Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy in super-obese and super-super-obese patients: a national database analysis

被引:26
|
作者
Nasser, Hassan [1 ]
Ivanics, Tommy [1 ]
Leonard-Murali, Shravan [1 ]
Shakaroun, Dania [2 ]
Genaw, Jeffrey [1 ]
机构
[1] Henry Ford Hosp, Dept Surg, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[2] Henry Ford Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
关键词
Bariatric surgery; Sleeve gastrectomy; Gastric bypass; Super-obesity; Super-super-obesity; Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program; BODY-MASS INDEX; BMI GREATER-THAN-OR-EQUAL-TO-60 KG/M(2); SURGICAL SITE INFECTION; BARIATRIC-SURGERY; MORBIDLY OBESE; UNITED-STATES; COMPLICATIONS; EPIDEMIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.soard.2019.07.026
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Evidence remains contradictory for perioperative outcomes of super-obese (SO) and super-super-obese (SSO) patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Objective: To identify national 30-day morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in SO and SSO patients. Setting: The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database. Methods: All LSG and LRYGB patients from 2015 through 2017 in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database were grouped based on body mass index (BMI) as follows: morbidly obese (MO; BMI 35.0-49.9 kg/m(2)), SO (BMI 50.0-59.9 kg/m(2)), and SSO (BMI > 60.0 kg/m(2)). Complications and mortality within 30 days were compared between BMI groups using Pearson X-2 or Fischers exact tests. Multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for demographic characteristics and co-morbidities, and adjusted odds ratio (AOR) was reported for each outcome. Results: Of 356,621 patients, 71.6% had LSG and 28.4% LRYGB. A total of 272,195 patients were in the MO group, 65,565 in the SO group, and 18,861 in the SSO group. Higher BMI was associated with increased overall morbidity and mortality. The overall complication rate was significantly higher for SO (AOR = 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.28 for LSG; AOR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.15 for LRYGB) and SSO (AOR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.31-1.58 for LSG; AOR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.19-1.45 for LRYGB) compared with the MO group. Mortality was also significantly higher for SO (AOR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.10-2.48 for LSG; AOR = 1.85, 95% CI 1.23-2.80 for LRYGB) and SSO (AOR = 3.30, 95% CI 1.98-5.48 for LSG; AOR = 3.32, 95% CI 1.93-5.73 for LRYGB) compared with the MO group. Conclusions: SO and SSO patients are at increased risk of 30-day morbidity and mortality compared with MO patients. Despite this elevated perioperative risk, the overall risk of these procedures remains low and acceptable especially as bariatric surgery is the durable treatment option for obesity. (C) 2019 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1696 / 1703
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcomes of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in super-super-obese patients
    Mehaffey, J. Hunter
    LaPar, Damien J.
    Turrentine, Florence E.
    Miller, Michael S.
    Hallowell, Peter T.
    Schirmer, Bruce D.
    [J]. SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2015, 11 (04) : 814 - 819
  • [2] Is Roux-en-Y gastric bypass adequate in the super-obese?
    Sánchez-Santos, R
    Vilarrasa, N
    Pujol, J
    Moreno, P
    Francos, JM
    Rafecas, A
    Masdevall, C
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2006, 16 (04) : 478 - 483
  • [3] Is Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Adequate in the Super-Obese?
    Raquel Sánchez-Santos
    Nuria Vilarrasa
    Jorge Pujol
    Pablo Moreno
    Jose Manuel Francos
    Antonio Rafecas
    Carlos Masdevall
    [J]. Obesity Surgery, 2006, 16 : 478 - 483
  • [4] Surgical management of super–super obese patients: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy
    Raquel Gonzalez-Heredia
    Lisa Sanchez-Johnsen
    Valeria S. M. Valbuena
    Mario Masrur
    Melissa Murphey
    Enrique Elli
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2016, 30 : 2097 - 2102
  • [5] Comparative effectiveness of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy in super obese patients
    Adam C. Celio
    Qiang Wu
    Kevin R. Kasten
    Mark L. Manwaring
    Walter J. Pories
    Konstantinos Spaniolas
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 : 317 - 323
  • [6] Comparative effectiveness of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy in super obese patients
    Celio, Adam C.
    Wu, Qiang
    Kasten, Kevin R.
    Manwaring, Mark L.
    Pories, Walter J.
    Spaniolas, Konstantinos
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (01): : 317 - 323
  • [7] Surgical management of super-super obese patients: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy
    Gonzalez-Heredia, Raquel
    Sanchez-Johnsen, Lisa
    Valbuena, Valeria S. M.
    Masrur, Mario
    Murphey, Melissa
    Elli, Enrique
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (05): : 2097 - 2102
  • [8] LAPAROSCOPIC ADJUSTABLE BANDED ROUX-EN-Y GASTRIC BYPASS AS A PRIMARY PROCEDURE FOR THE SUPER-SUPER-OBESE: FIRST CASES
    Van Dessel, E.
    Dillemans, B.
    Van Cauwenberge, S.
    Vercauteren, C.
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2012, 22 (08) : 1151 - 1151
  • [9] Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in the Super-obese
    Nasser, Hassan
    Ivanics, Tommy
    Ranjal, Rohit Shenoy
    Leonard-Murali, Shravan
    Genaw, Jeffrey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 249 : 34 - 41
  • [10] Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A safe technique for super-super-obese patients
    Cascardo, Antonio J.
    Sionne, Giuseppe
    Pilone, Vincenzo
    Valente, Patricia
    Torchia, Fiore
    Civitelli, Simona
    Tricarico, Pasquale
    Cariello, Pasquale
    Di Maro, Antonio
    Aloia, Cristina
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2007, 17 (01) : 117 - 117