Groundwater governance: a review of the assessment methodologies

被引:7
|
作者
Saurav, K. C. [1 ]
Shrestha, Sangam [1 ,2 ]
Nguyen, Thi Phuoc Lai [3 ]
Das Gupta, Ashim [1 ]
Mohanasundaram, S. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Asian Inst Technol, Sch Engn & Technol, Klongluang 12120, Pathum Thani, Thailand
[2] Asia Ctr, Stockholm Environm Inst, Chulalongkorn Soi 64,Phayathai Rd, Bangkok 1033, Thailand
[3] Asian Inst Technol AIT, Sch Environm Resources & Dev, Klongluang 12120, Pathum Thani, Thailand
[4] Univ Technol Sydney, 15 Broadway, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS | 2022年 / 30卷 / 02期
关键词
water governance; aquifer management; groundwater governance framework; climate change; urbanisation; URBAN WATER GOVERNANCE; OECD PRINCIPLES; SURFACE-WATER; DPSIR MODEL; RIVER-BASIN; FRAMEWORK; CLIMATE; SUSTAINABILITY; ENVIRONMENT; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.1139/er-2021-0066
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Groundwater, the world's largest and most exploited freshwater resource is a crucial ingredient for global socioeconomic development. However, the domination of human-induced drivers such as climate change, rapid demographic escalation, alteration in land use, industrialisation, and an increase in water demand has further stressed the unfrozen freshwater resources. This review provides a comprehensive literature-based analysis on different assessment methodologies for groundwater governance, and critically analysed the applicability and knowledge gaps in the assessment methodologies for evaluating groundwater governance under climatic and nonclimatic stresses. Furthermore, in the absence of a designated groundwater governance framework under stress, the study emphasized the need for developing a ready-to-use groundwater governance framework to assess the existing state of governance, tackling the prevailing knowledge gaps. A multidimensional framework consisting of key groundwater governance elements, the inclusion of the vulnerable and marginalised groups, current and future stressors, and an approach for aggregating multiple elements would overcome the limitations in previous assessment methodologies. Additionally, this framework would contribute to understanding current governance provisions and the capacity to manage those provisions, realise the strengths, gaps, and areas for improvement, and quantitatively visualise the prevailing state of groundwater governance for planning multiple strategies to possible threats and conflicts from the stresses.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 216
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment methodologies for submarine groundwater discharge
    Taniguchi, M
    Burnett, WC
    Cable, JE
    Turner, JV
    LAND AND MARINE HYDROGEOLOGY, 2003, : 1 - 23
  • [2] A critical assessment of groundwater governance in Tunisia
    Frija, Aymen
    Chebil, Ali
    Speelman, Stijn
    Faysse, Nicolas
    WATER POLICY, 2014, 16 (02) : 358 - 373
  • [3] Groundwater governance in South Africa: A status assessment
    Pietersen, K.
    Beekman, H. E.
    Holland, M.
    Adams, S.
    WATER SA, 2012, 38 (03) : 453 - 459
  • [4] Intrinsic groundwater vulnerability assessment, comparison of different methodologies and validation
    Şener E.
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2021, 14 (19)
  • [5] Review of safety assessment methodologies in marine systems
    Lee, JK
    Park, BJ
    Lee, SS
    Lee, DK
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTEENTH (2005) INTERNATIONAL OFFSHORE AND POLAR ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOL 4, 2005, : 374 - 380
  • [6] Review of the methodologies used to derive groundwater characteristics for a specific area in The Netherlands
    Ritzema, H. P.
    Heuvelink, G. B. M.
    Heinen, M.
    Bogaart, P. W.
    van der Bolt, F. J. E.
    Broeke, M. J. D. Hack-ten
    Hoogland, T.
    Knotters, M.
    Massop, H. T. L.
    Vroon, H. R. J.
    van den Bosch, H.
    GEODERMA REGIONAL, 2018, 14
  • [7] Limitations in assessment methodologies of neighborhood sustainability assessment tools: A literature review
    Sharifi, Ayyoob
    Dawodu, Ayotunde
    Cheshmehzangi, Ali
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2021, 67
  • [8] A Brief Review of Strength and Ballistic Assessment Methodologies in Sport
    Daniel Travis McMaster
    Nicholas Gill
    John Cronin
    Michael McGuigan
    Sports Medicine, 2014, 44 : 603 - 623
  • [9] A Brief Review of Strength and Ballistic Assessment Methodologies in Sport
    McMaster, Daniel Travis
    Gill, Nicholas
    Cronin, John
    McGuigan, Michael
    SPORTS MEDICINE, 2014, 44 (05) : 603 - 623
  • [10] Sustainability in Servitization: A Review of Assessment Methodologies for the Steel Sector
    Galimberti, Mattia
    Cimini, Chiara
    Cavalieri, Sergio
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2024, 58 (19): : 640 - 645