Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Pharmacokinetically-Guided 5-Fluorouracil in FOLFOX Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

被引:34
|
作者
Goldstein, Daniel A. [1 ]
Chen, Qiushi [2 ]
Ayer, Turgay [2 ]
Howard, David H. [1 ,3 ]
Lipscomb, Joseph [1 ,3 ]
Harvey, R. Donald [1 ]
El-Rayes, Bassel F. [1 ]
Flowers, Christopher R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Winship Canc Inst, Dept Hematol & Med Oncol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, H Milton Stewart Sch Ind & Syst Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[3] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Body surface area; Colorectal neoplasms; Cost-benefit analysis; Fluorouracil; Quality-adjusted life years; FLUOROURACIL DOSE ADJUSTMENT; POSITIVE BREAST-CANCER; DECISION-MAKING; BEVACIZUMAB; TRIAL; OXALIPLATIN; REGIMENS; FOLFIRI; UTILITY; ASSAY;
D O I
10.1016/j.clcc.2014.09.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Dosing chemotherapy based on pharmacokinetics (PK) instead of body surface area (BSA) has been shown to decrease interindividual variability in drug exposure. PK-guided 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) instead of BSA-guided 5-FU for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) leads to decreased toxicity and increased overall survival (OS). In this article, we use Markov modeling to show that this is a cost-effective strategy, costing $23,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Background: Dosing chemotherapy based on BSA results in marked interindividual variability in drug exposure. A randomized trial showed increased OS and decreased toxicity with PK-guided compared with BSA-based 5-FU dosing in patients with mCRC. The objective of this study was to compare the cost effectiveness of PK-based 5-FU dosing with BSA-based 5-FU dosing in patients with mCRC receiving FOLFOX (5-FU, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin). Materials and Methods: We developed a Markov model to evaluate the cost effectiveness of PK FOLFOX compared with BSA FOLFOX. Progression risks and cause-specific mortality were extrapolated from the fitted survival models. Costs for administration and management of adverse events were estimated based on 2013 Medicare reimbursement rates and average sale prices. Results: PK FOLFOX provided 2.03 QALYs at a cost of $50,205 compared with BSA FOLFOX, which provided 1.46 QALYs at a cost of $37,173. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $22,695 per QALY. The ICER remained < $50,000 per QALY in all univariate and multivariate sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: At a $50,000 per QALY threshold, PK FOLFOX is cost effective for mCRC. Because of the cost effectiveness profile and OS advantage with PK FOLFOX, it should be evaluated further in comparative effectiveness studies.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 225
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-effectiveness analysis of pharmacokinetic-guided (PK) 5-fluorouracil (5FU) when combined with leucovorin and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
    Goldstein, Daniel A.
    Chen, Qiushi
    Howard, David H.
    Lipscomb, Joseph
    Ayer, Turgay
    Harvey, Donald
    El-Rayes, Bassel F.
    Flowers, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (15)
  • [2] Pharmacokinetically-guided preoperative FOLFOX chemotherapy for locally advanced colon cancer patients.
    Ceniceros, Lucia
    Baixauli, Jorge
    Aldaz, Azucena
    Arredondo, Jorge
    Pastor, Carlos
    Chopitea, Ana
    Granero, Lucia
    Martinez, Patricia
    Ponz-Sarvise, Mariano
    Manuel Lapuente, Fernando
    Luis Hernandez-Lizoain, Jose
    Rodriguez, Javier
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (15)
  • [3] Is XELOX equivalent to FOLFOX or other continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer?
    Douillard, Jean-Yves
    Bennouna, Jaafar
    Senellart, Helene
    CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, 2008, 7 (03) : 206 - 211
  • [4] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PHARMACOKINETIC DOSING OF 5-FLUOROURACIL IN METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
    Becker, R.
    Hollenbeak, C. S.
    Choma, A.
    Kenny, P.
    Salamone, S. J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (03) : A139 - A139
  • [5] Clinical Impact of Intensified 5-Fluorouracil-Based Chemotherapy Using a Prospective Pharmacokinetically-Guided Dosing Approach: Comparative Study in Elderly and Non-Elderly Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
    Duffour, J.
    Roca, L.
    Bressolle, F.
    Abderrahim, A. G.
    Poujol, S.
    Pinguet, F.
    Ychou, M.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 2010, 22 (03) : 179 - 185
  • [6] Clinical significance of bolus 5-fluorouracil for recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer treated with FOLFOX therapy
    Yoshida, Y.
    Hasegawa, J.
    Nezu, R.
    Mikata, S.
    Kim, Y.
    Nishimura, J.
    Hirota, M.
    Ota, K.
    Yoshikawa, K.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (15)
  • [7] 5-FLUOROURACIL, VINCRISTINE AND HYDROXYUREA COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY IN METASTATIC COLORECTAL-CANCER
    LIBERATI, AM
    DICOSTANZO, F
    BUZZI, F
    FATATI, G
    BISCOTTINI, B
    BALLATORI, E
    FALCHI, R
    GRIGNANI, F
    TUMORI, 1983, 69 (05) : 485 - 487
  • [8] Capecitabine in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy.
    Salek, T
    Mardiak, J
    Mego, M
    Hlavata, Z
    Obertova, J
    Sycova-Mila, Z
    Minarik, T
    Sufliarsky, J
    Bohunicky, L
    Thalmeinerova, Z
    Koza, I
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (16) : 293S - 293S
  • [9] A Community-Based Multicenter Trial of Pharmacokinetically Guided 5-Fluorouracil Dosing for Personalized Colorectal Cancer Therapy
    Patel, Jai N.
    O'Neil, Bert H.
    Deal, Allison M.
    Ibrahim, Joseph G.
    Sherrill, Gary B.
    Olajide, Oludamilola A.
    Atluri, Prashanti M.
    Inzerillo, John J.
    Chay, Christopher H.
    McLeod, Howard L.
    Walko, Christine M.
    ONCOLOGIST, 2014, 19 (09): : 959 - 965
  • [10] Cost-effectiveness of second-line treatment with irinotecan or infusional 5-fluorouracil in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Levy-Piedbois, C
    Durand-Zaleski, I
    Juhel, H
    Schmitt, C
    Bellanger, A
    Piedbois, P
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2000, 11 (02) : 157 - 161