Cutoff value of 1 h, 50 g glucose challenge test for screening of gestational diabetes mellitus in a Japanese population

被引:18
|
作者
Miyakoshi, K [1 ]
Tanaka, M [1 ]
Ueno, K [1 ]
Uehara, K [1 ]
Ishimoto, H [1 ]
Yoshimura, Y [1 ]
机构
[1] Keio Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
关键词
gestational diabetes mellitus; glucose challenge test; cutoff value; a Japanese population;
D O I
10.1016/S0168-8227(02)00274-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
A total of 2651 consecutive native Japanese women who underwent a glucose challenge test (GCT) were retrospectively investigated. GCT was performed between 24 and 27 weeks of gestation; each subject received a 50 g oral glucose load without regard to the fasting or fed state, followed by a determination of I h venous plasma glucose level. Women demonstrating GCT exceeding 130 mg/dl received a 75 g, 2 h oral glucose tolerance test to determine whether or not they had gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). All women with GDM were treated with a strict diabetic protocol including insulin therapy. Forty-nine (1.8%) women were diagnosed to have GDM. The receiver-operator characteristic curve identified a GCT finding above 140 mg/dl as the cutoff value for detecting GDM, which showed a sensitivity and specificity of 96 and 76%, respectively. Our results suggest that the cutoff value of a 50 g GCT is 140 mg/dl to identify pregnancies with GDM in a Japanese population. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 67
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cut-off value of 1-h, 50-g glucose challenge test for screening of gestational diabetes mellitus in an Iranian population
    Gandevani, Samira Behboudi
    Garshasbi, Ahia
    Dibaj, Shiva
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2011, 37 (06) : 534 - 537
  • [2] SCREENING FOR GESTATIONAL DIABETES MELLITUS WITH 1 HOUR 50G ORAL GLUCOSE CHALLENGE TEST IN PREGNANCY
    Hogade, Annapurna V.
    Rudrawadi, Mangala B.
    Krupa, Sneha
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2013, 2 (39): : 7560 - 7563
  • [3] Cut-off value of 50 g glucose challenge test for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus
    Boriboonhirunsarn, D.
    Lertbunnaphong, T.
    Khanmali, P.
    DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2012, 28 : 90 - 90
  • [4] 50 Grams Oral Glucose Challenge Test: Is It an Effective Screening Test for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus?
    Abu-Heija A.
    Al-Bash M.
    Ishrat N.
    Al-Kharausi L.
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2016, 66 (Suppl 1) : 7 - 11
  • [5] Efficacy of 50-G Glucose Challenge Test in The Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
    Inan, Cihan
    Agir, Meric Cagri
    Sagir, Fulya Gokdagli
    HASEKI TIP BULTENI-MEDICAL BULLETIN OF HASEKI, 2014, 52 (03): : 181 - 186
  • [6] Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus - Can we use the 50-g glucose challenge test of the previous pregnancy?
    Rottenstreich, Misgav
    Rotem, Reut
    Hirsch, Ayala
    Farkash, Rivka
    Reichman, Orna
    Rottenstreich, Amihai
    Samueloff, Arnon
    Sela, Hen Y.
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 158
  • [7] Accuracy of capillary blood glucose for 50-g glucose challenge test for gestational diabetes screening
    Dittakarn Boriboonhirunsarn
    Amporn Robkhonburi
    Maria Asad-dehghan
    Diabetology International, 2022, 13 : 561 - 565
  • [8] Accuracy of capillary blood glucose for 50-g glucose challenge test for gestational diabetes screening
    Boriboonhirunsarn, Dittakarn
    Robkhonburi, Amporn
    Asad-dehghan, Maria
    DIABETOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 13 (03) : 561 - 565
  • [9] A comparison of fasting plasma glucose and glucose challenge test for screening of gestational diabetes mellitus
    Poomalar, G. K.
    Rangaswamy, V.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 33 (05) : 447 - 450
  • [10] Glucose challenge test-Is it an effective screening tool for gestational diabetes mellitus in low risk population?
    Navid, Sarwat
    Alam, Kinza
    Tasneem, Shahida
    RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 39 (04): : 428 - 431