Expression of E6AP and PML predicts for prostate cancer progression and cancer-specific death

被引:21
|
作者
Birch, S. E. [1 ]
Kench, J. G. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Takano, E. [1 ]
Chan, P. [1 ]
Chan, A. -L. [6 ]
Chiam, K. [5 ]
Veillard, A. -S. [7 ]
Stricker, P. [5 ,8 ]
Haupt, S. [6 ]
Haupt, Y. [6 ,9 ]
Horvath, L. [4 ,5 ,10 ]
Fox, S. B. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Peter MacCallum Canc, Dept Pathol, East Melbourne, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Pathol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Dept Tissue Pathol & Diagnost Oncol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[5] Garvan Inst Med Res, Kinghorn Canc Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Univ Melbourne, Dept Pathol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Univ Sydney, NHMRC Clin Trial Ctr, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[8] St Vincents Clin, Dept Urol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[9] Monash Univ, Dept Biochem & Mol Biol, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[10] Chris OBrien Lifehouse, Dept Med Oncol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
E6AP; PML; prostate cancer; prognostic marker; cancer recurrence; SENESCENCE;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdu454
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The promyelocytic leukemia (PML) tumor suppressor plays an important role in the response to a variety of cellular stressors and its expression is downregulated or lost in a range of human tumors. We have previously shown that the E3 ligase E6-associated protein (E6AP) is an important regulator of PML protein stability but the relationship and clinical impact of PML and E6AP expression in prostatic carcinoma is unknown. Methods: E6AP and PML expression was assessed in tissue microarrays from a phase I discovery cohort of 170 patients treated by radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer (PC). Correlation analysis was carried out between PML and E6AP expression and clinicopathological variates including PSA as a surrogate of disease recurrence. The results were confirmed in a phase II validation cohort of 318 patients with associated clinical recurrence and survival data. Results: Survival analysis of the phase I cohort revealed that patients whose tumors showed reduced PML and high E6AP expression had reduced time to PSA relapse (P = 0.012). This was confirmed in the phase II validation cohort where the expression profile of high E6AP/low PML was significantly associated with reduced time to PSA relapse (P < 0.001), clinical relapse (P = 0.016) and PC-specific death (P = 0.014). In multivariate analysis, this expression profile was an independent prognostic indicator of PSA relapse and clinical relapse independent of clinicopathologic factors predicting recurrence. Conclusion: This study identifies E6AP and PML as potential prognostic markers in localized prostate carcinoma and supports a role for E6AP in driving the downregulation or loss of PML expression in prostate carcinomas.
引用
收藏
页码:2392 / 2397
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] E6AP Promotes a Metastatic Phenotype in Prostate Cancer
    Gamell, Cristina
    Bandilovska, Ivona
    Gulati, Twishi
    Kogan, Arielle
    Lim, Syer Choon
    Kovacevic, Zaklina
    Takano, Elena A.
    Timpone, Clelia
    Agupitan, Arjelle D.
    Litchfield, Cassandra
    Blandino, Giovanni
    Horvath, Lisa G.
    Fox, Stephen B.
    Williams, Scott G.
    Russo, Andrea
    Gallo, Enzo
    Paul, Piotr J.
    Mitchell, Catherine
    Sandhu, Shahneen
    Keam, Simon P.
    Haupt, Sue
    Richardson, Des R.
    Haupt, Ygal
    ISCIENCE, 2019, 22 : 1 - +
  • [2] E6AP promotes prostate cancer by reducing p27 expression
    Raghu, Dinesh
    Paul, Piotr Jan
    Gulati, Twishi
    Deb, Siddhartha
    Khoo, Christine
    Russo, Andrea
    Gallo, Enzo
    Blandino, Giovanni
    Chan, Ai-Leen
    Takano, Elena
    Sandhu, Shahneen K.
    Fox, Stephen B.
    Williams, Scott
    Haupt, Sue
    Gamell, Cristina
    Haupt, Ygal
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (26) : 42939 - 42948
  • [3] siRNA inhibition of E6AP expression in cervical cancer cells
    Iancu, I. V.
    Plesa, A.
    Botezatu, A.
    Huica, I.
    Anton, G.
    FEBS JOURNAL, 2011, 278 : 329 - 329
  • [4] HPV E6, E6AP and cervical cancer
    Beaudenon, Sylvie
    Huibregtse, Jon M.
    BMC BIOCHEMISTRY, 2008, 9
  • [5] Defining the Involvement of the E6AP-PML Axis in Prostate Cancer
    Chan, A. -L.
    Lambeth, L.
    Horvath, L.
    Kench, J.
    Williams, E.
    Haupt, S.
    Fox, S.
    Haupt, Y.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 : S25 - S25
  • [6] E6AP promotes the degradation of the PML tumor suppressor
    Louria-Hayon, I.
    Alsheich-Bartok, O.
    Levav-Cohen, Y.
    Silberman, I.
    Berger, M.
    Grossman, T.
    Matentzoglu, K.
    Jiang, Y-H
    Muller, S.
    Scheffner, M.
    Haupt, S.
    Haupt, Y.
    CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATION, 2009, 16 (08): : 1156 - 1166
  • [7] E6AP promotes the degradation of the PML tumor suppressor
    I Louria-Hayon
    O Alsheich-Bartok
    Y Levav-Cohen
    I Silberman
    M Berger
    T Grossman
    K Matentzoglu
    Y-H Jiang
    S Muller
    M Scheffner
    S Haupt
    Y Haupt
    Cell Death & Differentiation, 2009, 16 : 1156 - 1166
  • [8] Restoration of tumor suppression in prostate cancer by targeting the E3 ligase E6AP
    Paul, P. J.
    Raghu, D.
    Chan, A-L
    Gulati, T.
    Lambeth, L.
    Takano, E.
    Herold, M. J.
    Hagekyriakou, J.
    Vessella, R. L.
    Fedele, C.
    Shackleton, M.
    Williams, E. D.
    Fox, S.
    Williams, S.
    Haupt, S.
    Gamell, C.
    Haupt, Y.
    ONCOGENE, 2016, 35 (48) : 6235 - 6245
  • [9] Restoration of tumor suppression in prostate cancer by targeting the E3 ligase E6AP
    P J Paul
    D Raghu
    A-L Chan
    T Gulati
    L Lambeth
    E Takano
    M J Herold
    J Hagekyriakou
    R L Vessella
    C Fedele
    M Shackleton
    E D Williams
    S Fox
    S Williams
    S Haupt
    C Gamell
    Y Haupt
    Oncogene, 2016, 35 : 6235 - 6245
  • [10] ESTIMATING PROSTATE CANCER RELATIVE SURVIVAL AND CANCER-SPECIFIC DEATH
    Morrell, Christopher H.
    Kattan, Michael W.
    MacKintosh, F. Roy
    Van den Eeden, Stephen
    Neville, Thomas B.
    ADVANCES AND APPLICATIONS IN STATISTICS, 2015, 46 (03) : 197 - 223