Muscle-specific movement-phase-dependent modulation of corticospinal excitability during upper-limb motor execution and motor imagery combined with virtual action observation

被引:10
|
作者
Suzuki, Yoshiyuki [1 ]
Kaneko, Naotsugu [2 ,3 ]
Sasaki, Atsushi [2 ,3 ]
Tanaka, Fumiya [1 ]
Nakazawa, Kimitaka [2 ]
Nomura, Taishin [1 ]
Milosevic, Matija [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Engn Sci, Dept Mech Sci & Bioengn, 1-3 Machikaneyama Cho, Toyonaka, Osaka 5608531, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Arts & Sci, Dept Life Sci, Meguro Ku, 3-8-1 Komaba, Tokyo 1538902, Japan
[3] Japan Soc Promot Sci, Chiyoda Ku, 5-3-1 Kojimachi, Tokyo 1020083, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Motor imagery; Kinesthetic; Hand; Corticospinal excitability; Computer graphics; STIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.neulet.2021.135907
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Corticospinal excitability in humans can be facilitated during imagination and/or observation of upper-limb motor tasks. However, it remains unclear to what extent facilitation levels may differ from those elicited during execution of the same tasks. Twelve able-bodied individuals were recruited in this study. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in extensor carpi radialis (ECR) and flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscles were elicited through transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex during: (i) rest; (ii) wrist extension; and (iii) wrist flexion. Responses were compared between: (1) motor imagery combined with virtual action observation (MI + AO; first-person virtual wrist movements shown on a computer display, while participants remained at rest and imagined these movements); and (2) motor execution (ME; participants extended or flexed their wrist). During MI + AO, ECR MEPs were facilitated during the extension phase but not the flexion phase, while FCR MEPs were facilitated during the flexion phase but not extension phase, compared to rest. During the ME condition, same, but greater, modulations were shown as those during MI + AO, while background muscle activities were similar in the rest phase as during extension and flexion phase in the MI + AO condition. Our results demonstrated that kinesthetic MI that included imagination and observation of virtual hands can elicit phasedependent muscles-specific corticospinal facilitation of wrist muscles, consistent to those during actual hand extension and flexion. Moreover, we showed that MI + AO can contribute considerably to the overall corticospinal facilitation (similar to 20 % of ME) even without muscle contractions. These findings support utility of computer graphics-based motor imagery, which may have implications for rehabilitation and development of braincomputer interfaces.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Vividness of Motor Imagery Is Correlated With Corticospinal Excitability During Combined Motor Imagery and Action Observation
    Moriuchi, Takefumi
    Nakashima, Akira
    Nakamura, Jiro
    Anan, Kimika
    Nishi, Keita
    Matsuo, Takashi
    Hasegawa, Takashi
    Mitsunaga, Wataru
    Iso, Naoki
    Higashi, Toshio
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 14
  • [2] Difference in phase modulation of corticospinal excitability during the observation of the action of walking, with and without motor imagery
    Kaneko, Naotsugu
    Masugi, Yohei
    Yokoyama, Hikaru
    Nakazawa, Kimitaka
    NEUROREPORT, 2018, 29 (03) : 169 - 173
  • [3] Modulation of lower limb muscle corticospinal excitability during various types of motor imagery
    Ishikawa, Keiichi
    Kaneko, Naotsugu
    Sasaki, Atsushi
    Nakazawa, Kimitaka
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2024, 818
  • [4] Sonification of combined action observation and motor imagery: Effects on corticospinal excitability
    Castro, Fabio
    Bryjka, Paulina Anna
    Di Pino, Giovanni
    Vuckovic, Aleksandra
    Nowicky, Alexander
    Bishop, Daniel
    BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2021, 152
  • [5] Motor imagery drives the effects of combined action observation and motor imagery on corticospinal excitability for coordinative lower-limb actions
    Grilc, Neza
    Valappil, Ashika Chembila
    Tillin, Neale A.
    Mian, Omar S.
    Wright, David J.
    Holmes, Paul S.
    Castelli, Federico
    Bruton, Adam M.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [6] Motor imagery alone drives corticospinal excitability during concurrent action observation and motor imagery
    Meers, Rosie
    Nuttall, Helen E.
    Vogt, Stefan
    CORTEX, 2020, 126 : 322 - 333
  • [7] Execution-dependent modulation of corticospinal excitability during action observation
    Masanori Sakamoto
    Tetsuro Muraoka
    Nobuaki Mizuguchi
    Kazuyuki Kanosue
    Experimental Brain Research, 2009, 199 : 17 - 25
  • [8] Comparison of EEG Changes during Action Observation, Action Observation combined with Motor imagery and Motor Execution of lower limb
    Wang, Liyu
    Li, Penghai
    Liu, Yingtao
    Bai, Xinyu
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SYSTEMS, ELECTRONICS AND CONTROL (ICCSEC), 2017, : 1075 - 1080
  • [9] Execution-dependent modulation of corticospinal excitability during action observation
    Sakamoto, Masanori
    Muraoka, Tetsuro
    Mizuguchi, Nobuaki
    Kanosue, Kazuyuki
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2009, 199 (01) : 17 - 25
  • [10] EXECUTION-DEPENDENT MODULATION OF THE CORTICOSPINAL EXCITABILITY DURING ACTION OBSERVATION
    Sakamoto, Masanori
    Muraoka, Tetsuro
    Mizuguchi, Nobuaki
    Kanosue, Kazuyuki
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 59 : 281 - 281