Outcomes of Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix Are Not Affected by Wound Contamination

被引:48
|
作者
Garvey, Patrick B. [1 ]
Martinez, Roberto A. [1 ]
Baumann, Donald P. [1 ]
Liu, Jun [1 ]
Butler, Charles E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Plast Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
VENTRAL HERNIA REPAIR; INVASIVE COMPONENT SEPARATION; POLYPROPYLENE MESH; SYNTHETIC MESH; HIGH-RISK; INFECTION; COMPLEX; COMPLICATIONS; PROPHYLAXIS; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.06.021
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The optimal type of mesh for complex abdominal wall reconstruction has not been elucidated. We hypothesized that AWRs using acellular dermal matrix (ADM) experience low rates of surgical site occurrence (SSO) and surgical site infection, despite increasing degrees of wound contamination. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data from consecutive abdominal wall reconstructions with ADM over a 9-year period. Outcomes of abdominal wall reconstructions were compared between patients with different CDC wound classifications. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses identified potential associations and predictive/protective factors. RESULTS: The 359 patients had a mean follow-up of 28.3 +/- 19.0 months. Reconstruction of clean wounds (n = 171) required fewer reoperations than that of combined contaminated (n = 188) wounds (2.3% vs 11.2%; p = 0.001) and trended toward experiencing fewer SSOs (19.9% vs 28.7%, p = 0.052). There were no significant differences between clean and combined contaminated cases in 30-day SSI (8.8% vs 8.0%), hernia recurrence (9.9% vs 10.1%), and mesh removal (1.2% vs 1.1%) rates. Independent predictors of SSO included body mass index >= 30 kg/m(2) (odds ratio [OR] 3.6; p < 0.001), 1 or more comorbidities (OR 2.5; p = 0.008), and defect width >= 15 cm (OR 1.8; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Complex abdominal wall reconstructions using ADM demonstrated similar rates of complications between the different CDC wound classifications. This is in contradistinction to published outcomes for abdominal wall reconstruction using synthetic mesh that show progressively higher complication rates with increasing degrees of contamination. These data support the use of ADM rather than synthetic mesh for complex abdominal wall reconstruction in the setting of wound contamination. (C) 2014 by the American College of Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:853 / 864
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Acellular Dermal Matrix in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction
    Silverman, Ronald P.
    [J]. AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2011, 31 (07) : 24S - 29S
  • [2] Wound Contamination Does Not Affect Outcomes with Acellular Dermal Matrix in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: Evidence from Propensity Score Analysis
    Giordano, Salvatore
    Largo, Rene
    Garvey, Patrick B.
    Baumann, Donald P.
    Liu, Jun
    Butler, Charles E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2016, 223 (04) : E31 - E32
  • [3] Effect of Wound Contamination on Outcomes of Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Using Acellular Dermal Matrix: 14-Year Experience with More than 700 Patients
    Hassan, Abbas M.
    Asaad, Malke
    Seitz, Allison J.
    Liu, Jun
    Butler, Charles E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2021, 233 (06) : 676 - 684
  • [4] ABDOMINAL WALL RECONSTRUCTION WITH THE AID OF BOVINE ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX
    Rempelos, George
    Stampolidis, Nektarios
    Kourakos, Panagiotis
    Pallantzas, Athanasios
    Moutafidis, Michael
    Stasinopoulos, Ioannis
    Painesi, Sotiria
    Priggouris, Panagiotis
    Castana, Ourania
    [J]. WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2012, 20 (05) : A108 - A108
  • [5] Long-Term Outcomes after Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix
    Garvey, Patrick B.
    Giordano, Salvatore A.
    Baumann, Donald P.
    Liu, Jun
    Butler, Charles E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2017, 224 (03) : 341 - 350
  • [6] Outcomes after abdominal wall reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix: A systematic review
    Zhong, Toni
    Janis, Jeffrey E.
    Ahmad, Jamil
    Hofer, Stefan O. P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2011, 64 (12): : 1562 - 1571
  • [7] The Impact of Conflict of Interest in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction With Acellular Dermal Matrix
    DeGeorge, Brent R., Jr.
    Holland, Michael C.
    Drake, David B.
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2015, 74 (02) : 242 - 247
  • [8] Use of homologous acellular dermal matrix for abdominal wall reconstruction in rats
    Kaya, M
    Baba, F
    Bolukbas, F
    Boleken, ME
    Kanmaz, T
    Yucesan, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY, 2006, 19 (01) : 11 - 17
  • [9] Bovine versus Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix for Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction
    Clemens, Mark W.
    Selber, Jesse C.
    Liu, Jun
    Adelman, David M.
    Baumann, Donald P.
    Garvey, Patrick B.
    Butler, Charles E.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 131 (01) : 71 - 79
  • [10] Application of an Acellular Dermal Matrix Patch in Infant and Neonatal Abdominal Wall Reconstruction
    Wang, L-Y
    Dong, Y-Q
    Zhang, P-J
    Gong, Y-X
    Liu, F.
    Niu, H-Z
    Liu, C-Y
    [J]. WEST INDIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 66 (01): : 119 - 123