICE
    Ullah, Hayat
    Datta, Avishek
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 9 (07) : 1375 - 1383
  • [9] Effects of Different Water Management on Growth Physiology and Water-saving of Dry Direct Seeding Rice
    不同水分管理旱直播水稻生长生理与节水效应
    [J]. Liu, Hui (xiaolaida@163.com), 2018, Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery (49):
  • [10] Effects of straw returning on rice growth and yield under water-saving irrigation
    Wei, Qi
    Xu, Junzeng
    Sun, Lu
    Wang, Haiyu
    Lv, Yuping
    Li, Yawei
    Hammed, Fazli
    [J]. CHILEAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2019, 79 (01): : 66 - 74