A prospective randomized study of gemcitabine with doxifluridine versus paclitaxel with doxifluridine in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

被引:44
|
作者
Chung, HW
Bang, SM
Park, SW
Chung, JB
Kang, JK
Kim, JW
Seong, JS
Lee, WJ
Song, SY
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Therapeut Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Brain Korea Project Med Sci 21, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
pancreatic carcinoma; chemoradiotherapy; gemcitabine; paclitaxel; doxifluridine;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.05.061
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with paclitaxel-based CCRT in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods and Materials: A total of 48 patients who had received no prior therapy were enrolled. The patients were treated with 4500 cGy radiation in 25 fractions over 5 weeks concomitant with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2)/week/intravenously (IV) and doxifluridine 600 mg/m(2)/day/by mouth (PO), or paclitaxel 50 mg/m(2)/week/IV and doxifluridine 600 mg/m(2)/day/PO. After a 4-week rest, the responses were evaluated and maintenance therapies (operation or chemotherapy) (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2)/week/IV and doxifluridine 600 mg/m(2)/day/PO) were conducted. Results: The median survival was 12 months in the gemcitabine group vs. 14 months in the paclitaxel group. The response rate was 13.6% vs. 25%, and the median time to progression was 12 months vs. 12.5 months, respectively. The positive rate of the clinical benefit response was 59.1% vs. 41.7%, respectively. Toxicities were acceptable in both groups. Conclusion: In this trial, we demonstrated that the gemcitabine-based CCRT and the paclitaxel-based CCRT in combination of doxifluridine are clearly acceptable treatment strategy, and appear more effective than the 5 fluorouracil-based CCRT for locally advanced pancreatic cancer with comparable tolerability. Furthermore, the paclitaxel-based CCRT showed similar efficacy and toxicities to the gemcitabine-based treatment when it was combined with 5-fluorouracil. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1494 / 1501
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with doxifluridine and paclitaxel for extrahepatic bile duct cancer
    Park, Jeong Youp
    Park, Seung Woo
    Chung, Jae Bock
    Seong, Jinsil
    Kim, Kyung Sik
    Lee, Woo Jung
    Song, Si Young
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2006, 29 (03): : 240 - 245
  • [2] Phase I trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy using doxifluridine and paclitaxel in advanced breast cancer
    Hirowatari, H.
    Karasawa, K.
    Ito, K.
    Takada, F.
    Izawa, H.
    Furuya, T.
    Kurokawa, C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (03): : S238 - S238
  • [3] Intravenous 5-fluorouracil versus oral doxifluridine as preoperative concurrent chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer: Prospective randomized trials
    Kim, NK
    Min, JS
    Park, JK
    Yun, SH
    Sung, JS
    Jung, HC
    Roh, JK
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 31 (01) : 25 - 29
  • [4] Concurrent chemoradiotherapy treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Gemcitabine versus 5-fluorouracil, a randomized controlled study
    Li, CP
    Chao, Y
    Chi, KH
    Chan, WK
    Teng, HC
    Lee, RC
    Chang, FY
    Lee, SD
    Yen, SH
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 57 (01): : 98 - 104
  • [5] GEMCITABINE FOLLOWED BY CONCURRENT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED PANCREATIC CANCER
    Yasui, H.
    Okazaki, S.
    Tanaka, M.
    Araki, N.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2013, 24
  • [6] Concurrent chemoradiotherapy treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Gemcitabine versus 5-fluorouracil, a randomized controlled study. Response
    Crane, CH
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 58 (03): : 1009 - 1009
  • [7] Concurrent Full Dose Gemcitabine versus Concurrent 5-Fluorouracil Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    Rakhra, S. S.
    Chung, A.
    Helenowski, I.
    Mulcahy, M.
    Hayes, J.
    Small, W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S337 - S337
  • [8] PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING FLUOROURACIL VERSUS DOXIFLURIDINE FOR THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED COLORECTAL-CANCER
    BAJETTA, E
    COLLEONI, M
    ROSSO, R
    SOBRERO, A
    AMADORI, D
    COMELLA, G
    MARANGOLO, M
    SCANNI, A
    LORUSSO, V
    CALABRESI, F
    BONSIGNORI, M
    CRIVELLARI, D
    PASQUINI, E
    BRUZZI, P
    REPETTO, M
    CRISCUOLO, D
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1993, 29A (12) : 1658 - 1663
  • [9] Gemcitabine-based Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    Wang, Bu-Hai
    Cao, Wen-Miao
    Yu, Jie
    Wang, Xiao-Lei
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2012, 13 (05) : 2129 - 2132
  • [10] "HEATPAC" - a phase II randomized study of concurrent thermochemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Datta, Niloy Ranjan
    Pestalozzi, Bernhard
    Clavien, Pierre-Alain
    Siebenhuner, Alexander
    Puric, Emsad
    Khan, Shaka
    Mamot, Christoph
    Riesterer, Oliver
    Knuchel, Jurg
    Reiner, Cacilia Sophie
    Bodis, Stephan
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2017, 12